View Full Version : Did We Land On The Moon?
02-28-2009, 09:09 PM
Just curious everyone's opinion.
02-28-2009, 10:09 PM
Hmmmmm -- do you mean did we land on the moon or send men there, Max? I seriously doubt we ever did the latter.
Did we really land on the Moon?
URL Source: http://youtube.com/watch?v=Cu6KN89seAs
Published: Jul 30, 2008
Author: Bart Sibrel
This short video is just a taster. If you download the UTorrent program and go to torrentz.com I recommend downloading Astronauts Gone Wild. I was sceptical at first, but after watching all that Bart Sibrel has put out, I'm 100% convinced that we never landed on the Moon.
03-03-2009, 02:25 AM
Did we really land on the Moon?
URL Source: </font>http://youtube.com/watch?v=Cu6KN89seAs</font> (http://youtube.com/watch?v=Cu6KN89seAs)
Published: Jul 30, 2008
Author: Bart Sibrel
This short video is just a taster. If you download the UTorrent program and go to torrentz.com I recommend downloading Astronauts Gone Wild. I was sceptical at first, but after watching all that Bart Sibrel has put out, I'm 100% convinced that we never landed on the Moon. </font>
I hadn't seen that video, pretty odd that he wouldn't swear on the Bible. I have seen similar documentaries like the one you described that are very eye opening.
I'm not sure if this is Bart Sibrel as well but Buzz Aldrin apparently gets fed up with these questions.
Edited by: maximumrebel1
03-03-2009, 04:52 AM
I would vote "not sure" but we don't have that option. I'm open-minded on the subject and enjoy reading the arguments of those who say it was a hoax.
03-09-2009, 01:00 AM
NASA was an all-White, Male dominated, talented organization from its inception in 1950s until an imperceptible period between 1975 and 1985 when it became like all of our current institutions. Since that period it has become infested with feminists and non-Whites. The magnificent All-White Male institutions of America, the scientific and engineering ones, actually performed all the feats that we were able to discern through ordinary media. Landing on the Moon and prowling about on it was just another Great White party for Americans, akin to building and flying high-perf jets off of aircraft carriers and building telescope lenses of unimaginable engineering tolerance.
I believe that the photos from the Moon of Armstrong, Aldrin, etc. were authentic. VHF radio transmissions from Moon to Earth are no big deal.
But just as easily, America was utterly fooled by the metallurgical fallacy of the falling of the Twin Towers on 9-11 day. Structural steel doesn't melt from a visit from a few flames from jet fuel. What I preach to colleagues and co-workers -- and am amazed at their inability to comprehend -- is that one could take a major skyscraper like a Twin Tower, prepare a fire every twenty yards from ground to top, and light all of them. The building would not become structurally unsound. You could burn the entire building at once, burning all the combustible material available, and the building would stand quite nicely. In fact it could burn for days or even weeks, and not show the slightest instability.
The only question on 9-11 was whether the explosive demolitions company, that was hired to wire the buildings and demolish them, was Jew- or Gentile-owned
Find the NASA Channel on a Dish system somewhere, and enjoy watching some footage from scientists in the Space Station. It's real. So were the Saturn Five launches. And Apollo and Soyuz and Gemini and the Space Shuttle. So let's not fret that the golf balls on the Moon was a fake. It was not. No, let's lament that the current NASA is chock full of Commy-libs, faggys, loopy females, and career bureaucrats whose primary mission is Affirmative Action, not astrophysics or space travelEdited by: realgeorge
An object (like a lunar module) flying thru a vaccum will retain the built up of heat from the sun, from heat generated from electronics, from heat generated by humans onboard.
IMO, it's physically impossible to keep a lunar module cool in the vacuum of space.
Based on this argument alone makes space travel by humans impossible.
A vacuum cannot cool anything.
If there is technical info available to discredit what I just wrote, I'm willing to review it and learn from it.
Edited by: UncleDudley
03-09-2009, 01:41 PM
Yes! Big question: Did they really have the technology in 1969 -- forty years ago, just 22 years after Sputnik?
Next question -- did they have the honesty to tell the public the truth about anything back then? They don't now. The heroes in spacesuits were high-ranking freemasons (a possible reason they don't want to swear on the Bible). Texe Marrs demonstrates that NASA has been occult from the start -- people I know swear it's massively involved in turning stolen children into System drones.
