Let’s get physical with race differences

[Nelson3]

"We're sisters neath the skin," the ducks told the hens in G.L. Rockwell's fable The Ducks and the Hens. And in human terms, they've screamed at us for 60 years that there are no differences between the races beyond skin color, fecklessly attempting to stonewall the glaringly obvious differences in hair type and facial structure, never mind the deeper ones non-technical people don't suspect re bone density, brain structure etc.

Part of our job is chronicling how numerous and profound the physical differences are -- especially when they happen to show how much healthier a race the supposedly inferior, degenerate whites are than some others. Up first, a mouthy JAP:

http://www.curetoday.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/article.show/i d/2/article_id/1329
<h1 style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Race, Genetics &amp; Cancer</h1>BY KAREN PATTERSON



<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">

Does ancestry play a rolein cancer risk and outcome? </span>
</div>..........Weiner, now 37, says it’s troubling to grasp that a part of her
identity—her Ashkenazi heritage—is linked to a higher risk of cancer.“We
kind of have been gypped,” she says. “There are so many health problems
with Jewish people ... that they have to look for in genetics. And now
here’s another thing.“But at least they now know there is something out there to look for; there is that BRCA test,” Weiner says.Knowledge
about links between ancestry and cancer risk is growing—and with it,
the possibilities of tailoring screening and prevention efforts to
specific populations, and targeting treatments to particular genetic
characteristics of a tumor or a patient........



Edited by: Nelson3

[Michael]

An article entitled "Science Daily: Whites have lowest instance of MAOA-L Gene, which is linked to aggression, violence, crime, and sexual abuse."


American black males in the are twice as likely than American white males to have MAOA-L which has been linked to crime, violence and aggression in scores of studies going back over fifteen years. Black males are also 13.5 times more likely to have a rare version of the gene associated with “extreme violence and extreme aggression.” Latinos and American Indians are also nearly twice as likely as whites to have the more common version of the gene. However they are only about one fourth as likely to have the extreme version compared to blacks.

http://cofcc.org/2010/05/science-daily-whites-have-lowest-in (http://cofcc.org/2010/05/science-daily-whites-have-lowest-instance-of-maoa-l-gene-which-is-linked-to-aggressi&#111;n-violence-crime-and-sexual-abuse/) stance-of-maoa-l-gene-which-is-linked-to-aggression-violence -crime-and-sexual-abuse/

[Nelson3]

AmRen

<a href="http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/12/african-america_8.php" target="_blank" target="_blank">
African-Americans Have Different Plaque,</a> UPI; <a href="http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/12/african-america_8.php#comments" target="_blank" target="_blank">
0comments</a>


They have a kind that increases risk of heart attack.</font>


LATER. AMREN

<a href="http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/02/study_native_ha.php" target="_blank">
Study: Native Hawaiians at Higher Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke at Younger Age,</a> Physorg.com; <a href="http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/02/study_native_ha.php#comments" target="_blank">
4comments</a>


They suffer strokes 10 years earlier than others.</font>

Edited by: Nelson3

[Michael]

An article entitled "“The Mismeasure of Science”"


Stephen Jay Gould’s vastly influential 1981 book on IQ, The Mismeasure of Man, is an odd beast since it is heavily devoted to debunking dead and often forgotten old scientists. For example, a sizable chunk denounces Samuel George Morton, who died in 1851. Gould claimed to have reanalyzed Morton’s data on skull sizes and shown that Morton distorted his results to fit his biases.
A new study of Morton’s old skulls by Jason E. Lewis, Ralph L. Holloway, et al, shows that Gould was projecting.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2011/06/10/the-mismeasure-of- (http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2011/06/10/the-mismeasure-of-science/) science/

[Michael]

An article entitled "Racial Differences in Narcissistic Tendencies"

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/10/racial_differen_3.php

[Michael]

An article entitled " Low Test Scores? Blame Race"

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/12/low_test_scores.php

[Michael]

An article entitled "Why the British are free-thinking and the Chinese love conformity: It's all in the genes claim scientists"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2113350/Why-individualism-free-thinking-genes-British-people.html

[Michael]

An article entitled "A Proposed Biblical Model for Racial Origins"

http://faithandheritage.com/2012/07/a-proposed-biblical-model-for-racial-origins/

[Michael]

An article entitled "New Revelations on the Diversity of Mankind"


The latest, ground-breaking, anthropology research is causing quite a storm. The most popular theory is that modern man, Homo Sapiens Sapiens (modern man) evolved in Africa and then spread throughout the world. On the finding that Europeans had a small presence of genes also shared by Neanderthals, it was thought that Europeans mixed somewhat with Neanderthals as Europeans had these genes but Africans did not.

