Mainstream media TRUMPET the un-PC truth!

**Nelson** · 07-15-2007, 03:20 AM

It happens again!

ABC NEWS shows a film exposing Rude E.Jewliani's duplicity. Firefighters (and relatives of colleagues they lost in the fall of the towers) make accusations that HAVE to amount to massive, mind-blowing conspiracy in high places.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3367678

Or maybe they think Rude E.'s just been a little forgetful all these years where those radios are concerned?

BTW, gang, I'm thrilled to see the vigorous action theForum has had recently. Don't stop!

Edited by: Nelson

**Nelson** · 07-23-2007, 10:08 PM

Wow—the Post Eagle Polish-American weekly newspaper, founded by our friend Chester Grabowski, has a big headline for us. Here's the description from Wiki and footage via youtube. The lady tries to push real news on through [img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]while two SMUG JERKS on her news team desperately attempt to pull back the reins on the sure winner! [img]smileys/smiley7.gif[/img]One of them actually asks her "Why are you such a journalist?" Smacznego!

Mika Emilie Leonia Brzezinski (born May 2, 1967) is an American television news journalist, currently a co-host of MSNBC's weekday morning program, Morning Joe. In addition to providing regular commentary, she also reads the news headlines for the program. Brzezinski recently began contributing reports to the NBC Nightly News, and serves as alternating news anchor on Weekend Today. Previously, she was a CBS News anchor and correspondent.

.............On June 26, 2007, near the beginning of Morning Joe, Brzezinski refused to read a report about Paris Hilton's release from jail. One hour later during another news break segment, her producer Andy Jones again pushed the story as the lead, ranking it over Republican Senator Richard Lugar of Indiana's break with President Bush on the Iraq war, which Brzezinski considered more important. After several unsupportive remarks from host Joe Scarborough, she attempted to burn the story's script on the air, but was physically prevented from lighting it by co-host Willie Geist. She then tore up the script, and one hour later, got up and ran another copy of the script through a paper shredder retrieved from Dan Abrams's office.<SUP id=_ref-1 ="reference">[2]</SUP> The incident was quickly popularized on the Internet, and in the days that followed Brzezinski received large quantities of fan mail supporting her on-air protest as a commentary on the tension between 'hard news' and 'entertainment news.'<SUP id=_ref-2 ="reference">[3]</SUP><SUP id=_ref-3 ="reference">[4]</SUP>

Say--this story was (perhaps randomly) linked to it when I cued it up.Isn't it disgusting? Why can't we have presidential figures that look, think AND WERE RAISED like we were instead of a constant stream of internationalist antimatter ghouls?

<A href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VdNcCcweL0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VdNcCcweL0</A>

Note who reports it—smarmy pseuds Wolf Blitzer, Howard Kurtz and Jonah Goldberg. How would you explain three Irish boys being put on the same story yet again?

Here's a mere fraction of the diversity goo on Obama in his main Wiki article. Phew, it gives me the heeby jeebies. Would somebody please explain what makes him so (allegedly) popular? Are people really that brainwashed and dazed by PC PR?

What doesthis creepeven stand for, anyway? I'm afraid to ask. He doesn't give a clue in his main introductory speech, and that can in my "humble" opinion mean only one thing: he's poison!

Born to a Kenyan father and an American mother, Obama grew up in culturally diverse surroundings. He spent most of his childhood in the majority-minority U.S. state of Hawaii and lived for four years in Indonesia. After graduating from Columbia University and Harvard Law School, Obama worked as a community organizer, university lecturer, and civil rights lawyer before entering politics. He served in the Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004, launching his campaign for U.S. Senate in 2003............

Edited by: Nelson

**Nelson** · 08-14-2007, 10:17 PM

Wow—a major British newspaper comes right out with it re "How the government has declared war on English white people"(thansk, Don). This is in fact the real news, i.e. that an account of the problem written in the mode of a Jared Taylor or a Sam Francis gets published in any large newspaper. Wouldn't happen here!

Man bites dog!

http://www2.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/15991/How-the-Gove rnment-has-declared-war-on-white-English-people

The Daily Express is itself a wonder: I had no idea there were any conservative "mainstream" periodicals in the UK. Wikipedia hates it right on schedule, and the more you readits denunciation, the better you feel about life. Best of all, as one should be able to remember, the Express is the paper that gave us the immortal, iconicheadline "Judea declares war on Germany"!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Express

The Express has an average circulation of well over 700,000, the same as the New York Post in NYC, in a country with 4.5 the population of the Express's area of coverage.

