Let's have it. Is he delusional, alcoholic, drugged, dry drunk, suffering dementia, paranoid schizophrenic, what?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw4Bhmm22xo&NR=1
Many of these links have duplicate stuff—the scene that starts this one has to be "under the influences" of something bad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4DykmZz_YA&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgPShicCCTA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqLvB...;mode=related& amp;search=
Promote the NationalisTimes—order and deploy extra copies—bring all whom you know into the Forum! Fresh opportunities arise constantly. ANU.ORG is THE number one news page of them all. \"JUST DO IT”...
<DIV>http://www.matrixmasters.com/blog/bushcrime/bushcrime01.html</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Ronald Reagan on George W. Bush
This is a quote worth reading from the just published <A href="http://webmail.charter.net/do/redirect?url=http%253A%252F%252Fmatrixmasters.com% 252Fstore%252Fshop.php%253Fc%253D001%2526n%253D100 0%2526i%253D006087600X%2526x%253DThe_Reagan_Diarie s" target="_blank">REAGAN
DIARIES</A>. The entry is dated May 17, 1986..
"A moment I've been dreading. George brought his ne're-do-well son
around this morning and asked me to find the kid a job. Not the
political one who lives in Florida. The one who hangs around here
all the time looking shiftless. This so-called kid is already almost
40 and has never had a real job. Maybe I'll call Kinsley over at The
New Republic and see if they'll hire him as a contributing editor or
something. That looks like easy work."</DIV>
Promote the NationalisTimes—order and deploy extra copies—bring all whom you know into the Forum! Fresh opportunities arise constantly. ANU.ORG is THE number one news page of them all. \"JUST DO IT”...
Originally Posted by Nelson
All of the above, plus a few more that we haven't thought about.
There are videos where sound and sight are slowed down to make Bush look drunk -- works quite well actually -- but there are videos where that's not needed.
George W. Bush tries to answer a very simple question...</span>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8ChWyZZAaA&NR=1
No, Youtube, he tries not </span>to answer!..... Course he doesn't have to try very hard. Anybody remember the time when te people finally noticed Bushy boy gave speeches with a bulge of some kind on his back under his suit jacket? He was later asked about it on-air by some talking head -- and simply smiled it off, knowing his questioner would blithely flutter with hm on to the next topic.
I'm just now emailing a compatriot on a project and it reminded me that as Boy George Bush was foaming at the mouth about the need to smash Iraq because of the nonexistent WMDs, he actually promised to "rid the world of evildoers".
I have been throwing this up to neocons ever since as proof that the W was stark raving mad -- and at this odd moment thought to google the phrase just to verify that this incredibly insane utterance actually occurred. Fortunately, 840 webpages still attest it:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&a...mp;as_epq=rid+ the+world+of+evildoers&as_oq=&as_eq=&n um=10& lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&a mp;as_qdr= all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_ nlo=&a s_nhi=&safe=images
Anybody half awake knows that the proper response to W's statement would have come from military police:
"Yes, Georgie, you surely will when you grow up. But it's time for your nap -- please step into this wagon with all the nice comfy padding......."
OR
"Yes, Mr. President. And now we'll be happy to take you to that appointment at St. Elizabeth's hospital....."
"We will rid the world of evildoers" -- hah! How could anybody have believed a word he said after that? And people say Hitler was an insane, bellicose maniac?
The higher up you are in politics, the less sane you have to act and talk, because the more credence the masses automatically accord you. Once you're president you can claim you're going to drive your car to Pluto and the talking heads will merely start chatting it up as a new issue with a "pro" and a "con" side.
Looks like some gooooood links in that link!
Edited by: Nelson3
Yummy, tangy comments here [img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img]
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives...ush_says_kanye .php
<h1>Bush Says Kanye West’s Attack Was Low Point of His Presidency</h1>
ANUN<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><h2 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
Bush the Warmonger in His Own Words </h2>
<div style="width: 100%; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
Why should George W. Bush have been "angry" to learn in late 2007 of
the "high-confidence" unanimous judgment of all 16 U.S. intelligence
agencies that Iran had stopped working on a nuclear weapon four years
earlier? Seems to me he might have said "Hot Dog!" rather than curse
under his breath. Nowhere in his memoir, Decision Points, is Bush’s
bizarre relationship with truth so manifest as when he describes his
dismay at learning that the intelligence community had redeemed itself
for its lies about Iraq by preparing an honest National Intelligence
Estimate on Iran. As the Bush-book makes abundantly clear, that NIE
rammed an iron rod through the wheels of the juggernaut rolling toward
war. http://www.counterpunch.org/mcgovern11232010.html </div>