Now it turns out that the evidence is very powerful that Europeans did not breed with Neanderthals, and the genes were simply genetic artifacts from ancestors of both Neanderthals and European (and Asians). That means about 500,000 years ago when Neanderthals Africans were already divided between those which would go on to evolve into the modern races of Europeans and Asians, and those who would go on to evolve into modern Africans.

Once again the deep diversity created by geographic separation and eons have shown to be at work in humans just as the biodiversity in the what we call the animal kingdom. This wonderful diversity of mankind is not a social construct but an evolutionary fact that explains the great diversity of culture and ethnic personality all over the world. Just as we strive to preserve biodiversity in plants and animals, we must strive to preserve this rich diversity in humanity. Furthermore if we don’t recognize these deep differences of evolution between the expressions of humanity we will be doomed to perpetual war and conflict. People are as they are because over thousands of years they evolved with a common gene pool that gave them a societal and cultural harmony. When nations experience massive immigration of starkly different people into the same living space, history shows that it leads almost inevitably to conflict and strife, war and civil war. Science everyday validates the human diversity that exists and that all peoples have the right to preserve and celebrate.

http://www.davidduke.com/?p=35733

[Michael]

An article entitled "AIDS-Like Disease In Asians: Not Contagious, But Damages Immune System"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/22/aids-like-disease-asians-immune-system_n_1823296.html

[Michael]

An article entitled "'Survivor' France Contestant Gerald Babin Dies, Season Canceled"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/25/survivor-france-gerald-babin-dies_n_2949934.html

A black male dies of heart attack doing hard labor.

[Nelson4]

AmRen headlines and Mr. Taylor's comments:

California Ordered to Move Prisoners at Risk of Valley Fever, Los Angeles Times
Blacks are most likely to catch the disease.

Ethnic Differences in Responses to Multiple Experimental Pain Stimuli, University of Hawai'i
Study finds blacks have a lower pain threshold than whites.

[Nelson4]

Quickly on the heels of the above:

http://www.amren.com/news/2013/05/stanford-study-says-mri-scans-can-predict-outcome-of-math-tutoring/
Stanford Study Says MRI Scans Can Predict Outcome of Math Tutoring

Any fool should be able to realize with no effort that if physical differences are as great as between black and white, the defaul assumption would be that mental/intellectual/emotional differences are to be expected too. But in today's clinically mad world we're told that all humans are logically the same beneath the skin -- even when proven otherwise.

[Nelson4]

http://collapsereport.com/2013/05/17/blacks-related-closer-to-chimps-than-humans-really/

Blacks Related Closer to Chimps Than Humans? Really?
May 17, 2013 · by FromTheEditorsDesk · in Uncategorized

Another study looking at African DNA has found that they are closer to Chimpanzees than Humans.

The more important of the two is Deka et al., Am. J. Human Genetics 56, pgs. 461-474, 1995. This study looks at some genetic markers and compares the genetic distances of eight human populations (Samoans, North Amerindians, South Amerindians, New Guineans, Kachari [Mongolids], Germans, more generalized Caucasians, and Sokoto Negroes from Nigeria [Nigerian sub-Saharan African Negroes]) to each other and to chimpanzees. The data were analyzed two ways – with Nei’s standard genetic distance, and with modified Cavalli-Sforza distance.

Which group was genetically closest to chimpanzees? The answer for both methods was the Nigerian Negro group. Using Nei’s method, the Nigerian-chimp distance was 1.334 +/- 0.375, by far the closest value (second closest was the Kachari value of 1.527 +/- 0.493). To be fair, and show we are not knee-jerk “Eurocentrics” hiding data, the group farthest from the chimps was the South Amerindians (1.901 +/- 0.529); however the Germans (1.865 +/- 0.506) and the more general Caucasians (1.860 +/- 0.497) were right behind them (and given the +/- values, virtually overlapping). Looking at the Cavalli-Sforza method, the Sokoto Nigerians were again the closest to chimps (0.539) by a large margin. The farthest were again the South Amerindians (0.712), with the Germans (0.680) and general Caucasians (0.667) being a very close third and fourth behind the South Amerindians as well as Samoans (0.711) and North Amerindians (0.697). So, while the two methods give slightly different orders, in both cases the Nigerians are by far the closest group to the chimps. Once again, given the first method, these sub-Saharan Africans were at 1.334 while all the other groups ranged from 1.527-1.901, and given the second method they were at 0.539 while the other groups ranged from 0.643 (Kachari again) to 0.712. Thus, based on these data, the sub-Saharan African group is genetically closest to chimps. The authors state the following about “neighbor-joining trees” based on these data, using the chimps as the “outgroup”:

“…the SO [Sokoto Nigerian - my note] population is the furthest from all the other human populations.”

Indeed, these genetic data are consistent with the work of J. Irish, reviewed here, demonstrating that sub-Saharan Africans are dentally more similar to extinct and extant apes, and to extinct hominids and australopithecines, than are any other human population. The genetic data and the dental phenotypic data match perfectly.................