I use the New York Post for comparison because it's one of the biggest tabloids in this country and, in deliberately crushing irony, because ithas such a "CONSERVATIVE" reputation. Can you imagine the Express piece in question appearing in the Post, National Review or whatever? NOT A CHANCE—and ditto for any emphasis on elite CONSPIRACY like the Express's long-running coverage of the freakish death of Princess Di!

Man bites dog!

Edited by: Nelson

**Nelson** · 09-07-2007, 05:10 PM

Just in via email:

<DIV>On April 23, 2006, CBS's "60 Minutes" interviewed Tyler Drumheller, the former CIA chief of clandestine operations for Europe, who disclosed that the agency had received documentary intelligence from Naji Sabri, Saddam's foreign minister, that Saddam did not have WMD. "We continued to validate him the whole way through," said Drumheller. "The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming, and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy, to justify the policy."</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Sid. Blumenthal</DIV>

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blument...9/06/bush_wmd/ index_np.html?source=whitelist

**Nelson** · 09-18-2007, 04:20 AM

http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id= 8861497
<H1>Taming Leviathan</H1>
From The Economist print edition
<H2>These are both the best of times and the worst of times for the American-Jewish lobby</H2>

THIS week saw yet another reminder of the awesome power of “the lobby”. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) brought more than 6,000 activists to Washington for its annual policy conference. And they proceeded to live up to their critics' darkest fears.

They heard from the four most powerful people on Capitol Hill—Nancy Pelosi and John Boehner from the House, Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell from the Senate—as well as the vice-president (who called his talk “The United States and Israel: United We Stand”) and sundry other power-brokers. Several first-division presidential candidates held receptions.
<DIV =banner>
<DIV align=center>
< = src="//adcode1.js" =text/>

< = =text/>


< = =text/>


< =1.1 src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/main.economist.com/homepageart;abr=!webtv;sect=nonsubscriber;cou nt=;sect=homepage;pos=v5_art350x300;sz=350x300;til e=1;ord=9288216736333965?" =text/>

< = =text/>


<NO></NO></DIV></DIV>

The display of muscle was almost equalled by the display of unnerving efficiency. There were booths for “congressional check-in”, booths for “delegate banquet troubleshooting”, and booths full of helpful young people. The only discordant note was sounded by a group of a dozen protesters—Orthodox Jews in beards, side-curls and heavy black coats—holding up signs saying “Stop AIPAC”, “Torah forbids Jews dictating foreign policy”, and “Judaism rejects the state of Israel”.

The lobbyists had every reason to feel proud of their work. Congress has more Jewish members than ever before: 30 in the House and a remarkable 13 in the Senate. (There are now more Jews in Congress than Episcopalians.) Both parties are competing with each other to be the “soundest” on Israel. About two-thirds of Americans hold a favourable view of the place.....................Edited by: Nelson

**Nelson** · 10-10-2007, 01:08 PM

This was the fortnight in which Ron Paul went "mainstream." Here's the Sleepy-LookingOne all but calling for people to vote for him. Must be getting ready to retire? [img]smileys/smiley1.gif[/img]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0bEemfowsI

**Nelson** · 10-14-2007, 02:34 AM

Well, there we are: a goyish magazine taken over by Jews openly documents and flaunts raw Jewish power over America, and—as a major Jewish newspaper reports—a Jewish pundit with a thirdpublication kvells that Jews are now a huge force in ameriKa, anti-semitism is a thing of the past, et al. Of course they're going tohave their cake and eat it too: they may sing "ding dong the witch is dead" all day and all night over the neutralization of the KKK et al,but don't expect the ADL to stop saturating the national consciousness with anti-semitismania.

Easily ten years ago somebody similar issued a report declaring the exact same news about Jews, tallying how many reign in each profession and concluding "it is no longer possible for Jews to claim outsider status in America" etc. etc.This made as loud a noise as Mearsheimer and Walt have, but only for a short while.

Ofcoursethere was not one iota less whining after that about supposed persecution by Jews or the need for us "goyim" to remember remember remember how rotten we've supposedly treating them.

I've been looking high and low for the above report but it's flown the coop somehow. It being amply covered by Christian News. If anybody has a clue who it was or by whom, please let me know.

