Illegal Immigrants

[dickiedoo]

I am really concerned with the War! - [img]smileys/smiley6.gif[/img]


No, not the "perpetual war" against terrorism but a war much more serious. That is the conquest of America right here, right now, on our soil. The war that is being conducted by insurgent troops, disguised as civilians, claiming "peaceful" intentions,infiltrating through our southern border.


These 'troops' are infiltrating our borders being aided by traitors within this country. Many of these traitors are in very places.


The "war" is very evident in many of our southern states. Los Angelos,Mexico, formerly known as Los Angelos, CA is now well over 50% (I have heard 70%) mexican. 800,000gringos have fled California last year alone. It is becoming a dangerious "battle-zone!"


I subscribe to many of the "free press" media, and of course surf the "free press" on the internet. One thing that really bugs me is the use of the term "Illegal Immigrant!"


I'll copy an email I just sent to an internet journalist about the fallacy of this term.


I feel that this term is first of all incorrect. (An oxymoran) and that it has probably been leaked into our correspondencd and conversations to purposely water down who and what these "TROOPS" really are.


I wish that whoever reads this and hopefully agrees, will forward this proposal to their list(s) so that more correct terminology might be used to describe these insurgents.


Here is a copy of my email.....
<DIV>Hi, Deanna</DIV>
<DIV>I just read your May 28, article (NewsWithViews.com). I agree with you 99.9% </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>The one thing that bothered meis the phrase, "Illegal Immigrant(s)." You and all of the other journalists should promote, when composing articles relative to our 'loose' border(s),that these perpetrators are not "Illegal Immigrants!" They certainly are illegal but they are NOT IMMIGRANTS! They are ILLEGAL TRESPASSERS! ['Illegal Immigrants' is an oxymoron. (An immigrant is already a citizen or is in the process.)This phraseis the result of some pretty cleverly designedphysco-babblemeant to water down the opposersas they use the clever phrase in there opposition speech or writings.]</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Using the word immigrantapplies legality, sympathy, or a 'guilt trip' to many who are reading and discussing this horrible invasion by foreign insurgents, most of whom are NOT coming here to enjoy the 'good life.' The mantras, "This country is made up of immigrants...," "You or your ancestors were immigrants...," an so forth, are meant to shame the opposition into silence.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>It would not have such a 'good ring,' while attempting to silence opposition for them to say, "You or your ancestors were also ILLEGAL TRESPASSERS!"</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>ILLEGAL is directly associated with 'Criminal!" These trespassers are criminals. They are foreign troops disguised as non-combatants. They are 'at war' with the United States of America! We should treat them as such.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>All these 'guest worker,' un-documented alien and illegal immigrant 'handles' are code words to hide who and what they really are!</DIV>

[Warren Wilson]

"dickiedoo" makes an excellentpoint.I've not heard either Pat Buchanan or David Duke refer to the illegal Mexican invaders as "troops" and/or "insurgents." Henceforth I will adopt this very accurate terminology in my own writing.

[Don Wassall]

Good idea, dickiedoo. This is the issue with the greatest potential to wake Middle America out of its trance, short of an economic collapse. The problem is being recognized more and more. The Bush administration's refusal to seal off the southern border even after 9/11 is starting to open a lot of eyes -- both to the desire of both monopoly parties to flood the U.S. with Third Worlders, and of the phoniness of the "War on Terror."

[ChildvonVinland]

700,000,000 yards of barbed wire fence from Home Depot.

Problem solved! [img]smileys/smiley17.gif[/img]

[Don Wassall]

If there is a major terrorist incident inside the United States and the perpetrators are found to have entered the country from Mexico, all hell is gonna break loose. This possible scenario alone is forcing Republicans and "conservatives" to reconsider their previous support for letting the entire Third World enter the U.S. at their leisure and many are now coming around to supporting a sane border and immigration policy. It may be in conjunction with the police state fast enveloping us, but at this point we'll take our victories where we find them.

[Michael]

If there is a major terrorist incident inside
the United States and the perpetrators are found to have entered the
country from Mexico, all hell is gonna break loose. This possible
scenario alone is forcing Republicans and "conservatives" to reconsider
their previous support for letting the entire Third World enter the
U.S. at their leisure and many are now coming around to supporting a
sane border and immigration policy. It may be in conjunction with
the police state fast enveloping us, but at this point we'll take our
victories where we find them.