If they did go to the moon, that's great -- but forgive me, I have trouble giving the Permanent Regime credit for doing anything good or right.
I need to add this comment.
Heat exchangers, such as a/c units, do not work in a vacuum. There is still a need to discard accumulated heat. A vacuum does not absorb heat.
This same primciple applies to the "space suits". How did the astronaut stay cool?
The thermodynamics of a vacuum are a troubling aspect of this mission. How did they do it? Some say it's impossible.
And also, why haven't they done it again recently?
Nelson3: If they did go to the moon, that's great -- but forgive me, I have trouble giving the Permanent Regime credit for doing anything good or right.
Have they ev er lied to us? There is nothing about the moon mission images that could not have been produced in Arizona.
03-09-2009, 06:24 PM
It certainly is odd that they simply stopped maned moon flights..... oh yes, below is what I wrote in my 9 from /\/</span> </span>mailer #45 last September. Thought I was gradually posting them here? Maybe not, can't find so just started thread for it -- 9 from /\/ series: Nelsonís email roundup.
2. The fedgov must be officially pagan. I thought they believed in the separation of religion from everything else, but what do you know, when the Apollo 11 astronauts returned from their supposed moon walk, here's how Nixon kvelled over it:
"It is the spirit of Apollo that American can now help to bring to our relations with other nations. The spirit of Apollo transcends geographical barriers and political diffferences. It can bring the people of the world together in peace."
<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=p4etqjogDK0C&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=%22the+s pirit+of+apollo+transcends%22&source=web&ots=yL5lX 0hIA-&sig=m5AJTBI54_dMeo9VDj7YCTkxHMY&hl=en#PPA95,M1" eudora="autourl" target="_blank" target="_blank"> http://books.google.com/books?id=p4etqjogDK0C&pg=PA95&am p;am p;lpg=PA95&dq=%22the+spirit+of+apollo+transcends%2 2& source=web&ots=yL5lX0hIA-&sig=m5AJTBI54_dMeo9VDj7YCT kxHMY&hl=en#PPA95,M1
</a>Wait a minute -- I tried googling "never went to the moon" and THIS turned up,
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn6WZf_eOvE" eudora="autourl" target="_blank" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn6WZf_eOvE
</a>........chillingly highlighting REVELATION 9:11: "And they had as king over them the king of the abyss, whose name in Hebrew was Abaddon, and in Greek Apollyon."
Footnote: Abaddon and Apollyon mean Destroyer."
<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=73&chapter=9&verse=11&version=31&context= verse" eudora="autourl" target="_blank" target="_blank"> http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=73&chapter= 9&verse=11&version=31&context=verse
</a>It's easy to believe the moon walk was a hoax. The craters in a VHS documentary I just watched look as fake as can be -- same in the above film. (Are they really Schrafft's chocolate/vanilla cookies?) It has been asked why this sublime achievement of all history, this "giant leap for mankind", was only repeated into 1972 -- in other words, DISCONTINUED 36 years ago. Maybe they figured a 100-year cowboys 'n' indians fantasy trip in Iranq (sic) would sell more tickets.
<x-tab></x-tab>It's a shame the above video is done by baby-boomers who have to do everything in the mode of a 1960s acid trip -- tons of images and issues speeding past. What I'd like to know is how such a tiny vessel traveled back from the moon, a quarter-million miles away, in ten hours. What gave it sufficient thrust, even with the moon's reduced gravity? Did that parachute really waft them safely through the atmosphere -- how did the guys manage to look so fresh after a 500,000-mile trip ending with a crash into the ocean?
This is getting fun:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu6KN89seAs&feature=related" eudora="autourl" target="_blank" target="_blank"> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu6KN89seAs&feature=relat ed
</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Sibrel" eudora="autourl" target="_blank" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Sibrel
</a><x-tab></x-tab>Bottom line: if they really had us gawking at a starless space background during the live TV coverage of the moonwalk, we must be dumber than the Ooogabooga tribe eating bugs and yak dung on the banks of the great, green, greasy Limpopo River.
WHOA, here's the scene from the (UGH!) James Bond movie Diamonds are Forever comprising, in one obviously grave pundit's words,
"without doubt, whistleblowing on a very grand scale".
Edited by: Nelson3
I think they quit because they refused to fire some flares from the "moonbase" so all on earth could see they were there.
That would have been so easy to do, and proof positive.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.