Who is “Maud Dib”?

[Michael]

Someone referred to as "Maud Dib" appears to have been banned at Stormfront. Some people appear to be very happy about it.


http://www.panf.info/upload/showthread.php?t=669


http://www.panf.info/upload/showthread.php?t=655


While others appear to be upset by it.


http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=9983


I know nothing more about this other than what I have read at these web sites.


What do you know and think?


Who is "Maud Dib"?

[aryanfreeman]

I don'tknow who it is, but most likely the person was at odds with PANF's inclusiveness of the Asiatic hybrids as whites. The Overthrow people's motivesare anyone's guess.

Overthrow and American Free Press (home of The Monster) each share a common smear technique, reserved exclusively for rivals. Any right-oriented organization, Nationalist, pro-Confederate, Economic protectionist, or similar organization, that's getting pretty good traction and attracting lots of members, suddenly becomes "Pro-Zionist." Or more exactly, the "Zionist-approved" form of an otherwise beneficial movement. Orgs they have so slandered:
<UL>
<LI>The Institute for Historical Review ... AFP in its "Spotlight" days branded IHR as "The Zionist Wing" of Historical Revisionism
<LI>American Renaissance ... Mr. Taylor its prez was also AFP'd, referring to him as "The Zionist voice" of the White Racialist movement
<LI>The British National Party (BNP) ... Just last week the Overthrow boys told us of BNP's status as "Zionist-approved"
<LI>Stormfront.Org ... which has a link to the American Nationalist Union ... has earned Overthrow's seal of approval as "Zionist Approved"
<LI>Bet you didn't know that VDare, Samuel Francis's legacy, is a genuine "Zionist Approved" organization according to Overthrow
<LI>And so is VNN, National Alliance, National Vanguard, Dixie Outfitters, David Duke, Erich Glebe .... and many more I'm sure if I cared to continue reading</LI>[/list]


By association we all rate as "Zionist Approved" from the distrbutor of "Libertarian Socialist News Service", one weird dudeEdited by: Realgeorge

[aryanfreeman]

Actually a lot of criticisms posted by Overthrow have some merit, even though I believe the main reason for the criticisms are intended to promote Overthrow &amp; it's subsidiaries as the best offer for the white community. Most of these allegedly pro-white / patriot orgs are just tapping into an otherwise untapped market &amp; Overthrow obviously thinks they can out preform what's out there.


In fairness to Overthrow , an org I'm not interested in joining or supporting, their observations were pretty correct. Most of the orgs mentioned are front groups, in my opinion. Even Jew friendly (AR,BNP,AFP). VNN &amp; Glenn Miller aremost assuredly untrustworthy, IMO. All Overthrow said about NA,NV,Euro,&amp; SF was they were dues panderers. As for the others they are pretty much kosher-conservatives. That's pretty accurate. Ironically, within the framework ofOverthrow's newest org, they require more dues, than those criticised.


Getting back to Maud Dib, his position was that making alliances with orgs that allow Jews as members is detrimental to the White Nationalist Cause. ThatTruth was censored on SF. Edited by: aryanfreeman

Thanks for the analysis Aryyanfreeman


The world of NWO Opposition-space is a strange soup indeed. How it will ever congeal into an effective force is beyond my comprehension

[Adolar]

This comes as a big surprise to me, since Muad Dib was an old-timer from Louisiana and seemed a fixture at Stormfront. I myself enjoyed many a friendly exchange with him on SF for a number of years.


I also collaborated with "Robert J. Schrijnen" (real name Jan van Biervliet, who lives in Kortrijk, Belgium)in runningthe EuroKnowledge group. He also has disappeared from SF.

[Michael]

Our movement looks broken and small and divided but there are many pieces to it but many of these organizations are loosely connected together. In an article entitled "Former Alabama Police Chief Breaks Taboo Against Exposing MLK Fraud" by Olaf Childress in the November/December 2006 The Nationalist Times it starts out:



"A growing number of tabloids inspired by and in addition to The Nationalist Times are working hand in hand with Don Wassall and his staff for a return to honest journalism."


You can read the rest in the print edition or online at the link to the side if you are a subscriber.


"A growing number" is the key words despite how dark everything looks now we are growing! There are many groups and we are growing. I would divide the movement into three parts one that is pro-Zionist and anti-Islamic but generally against blacks and Mestizos and varies on Asians. This branch could be referred to as the Taylor faction after Jared Taylor who appears to be the main leader of this faction in the USA. This faction is very new and likely will burn bright for a short time and disappear because it is pro-war and is basically mainstream like but it could for a short time attract attention to racial nationalism and after it demise many rank and file members will move on other racial nationalist groups without the baggiest. The next group that covers from the racial conservatives to national socialist (little "n" little "s"). This is the core group (could be referred to the mainstream of racial nationalism). Most likely the ANU is included here. Dr. Duke would like be the primary leader of this faction. The Duke faction let's call it would be the most likely to lead the nationalist forces to power. This group is very divided on issues but so they would need some level of economical and some social collapse that would bring this faction into oneness since that would tend to make the option fewer and the path clear. The third faction we will call the White faction after Bill White. This is the National Socialist with capital "N" capital "S". These element is the most divided and hardest to control but may serve the function of a distraction allowing the Duke faction the time it needs to rise.


In many ways, the Duke and White factions of the racial nationalist movement may be viewed as two political parties without a dime worth of difference between them as was it Wallace who said something like that. Most of the attacks are politically posturing to gain advantage but their overall goals are the same.


If we look at all these factions we will see far less division especially when the going gets rough than we would at first believe.

[Don Wassall]

"A growing number of tabloids inspired by and in addition to The Nationalist Times are working hand in hand with Don Wassall and his staff for a return to honest journalism."


Whether that is accurate or not would depend on Mr. Childress's definition of what constitutes a tabloid working for a return to honest journalism. As far as what have traditionally been considered "patriotic" or "pro-white" or racialist publications, there is now a much smaller number in existence than when Ibegan The Nationalist Times in 1985. Few new ones of quality and endurance have been started since '85 while many have gone out of existence, and I believethe number will continue to shrink.

[Michael]

Fewer print publication but undoubtedly more internet web site with "’patriotic’ or ‘pro-white’ or racialist publications" giving the same message than have gone out in print form. A different media but the same message. The method of the spreading of the word matters not that the word gets out is what is important.