As if the liberal and neocon elites would not come up with a cover
story, so that the blame won’t be put on a group of foreigners crossing
the Mexican border. And accused all the people who show proof
that they did “conspiracy nuts.” Unless, the incident came without
warning so the powers that be could be away that day (which the elites
seems to so often be far away from a terrorist strike even if they
would normally be there.) If the elites had no warning, then they would
be conflicted safety or cheap Mestizo servants. As those two
conflicting factions within the powers that be fought it out the truth
would escape and as you said “…all hell is gonna break
loose.”

[Aceriter]

Did we all see Lou Dobbs on CNN Thurs. June 9th? He had a clip of a spokesman for the Council On Foreign Relations speaking to some political body advocating the elimination of all borders between the USA and Canada and Mexico, and the free flow of people and goods in all three countries. I could hardly believe my ears! This is a perfect program for the eventual destruction of the United States of America as we now know it. It seems the John Birch Society was right about the CFR. They are the hidden government of the USA after all.

Aceriter

[Michael]

The “social contract” of the western nations only works with
Whites. Other groups the only control government has over them is
direct force or bribery (give away programs). As more and more
parts of the country comes under control of non-whites the government
has that much less control. It is ironic that by the government
encouraging the increase of the non-white population, they reduce the
area that the government has control over. As is well
know many non-white areas are extremely dangerous places run by
gangs. It could even be argued that the gangs are
governments in the areas they control. They have rules (laws)
that are very brutal by our standards but we must remember we are
dealing with non-whites. They have small armies that fight each
other and the government over turf. In places, they even levy
taxes (extortion). It is very ironic that the governmental elites
in their attempt to bring the Whites farther under their control and
increase their personnel wealth have lost control over vast section of
the country and its wealth. In the end, the neocon/liberal elites
will even lose control over the Whites as nationalist leaders emerge,
for the neocon/liberal elites broke the “social contract.”
Edited by: Michael

[Scronx]

<H1 ="line">Private university planned for illegal immigrants</H1>
<H3>
<DIV ="timestamp">The Business Journal of Phoenix - April 14, 2006</DIV></H3>


A charter school in South Phoenix is starting a university for Hispanics and undocumented immigrants as emotions and legal maneuvering over illegal immigration reach new heights.


Esperanza Montessori Academy quietly is working with Catholic University of Trujillo in Peru to build a school in South Phoenix for Hispanic students who can't afford to go to a traditional college.


http://phoenix.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2006/04/17/st ory5.html


Edited by: nelson

[Wolfram]

I might have referred to Yggdrasil's September 2001 article previously, "The End Game," but in any event it is worth re-reading. His statement.,


"We have an elite that has no particular interest in the survival of the American majority - an elite that openly advertises its view that the present majority is expendable and openly advertises its willingness to import a replacement population"


seemed a bit far-fetched at the time, but it seems to be coming true.


Complete article:

http://home.ddc.net/ygg/ms/ms-51.htm

[Michael]

Not unusual for the elite of an empire not to trust their people and to bring in new peoples to replace and rule over them even. Rome being a classic example to the point that the Roman people disappeared but to varying degrees it has happened in other empires as well. In time the ones they bring in will try to remove the old elite as well. Today many elite are not the original elite (often refer to as WASP) so it appears the old elite are being pushed out by a group that they formed an alliance with to help them rule over the Whites.

[Wolfram]

Not unusual for the elite of an empire not to trust their people and to bring in new peoples to replace and rule over them even. Rome being a classic example to the point that the Roman people disappeared but to varying degrees it has happened in other empires as well. In time the ones they bring in will try to remove the old elite as well. Today many elite are not the original elite (often refer to as WASP) so it appears the old elite are being pushed out by a group that they formed an alliance with to help them rule over the Whites.

Very astute observation, Michael.


Consider the Federal Reserve, the Bush neocon crew,and, especially--the media. Where once we had William Randolph Hearst, Joseph Medill Patterson, Col. Robert R. McCormick and others, we now have--well, you know who. Also, on Wall Street, it appears that Goldman Sachs has pulled ahead of Brown Brothers Harriman.


