An article entitled "USA: Scientific doubt grows over Mother Africa Theory (Cradle of Mankind)"
http://www.africancrisis.co.za/Artic...?ID=16219&
"I have my own ideas: I would not be surprised to find that humans and much life, has been wiped off continents and large areas of the earth more than once, and that following such large-scale destruction, humans from neighbouring areas recolonised that area. I would not be surprised if they discover that continents have been colonised by humans more than once. Something like a super-volcano could eradicate all life over large areas, and such events have been quite common."
-Jan Lamprecht, African Crisis
************************************************
Interesting comment by Jan L
*************************************************
"In the light of these results, we propose that Asia has played an important role in the colonisation of Europe." - Sapa-AFP
*****************************************
Huh?
An article entitled "Russian geneticists disprove “Out of Africa” claim"
http://cofcc.org/2012/06/russian-gen...-africa-claim/Recent fossil discoveries in central Asia have turned the “out of Africa” theory of human evolution upside down. Now two Russian geneticists show that DNA disproves the theory. There findings were published in Advances in Anthropology. The entire article can be read online.
The "out of Africa" dogma is PC at its most ridiculously blatant. It's about time it was taken down a notch, but don't expect this news to become "common knowledge" for another 50-100 years on.
I agree. It is not logical to think all of the races evolved from a being that became blacks in Africa. It is more logical to think that since there were SO many different hominids running around in history, different races came from different sources. I think blacks are another species of Homo, perhaps erectus. This would explain the vast differences between them and us, and the prognathian jaw, smaller brain, etc.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/species.html