This is another lying article title for the collection. It makes it sound like it's only about Jewish dominance of one magazine, not in its tally of the world's present movers and shakers.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPAr ticle%2FShowFull&cid=1191257286817

Jewish power dominates at 'Vanity Fair'

It's a list of "the world's most powerful people," 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It's an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power.

More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.

It's a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media. Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list - not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands.

Yet the list doesn't appear to have generated concern so far, instead drawing expressions of satisfaction and pride from the lone Jewish commentator who's responded in writing.

Published between ads for Chanel and Prada, Dior and Yves Saint Laurent, it's the 2007 version of "The Vanity Fair 100," the glossy American magazine's annual October ranking of the planet's most important people. Populated by a Cohen and a Rothschild, a Bloomberg and a Perelman, the list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.

Joseph Aaron, the editor of The Chicago Jewish News, thinks it's a list his readers should "feel very, very good about."

"Talk about us being accepted into this society, talk about us having power in this society," Aaron wrote this week, in apparent reference to Jewish life in the United States. "Talk about anti-Semitism being a thing of the past, talk about Jews no longer needing to be afraid to be visible and influential" ..............

PS As I write, I'm as usual (for Saturday nights) listening to the Bob Jones radiostation's programs of classical music with comment. The show currently airing, Voices That Live, just happens to be featuring profiles of two hyper-chosenite opera singers of yore, "Richard Tucker" (Ruvn Ticker—synagogue choirmaster who married the sister of "Jan Peerce") and Hans Schmidt, synagogue cantor. The announcer is superciliously and endlessly harping on their Jewish backgrounds and lifestyles. Mind you, these programs were recorded years or decades ago, before the age of Mearsheimer! The host (actually the dominant cohost) has always struck me as very hoity-toity, not at all typical of BJU's undertakings.Edited by: Nelson

**Nelson3** · 07-17-2009, 12:58 AM

Wowl ultra-liberal, hellish-hedonist Rolling Stone trashes </span>Obamanomics -- oddly, without mentioning Obama himself. Warning: filthy language.</span>
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
The Big Takeover
</h1>
<h2 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
The global economic crisis isn't about money - it's about power. How
Wall Street insiders are using the bailout to stage a revolution
</h2>
MATT TAIBBI http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...93903/the_big_ takeover/print

Wait a minute -- we heard no end of sneering references to Reaganomics through the 1980s and beyond. Where's the word Obamanomics hiding?

**Nelson3** · 08-15-2009, 04:12 AM

It's all coming out in the open! This is rich rich RICH.

http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=1791002<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><h2 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Neo-Nazi hate, courtesy of the CHRC</h2>

Ezra Levant,
National Post

Published:Wednesday, July 15, 2009</span>
(CHRC = Canadian Human Rights Comm)

keywords hatemongering hatemongers splc ADL "anti-racist thought police </font>

**Nelson3** · 08-21-2009, 03:20 AM

<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">THE CIA, SIBERIA AND THE $5M BAR BILL</h1>
<h2 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">A FEDERAL COURT CASE REVEALS A BIZARRE TALE OF POST-9/11 OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN</h2> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08162009...on/opedcolumni sts/the_cia__siberia_and_the_5m_bar_bill_184851.htm

BlackistedNews summary:

<div ="title">CIA's Black Helicopters End Up In Court
</div> <div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">More
than seven years ago a group of Americans traveled to Siberia to buy a
pair of Russian Mi-17 helicopters for the CIA’s post-9/11 clandestine
operations in Afghanistan. As with many “black” programs, the contract
had elements of craziness: Contracting officials paid the
multimillion-dollar contract on a credit card at a local El Paso bar
and then used the credit card rebate to redecorate their office; the
team traveled under the guise of being private contractors; and the
charter crew transporting the group abandoned the team in Russia in the
middle of the night.</div>

Edited by: Nelson3

**Nelson3** · 09-06-2009, 05:20 AM

http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/tar.../2009/08/deten tion-camps-now-exposed-in-mainstream-media.html

<h3 ="entry-er">Detention Camps Now Exposed in Mainstream Media</h3>

<div>
<div>

San Francisco Chronicle: </font>RULE BY FEAR OR RULE BY LAW</div></font></div></font>

