Ah, but we DO know they're there. Local police, people,and federal agents know they're there. The federal government knows they're there. Patriots and even the sheeple across the land know they're there thanks to CNN articles like this. The question is how do we arouse indignation against the Jewish fatcats who rule the world acording to their own selfish agenda -- one plank of which is positively known to be filling the formerly thrivingwhite Christian countries with aliens, in particular the refuse of miserable third-world hellholes, be they Mexico, China or Somalia.
By "refuse" I mean the least assimilable underclass of element of these countries. The African tribes discarded their misfits and criminals in our direction through the slave trade, Cuba booted ONE HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND "refugees" in our direction in the 1980 "Mariel boatlift," resulting in a crime wave of new and colorful cast........and so it goes with other countries today -- with the gleeful approval and help of the abovementioned money power. Our own rulers are today the scum of the earth -- you know, Bushes, Clintons et al. -- and are politically 100% in line with their owner-operators, the same crowd with the funny names and odd contempt for "baseball, apple pie and mom". Thus the Agenda goes forth under president after president, generation after generation of "leaders" in the ever-more-diverse land of the fee and the home of the slave.
Michael asked above, "What does one do with criminal aliens who homelands won’t take them back?These people are criminals and have no rights in our land!" Couldn't agree more, and here's a more concrete answer than I gave earlier: The Bible solution would be to bring them (like ANYONE that breaks the law) to speedy trial and carry out the verdict promptly. Those convicted of murder are executed. Those guilty of theft or damage will pay it back fourfold. If they refuse (as the criminal mind often does), they are executed too.
But there will be NO prisons!!!! Prisons are a hell on earth, a university for crooks, a cancerous growth, a creation of fallen man that has no place in God's economy.
This is the system that works, as well,and effectively discourages misbehavior. There are ways to deal with repeat offenders but the details escape me now. Most of what I've just said is derived from a sensational cartoon leaflet “America Must Turn To God‘s Law”. It's listed here along with much else of keen interest here:
[from]http://www.amprom.org/Edited by: nelson
Solid lessons can be learned about the harm that massive immigration from the third can bring,and can easily be seen by the riots in france,and Australia,and the horrors that every day citizens encounter in England.
The problem is that a vast number of American citizens do not realize the scope of these events,or that they are headed this way,because they have been sold out by the mainstream media, The Nationalist Times has covered these events,when others barely mentioned them.
The citizens of above mentioned countries have been disarmed,and therefore cannot protect themselves.Most of the predators involved are in fact armed,and they realize that it would be "racist" for authorities to challenge them!
I have heard American blacks make statements like,"More White folks are packing heat these days"! That tells them that they can expect resistance,if they choose to attack,hence the crime rate drops when folks are armed.
One could say that the problems are already here just look at what happen in New Orleans and all the riots that often go unreported except maybe in the local press and maybe not even there. All the non-whites crime aimed at Whites. Of course, as you mentioned, the well-armed White population in this country is holding them back from a full frontal assault.
In the end, the non-whites will likely in some White country try a takeover bid likely it will be crushed. White are very resourceful when push comes to shove. Probably, the “world community” will demand retaliation against the Whites, but that could cause more problems for those wanting to retaliate, because White are very resourceful when push comes to shove.
Originally Posted by nelson
Quite a few years ago, the late Eric Sevareid was interviewed by Brian Lamb on C-SPAN.
Sevareid was asked his opinion of the younger generation of journalists, and he stated that it was impossible not to notice their comparatively poor command of English--for example, instead of "affluent elites," they often said, "effluent elites." Making a wry face which I'll never forget, Sevareid said "effluent...is sewage."
Nowadays I wonder if the younger journalists might have chosed the right word, after all!
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
Ah yes, the "great" tele-journalists Sevareid, Harry Reasoner, Edwin Newman, and others who have all addressed the poor state of the vulgar tongue!