That is the problem with the corporate mentality--they can't see further ahead than the next quarterly report.

An Amazing Week! 192,000,000 new Mestizos, Anyone?


George the Porge has to resort to such an open absurdity as "sending the National Guard to the Mexican border," even seventh-graders can see through this garbage.


Bush-ite troops on the border are more likely to be used to counteract the work of the Minutemen and sympathetic citizen groups, such thatthe hordes of Mexicans can be ushered into USA unharrassed.


But to announce that we will bring in 200 million new Mexicans -- gosh. It's like a chapter out of the "Protocols of Zion" where we make a pronouncement so absurd that the masses of mindless whites will buy it with nary a care.


But I've heard even my moronic relatives, liberals or nitwits all, raising their eyebrows and questioning the idea of importing the whole country of Mexico into their neighborhoods.


A nifty move by Bush and the Club-of-Rome types .... Circumvent the "Stop Illegal Immigration" impulse by simply making the mass invasion quite legal.

[Scronx]

This must be what you're talking about. People laugh when I tell them the politicians really hate us and are trying to wipe us off the map of history -- will this convince anybody? Any fool should be able to see that the Permanent Regime exists for the sole purpose of ruining everything that we, the people value -- but the strange fact is that even most "fools" still refuse to see it.


I just had dinner with a smart woman who DOES see it all and her husband who simply grumbles that we shouldn't judge the politicians because we've never seen what a tough job they have to do, etc. Weird world, I'm telling you!
<DIV>
<STYLE></STYLE>

<DIV>


Dear Fellow Republicans, Conservatives, Constitutionalists, and other Patriotic Americans:


Below is a Washington Times piece describingtwo Heritage Foundation studies (read both studies in fullhere: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/bg1936.cfmand http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1076.cfm)on how Bush's amnesty bill that is currently in the Senate could increase immigration by 100-200 MILLION PEOPLE OVER THE NEXT 20 YEARS!!!!!! and how poverty, welfare dependency, and crime would SKYROCKET!!! (Current U.S. population is 300 million).


Bush, the Senate 'Amnesty Pack' and the rest of these Open Borders freaks should be committed to a rubber room where they belong.


Chris Golden


Washington Times piece:
<H2>Bill permits 193 million more aliens by 2026</H2>


The Senate immigration reform bill would allow for up to 193 million new legal immigrants -- a number greater than 60 percent of the current U.S. population -- in the next 20 years, according to a study released yesterday.
"The magnitude of changes that are entailed in this bill -- and are largely unknown -- rival the impact of the creation of Social Security or the creation of the Medicare program," said Robert Rector, senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation who conducted the study.
Although the legislation would permit 193 million new immigrants in the next two decades, Mr. Rector estimated that it is more likely that about 103 million new immigrants actually would arrive in the next 20 years.
Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican who conducted a separate analysis that reached similar results, said Congress is "blissfully ignorant of the scope and impact" of the bill, which has bipartisan support in the Senate and has been praised by President Bush.
"This Senate is not ready to pass legislation that so significantly changes our future immigration policy," he said yesterday. "The impact this bill will have over the next 20 years is monumental and has not been thought through."
The 614-page "compromise" bill -- hastily cobbled together last month by Republican Sens. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Mel Martinez of Florida -- would give illegal aliens who have been in the U.S. two years or longer a right to citizenship. Illegals who have been here less than two years would have to return to their home countries to apply for citizenship.
Although that "amnesty" would be granted to about 10 million illegals, the real growth in the immigrant population would come later.
As part of the bill, the annual flow of legal immigrants allowed into the U.S. would more than double to more than 2 million annually. In addition, the guest-worker program in the bill would bring in 325,000 new workers annually who could later apply for citizenship.
That population would grow exponentially from there because the millions of new citizens would be permitted to bring along their extended families. Also, Mr. Sessions said, the bill includes "escalating caps," which would raise the number of immigrants allowed in as more people seek to enter the U.S.
"The impact of this increase in legal immigration dwarfs the magnitude of the amnesty provisions," said Mr. Rector, who has followed Congress for 25 years. He called the bill "the most dramatic piece of legislation in my experience."
Mr. Rector based his numerical projection on the number of family members that past immigrants have sponsored.
Immigration into the U.S. would become an "entitlement," Mr. Sessions said. "The decision as to who may come will almost totally be controlled by the desire of the individuals who wish to immigrate to the United States rather than by the United States government."
Although most opposition has come from conservatives, liberals are growing increasingly uneasy about increasing the competition for American jobs -- especially the low-paying ones.
Sen. Byron L. Dorgan, North Dakota Democrat, said yesterday that he would introduce an amendment to strip out the guest-worker program, warning that the legislation would "pull apart the middle class in this country."
One of the most alarming aspects of the bill, opponents say, is that it eliminates a long-standing policy of U.S. immigration law that prohibits anyone from gaining permanent status here who is considered "likely to become a public charge," meaning welfare or other government subsidy.
This change is particularly troublesome because the bill also slants legal immigration away from highly skilled and highly educated workers to the unskilled and uneducated, who are far more likely to require public assistance. In addition, adult immigrants will be permitted to bring along their parents, who would eventually be eligible for Social Security even though they had never paid into it.
Mr. Rector estimated that the eventual cost of the bill to the American taxpayer would be about $50 billion per year. Mr. Sessions said he hopes to educate his colleagues about what's in the bill before they vote on it, but there's little evidence that they're interested.
Last month, he asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to conduct an in-depth study and hold hearings into the fiscal impact of the bill as well as the impact the bill would have on future immigration. The committee produced no study and held one hearing strictly on the fiscal aspects of the bill. Only three of his fellow panel members showed up, he said.