<div>This article appeared on page B - 7 of the San Francisco Chronicle</div>
<div> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../a/2008/02/04/ ED5OUPQJ7.DTL</font></font></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>A commentary on this article:</font></div>
<div>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qf9lzFqZc0</font></div></div>
<div></div>
<div>Rule by fear or rule by law?
Lewis Seiler,Dan Hamburg</font></div>
<div></div>
<div>Monday, February 4, 2008</font></div>
<div></div>

<div>"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating
any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of
his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all
totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."</div>
<div> - Winston Churchill, Nov. 21, 1943</div>
<div></div>
<div>Since 9/11, and seemingly without the notice of most Americans, the
federal government has assumed the authority to institute martial law,
arrest a wide swath of dissidents (citizen and noncitizen alike), and detain
people without legal or constitutional recourse in the event of "an
emergency influx of immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid
development of new programs." </div>
<div></div>
<div>Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of single-bid
contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) to
build detention camps</font> at undisclosed locations within the United States.
The government has also contracted with several companies to build
thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly
to transport detainees.</font> </div>
<div></div>
<div>According to diplomat and author Peter Dale Scott, the KBR contract is
part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal
the removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential </font>terrorists."</div>
<div></div>
<div>Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, have
complained about these contracts, saying that more taxpayer dollars
should not go to taxpayer-gouging Halliburton. But the real question is:
What kind of "new programs" require the construction and refurbishment
of detention facilities in nearly every state of the union with the capacity to
house perhaps millions of people?</font></div>
<div></div>
<div>Sect. 1042 of the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), "Use of
the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies," gives the executive the
power to invoke martial law. For the first time in more than a century, the
president is now authorized to use the military in response to "a natural
disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any other condition in
which the President determines</font> that domestic violence has occurred to the
extent that state officials cannot maintain public order."</div>
<div></div>
<div>The Military Commissions Act of 2006, rammed through Congress just
before the 2006 midterm elections, allows for the indefinite imprisonment
of anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on a list of
"terrorist" organizations, or who speaks out against the government's
policies. The law calls for secret trials for citizens and noncitizens alike. </font></div>
<div></font></div>
<div>Also in 2007, the White House quietly issued National Security Presidential
Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure "continuity of government" in the event
of what the document vaguely calls a "catastrophic emergency." Should
the president determine that such an emergency has occurred, he and he
alone is empowered to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure
"continuity of government." This could include everything from canceling
elections to suspending the Constitution to launching a nuclear attack.
Congress has yet to hold a single hearing on NSPD-51.</div>
<div></div>
<div>U.S. Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County) has come up with a
new way to expand the domestic "war on terror." Her Violent Radicalization
and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 (HR1955), which passed
the House by the lopsided vote of 404-6, would set up a commission to
"examine and report upon the facts and causes" of so-called violent
radicalism and extremist ideology, then make legislative recommendations
on combatting it.</div>
<div></div>
<div>According to commentary in the Baltimore Sun, Rep. Harman and her
colleagues from both sides of the aisle believe the country faces a native
brand of terrorism, and needs a commission with sweeping investigative
power to combat it. </div>
<div></div>
<div>A clue as to where Harman's commission might be aiming is the Animal
Enterprise Terrorism Act, a law that labels those who "engage in sit-ins,
civil disobedience, trespass, or any other crime in the name of animal
rights" as terrorists. Other groups in the crosshairs could be anti-abortion
protesters, anti-tax agitators, immigration activists, environmentalists,
peace demonstrators, Second Amendment rights supporters ... the list
goes on and on. According to author Naomi Wolf, the National
Counterterrorism Center holds the names of roughly 775,000 "terror
suspects" with the number increasing by 20,000 per month.</div>
<div></div>
<div>What could the government be contemplating that leads it to make
contingency plans to detain without recourse millions of its own citizens? </div>
<div></div>
<div>The Constitution does not allow the executive to have unchecked power
under any circumstances. The people must not allow the president to use
the war on terrorism to rule by fear instead of by law.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Lewis Seiler is the president of Voice of the Environment, Inc. Dan
Hamburg, a former congressman, is executive director.</div>
<div></div>
<div>This article appeared on page B - 7 of the San Francisco Chronicle</div>
<div>Read more: </div>
<div> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../a/2008/02/04/ ED5OUPQJ7.DTL#ixzz0PWsEse8X</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-
bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/04/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL#ixzz0PWsEse8 X</div></font>
<div>
==============</div>
<div>
<div>Washington Post: Obama Endorses Indefinite Detention Without Trial</div>
<div> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...rticle/2009/05 /21/AR2009052104045.html</font></div>
<div></div>
<div>Rachel Maddow on Obama's Indefinite detention ideas 5-21-09</div>
<div>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8J_lcHwkvc</font></div>
<div>==============</div></div></font>

