View Full Version : Many Whites won’t vote for a black!
Michael
06-05-2008, 10:15 PM
An article entitled "Obama vs. McCain"
Hillary seems to be stepping aside this weekend and admitting that the Democratic nomination for President belongs to Obama. I continue to hear even liberal and whiggerish Whites stating openly that they will not vote for Obama, no matter what. Some of them make veiled admitions that their position on him is due to race, while others try to throw out far-fetched excuses about him being the AntiChrist according to the Book of Revelations, et cetera.
What will be interesting to see is whether McCain, despite his cheerleading for the unpopular war and his left-wing support for open immigration, will win the general election simply because of a White voter backlash. Wouldn’t THAT be ironic?
http://www.whiterevolution.com/story.php?id=220 (http://www.whiterevolution.com/story.php?id=220)
Michael
06-23-2008, 10:22 PM
An article entitled "Obama to Nation: "Vote for me or you’re a "RACIST!""
Election 2008 to shatter American race relations.
http://cofcc.org/?p=1593
Adolar
06-24-2008, 05:17 PM
If the Republicans had nominated someone like Mitt Romney (not that I have any high regard for him), he would probably have walked away with the election versus Barack Yomama.
It certainly seems that the media (and the powers-that-be, generally) have resurrected John McCainiac from the political graveyard which he was in last fall and winter for their own sinister purposes.
Don Wassall
06-25-2008, 12:19 AM
All the "major" Dem and Repub candidates are servants of Israel, but McCain is the most reliably slavish of all.
And seemingly the most mentally unstable as well. I used to not put much stock in the Armageddon industry, but the combination of crazed Judaized Christians and crazed Zionists is pushing the world to the brink of catastrophe.
Adolar
06-25-2008, 01:08 AM
All the "major" Dem and Repub candidates are servants of Israel, but McCain is the most reliably slavish of all.
And seemingly the most mentally unstable as well. I used to not put much stock in the Armageddon industry, but the combination of crazed Judaized Christians and crazed Zionists is pushing the world to the brink of catastrophe.
The same thought occurred to me on a number of occasions. Armageddon, the ancient Megiddo, is in the same Middle Eastquagmire where we are currently bogged down, with possibly worse to come (Iran?).
bjhoostal
06-28-2008, 10:13 PM
Agreed,
The first place they ALL ran to was AIPAC.
- Brian
Michael
09-16-2008, 09:47 PM
An article entitled "Ohio State Rep: "Race is the only reason why Ohioans wouldn’t vote Obama.""
A white left-wing state rep has joined with the throngs of radical black newspapers and radio talk shows is pronouncing that race is the "only" reason anyone would not vote for Obama.
State Rep. Thomas Letson, is a white democrat who beat his Republican incumbent by getting virtually all of the black vote. He represents Warren, Ohio, which is 25% black. By making extremist comments like the one shown below, he is setting the stage for the biggest meltdown in American race relations in history.
So if Obama doesn’t get 60%-65% of the vote in Ohio, it is solely because of "racists!"
http://cofcc.org/?p=2569
Colonel_Reb
09-17-2008, 11:14 PM
No doubt this is where we are quickly heading in this country. In no way will we be allowed to prefer any race over another, unless we become educated, organize, and do something about it quickly.!
realgeorge
11-16-2008, 11:56 PM
"McCain is a sure thing ..." paraphrased from an article posted last month at ANU from the Newswithviews.com website. A someone named Goeff Metcalf wrote "Arrogance of Presumed Power" and described the behavior of Barak Obama as having won the election many weeks before the voting. Well, Obama certainly did act like that. I agree that American candidates have done the same thing in the past. Bill Clinton was like that in 1992.
But I gag a little bit with "contrarian" views of the GOP winning elections when they are dead meat. Mr. Metcalf gave a slew of reasons why Obama would lose to McCain. First let me agree with Dr. Wassall that presidential elections should largely be ignored by real nationalists as they are as rigged as any in the world. More importantly, I've seen this before, a prediction of a Republican victory in the face of an obvious rout.
It reminds me of our good friends at Human Events, the "conservative" magazine published in DC, nearly always a propaganda rag for the Republican Party. Some years ago in my misspent youth I visited the offices of Human Events. I was accompanying Fred, theeditor of "Conservative Review" published in Northern Virginia until about 1997. Fred introduced me to the various folks of Human Events ... it was a pleasant meeting. One character I met was a portly, chain-smoking gent named John who was their "election beat" reporter. The mid-term elections of 1998 were coming up .... that horrible beast Bill Clinton had been in charge for some years, and undoubtedly the GOP was about to kick arse and clean house and make huge Congressional wins that year. It was thus printed with much fanfarein Human Events.
So much for GOP prognostication. The Democrats won major victories that year, not and the Human Events prediction looked more than foolish. The NewsWithViews rosy prediction of White people coming to their senses and electing McCain was equally dubious.
Although the New World Order folks can be fickle about how EXACTLY they will screw up American and destroy its institutions, I couldn't see them passing up the chance to put a Communist Negro on the throne. Not a Kosher Konservative like Alan Keyes, but a hideous leftist radical. He might make a move or two that the CFR doesn't like, but highly unlikely will do anything to upset the New World Order applecart. In fact I'm sure that the Rockefeller-Rothschild-Murdoch axis is filled with glee that the Negroid Messiah will pull apart America's social sweater with violent jerks.
So ... NewsWithViews now occupies my "lost credibility" file for 2008. But they still have Alan Stang and Chuck Baldwin as writers, so that's OKEdited by: realgeorge
Don Wassall
11-17-2008, 05:36 AM
Nice post, realgeorge. One of the ironies of the recent presidential election is that NewsWithViews, Human Events and the rest of the conservative and paleo-conservative crowd would rather be waterboarded than given an explicitly racial appeal to whites. That's just one of the reasons why the "conservative movement" is a joke, and so is the Republican Party.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.