</DIV></DIV>Edited by: nelson

National Guard on the Border ... To Make Damn Sure It's Open !!
Here's the scam: Bush (or the next Zionazi) will saturate the border area with [loyal] Guard and Army troops. At the prearranged moment, these will disperse or kill the Minutemen and any other Gringos on the North side. Then they will gape open the "fence" and usher in bizillions of Mexicanos. They will maintain the open gap for years, intitiating the new Aztlan. Your tax dollars at work !

[Michael]

Estimates of 240,000 illegal alien sex offenders. in USA! And that is reportedly a conservative estimated! Also, reports that “…93 sex offenders and 12 serial sexual offenders…”
cross the border illegally everyday!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...ARTICLE_ID=504 41



What has gotten into some of our people! Do they not comprehend that the illegal alien they hire to mow their lawn or trim their hedges or whatever could be a rapist and/or murder? Do they not care enough about their own family and that of their friends and neighbors to either do their own yard work or pay a little more to get it down by American? I understand that people who hire and insist that illegal aliens be allowed in and supported by the taxpayers so they can get cheap labor are a VERY selfish lot but you would expect that they would not have such dangerous people around their own homes but they do! Most do not have the brains to comprehend (at least before something happens) how they are gambling every time they bring an illegal to their home to do work they are to lazy to do themselves or to cheap to hire an American to do! But others may simple view their families (like their nation) as an asset that if they get raped or murdered it is worth it because the labor is so cheap!

[Scronx]

Amurricans have only one thought in their heads when it comes to any minority group's drawbacks: it would be racist to complain about that, so I'm not going to be the one. They don't actually believe it, they merely believe they have to act like they believe it.


Lots of luck expecting them EVER to address the hell of diversity as long as there are chosenites to blab from the TV pulpit that whites are evil and have to atone for millennia of racism and "holocaust".


This is not a joke, I'm not blowing off steam, TV is god to them and as long as it lasts its sick, poisonous false gospel will trump all others in their "minds".

[Don Wassall]

This is not a joke, I'm not blowing off steam, TV is god to them and as long as it lasts its sick, poisonous false gospel will trump all others in their "minds".

Very true. Even when a dittohead type is exposed to reality (for example a nationalist publication) and he seems to be thinking just a tad, whatever verboten thoughts he had are quickly overwhelmed and forgotten as soon as he returns home and turns on his television/pacifier.

[aryanfreeman]

Edited-AFEdited by: aryanfreeman

The Congressmen suggested the concrete wall at the border ... to keep US from escaping. They'll put one on the northern border as well