<div>
<div>
<h1>

Camp FEMA - MIAC Report</font></h1>
<h1>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iBcI05t5tA</font></h1></div></div>

What you will see in this message:</font>
<div>1. The US Army National Guard's help wanted ad for "</font>Internment / Resettlement Specialists</font>" in text. http://www.military.net/job/639/Internment+specialist</font></font></font></div>
<div></div>
<div>2. Definition of Internment- imprisonment or confinement<sup ="reference" id="cite_ref-0">[</span>1]</span></font></sup> of people, commonly in large groups, without trial. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment</font> </font></span></font></div>
<div></span></font></div>
<div>3.The US Army's regulation's for managing a concentration camp right from the US Army's own web site. http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf</font></font></font></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>4. Videos of some of the Foreign Troopsthat are already here.</font> </font></div>
<div>http://www.clipser.com/watch_video/1336758</font></font></div>
<div></div></font></div>
<div>5. Videos of a few of the concentration camp's that have already been built. </font></div>
<div>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9dgqKmJ50&NR=1</font></font></div>
<div></div>
<div>6. </font>Video of </font>Undercover FBI agent Larry Grathwohl telling how he sat in on the meetingdiscussing liquidation (</font>Internment Resettlement)</font> of Americans in "re-education camps". http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5742</font></span></font></span></span></span></span></font></span></font></span></span></span></span></font></div>
<div></span></font></span></span></span></span></div>
<div>7. Videos before the House and Senate showing testimony on the plans to declare martial law. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug0IL7k3elQ&NR=1</font> </span></font></span></span></span></span></div>
<div>http://tinyurl.com/lghl4e</font></span></font></span></span></span></span></div></font>

**LG83** · 10-01-2009, 09:06 PM

Originally Posted by Nelson

She then tore up the script, and one hour later, got up and ran another copy of the script through a </font>paper shredder</font> retrieved from </font>Dan Abrams</font>'s office.<sup id="_ref-1">[2]</sup> The incident was quickly popularized on the </font>......</font>

Didn't Dan Abram notice his paper shredder
was stolen?

**Nelson3** · 10-14-2009, 11:33 PM

I can't believe it -- alternative healing methods are going mainstream. The doctor industry is having to give in and start offering them on-site?

If this article appeared in liberal diversitarian heathen AAPR magazine, something strange is really going on.l... possibly good. Truth will out, and crime does not pay.

http://www.aarpmagazine.org/health/best_medicine.html
The Best Medicine</font>

By Sheree Crute, March & April 2008

Once upon a time mainstream doctors looked askance at
alternative treatments, especially when it came to chronic diseases.
Now, the medical establishment is embracing a new way to heal</span>

...........Chernoff-Kwiatkowski's change of luck came after deciding to try
something new. For years she'd trekked the 25 miles from her home to
Houston, to be treated at the University of Texas's highly regarded
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. But somehow she hadn't noticed the </span>Place of Wellness, a pretty space inconspicuously tucked amid M.D. Anderson's pink and gray granite buildings.......

.</span>
LATER... An absolutely ultimate link on this thread subject was just (</span></font>4/9/10)</span></font> posted here:</span>

http://www.anu.org/forum/forum_posts...727&PN=1&a mp;a mp;a mp;a mp;TPN=1</font></font><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">LATER......</font> This is priceless! Talk about saying the unsayable!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZgve...;feature=email
</font><h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="watch-line-title">
Cafferty Slams Obama and Dems For Their Response To Arizona Immigration Law Video.flv</span></h1>

Edited by: Nelson3

**Nelson3** · 08-23-2010, 04:52 AM

Woo hoo hoo..... this is almost too true to be funny.

The "Blabbler" looks like a Chosenite too!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4PC8Luqiws
Overcome Stress By Visualizing It As A Greedy, Hook-Nosed
Race Of Creatures

Thread: Mainstream media TRUMPET the un-PC truth!

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Posting Permissions