PDA

View Full Version : Watergate versus Neocon-gate



Wolfram
07-06-2005, 10:18 PM
I always liked Richard Nixon, and have been thinking about him and the Watergate affair quite a bit lately.

Back in 1973/1974, the jewsmedia had turned into a pack of ravenous hyenas, out to destroy Nixon--and for what? All that Watergate was about was a break-in at the Democratic Party's National Committee offices in the Watergate Apartments, and the removal of some documents. That was all; nobody was killed or injured, yet this was blown out of all proportion into a cause célèbre until Nixon was forced to resign in August 1974. A much-ado-about nothing.

Contrast this with el Presidente Jorge Dubya Arbusto, the Mestizo-loving moron,and his neo-schmucks, who've launched a war under false pretenses. The acknowledged American death toll is approaching 1,800, with around 13,000 wounded--some maimed for life--and upwards of 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians killed, the country's infrastructure in ruins, and our
national image besmirched for years to come. I detest Michael Moore, but I'm beginning to agree with him when he called our fellow citizens, collectively, the dumbest people on the planet--"Here I stand, I can do no other. God help me, I cannot help myself. Amen."

Of course, the liberals and communists hated Nixon since he secured the conviction of their darling Alger Hiss in 1950. Also, he made some unflattering remarks about you-know-who, which hasn't been forgiven to this day.


Wolfram

Am Nat
07-07-2005, 01:15 AM
I was never a fan of Nixon, to me he was the prototype ofthe slimeballs to come like Clinton and W., but the Downing Street Memo is a thousand timesmore damningthan Watergate.


Watergate ended up in Nixon's undoing because media liberals genuinely loathed him and wanted to do him in. There are plenty in the establishment media who don't like Bush, but they know better than to rock the boat. It's the difference between when the U.S. still had vestiges of separation of powers and freedom of the press (30 years ago) and what we have now,dictatorial controlin everything but name.


But that's not to say there can't be a contrived media turning on Bush if he becomes unpopular enough. It's all about the ruling class doing what is necessary to maintain control of their system.