They have nothing to say and they want to make sure we don't either, and one way to enhance this process is to make sure that all involved say nothing with ever clearer precision. I remember in particular a jew egghead named Richard Heffner from Jutgers Juniversity in Jew Jewrsey who hosts (or hosted) a Saturday AM talk show entited "The Open Mind." Significantly, its logo was a sort of flat Alexander Calder effigy of a human head, with a big hole in the brain area.
Mr. Heffner would start each program (probably still does) with a lofty, elegant and totally indecipherable speech to introduce his guest for the day. Many of the top gargoyles of our day guested -- Eely Weasel, Elliot Abrams, and a truly scary witch named Lawrence Cremin. The topic was always -- what was it? It was usually pretty hard to tell! [img]smileys/smiley11.gif[/img]
Edited by: nelson
<DIV>Whites to Be Minority in New York Area Soon, Data Show
By SAM ROBERTS
The influx of foreigners and the continuing exodus of
non-Hispanic whites are also transforming the suburbs, not
just the city.
Notice how the minority always seem to follow the money so White areas get flooded with non-whites forcing Whites to move and build in new areas, but when the areas the non-whites moved into are destroyed they start moving into the new areas that Whites built when they were forced out of their old areas and so the Whites have to build in yet another area. The tactic that we are seeing is a takeover, loot an area and move on when the area is destroyed. How long can this go on before the resources of the Whites run out and they are forced to make a stand?
Michael: "Notice how the minority always seem to follow the money....."
Ihave noticed that. Dee Cee and most any of the $tate capital$ have a large non-white populations. They know where to find the handout$. $$$$$
Er, I mean, they know how to follow the money.
Where's their (non-whites) pioneering spirit? All they want to do is lay around in some stinkin' city. I keep thinking of all the opportunieis they are missing in Africa and Mexico.
Right. The non-whites move in causing white-flight meaning new housing loans. At the same time the non-white immigrant or otherwise are sold the old neighborhood homes at long term low interest. More immigrants, more white-flight,more bank loans. Now who benefits from this constant cycle? Bankers,politicians,etc. How long will it take for total disenfranchisement of whites with this tactic, especially when they eventually reach the point they can never pay out? Most Americans will never actually own their homes because of the long-term 30 yr. contracts that they'll never live to finish.Originally Posted by Michael
THE pictures for immediate deployment to Congresscritters:
"Now, now, GOP," says the New York Times, don't vote for 'immigration' controls, or you'll risk losing thatforgettable margin of hispanic votes you've sold your soul for for the past 10 years!"
G.O.P. Risking Hispanic Votes on Immigration </NYT_LINE><NYT_BYLINE version="1.0" =" ">
<DIV =byline>WASHINGTON, March 29 — The battle among Republicans over immigration policy and border security is threatening to undercut a decade-long effort by President Bush and his party to court Hispanic voters, just as both parties are gearing up for the 2006 elections.</DIV>
"I believe the Republican Party has hurt itself already," said the Rev. Luis Cortes, a Philadelphia pastor close to President Bush and the leader of a national organization of Hispanic Protestant clergy members, saying he delivered that message to the president last week in a meeting at the White House.
</DIV>Edited by: nelson
A member of congress has called for prisoners to “pick the fruits”.
Non-whites would complaint about their being too many of them being forced to work and a lot of whips would be worn-out keeping them working. Maybe it would be best to separate the races and than we could use the liberals who clearly in the natural order would be members of the labor caste since clearly they lack intelligence and wisdom and common sense to govern anything. [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]
Many years ago our own people picked the fruits and other crops but because they were White they were in time denied the jobs so they had to find employment elsewhere. Blatant discrimination against Whites forced them from the jobs not their unwillingness to do the jobs.
Far back in our history we brought non-whites to do jobs that Whites weren’t suppose to be willing or able to do and those non-whites are still among us and causing all sorts of problems. Look back at many of the arguments for black slavery and you will find that they are the same ones used for bring in non-whites today.
The argument that whites will no longer do "demeaning" jobs is one of the biggest lies used to justify the Mexican invasion. Who does these jobs in New England, the upper Midwest,the ruralNorthwest, Appalachia, and everywhere else where the minority and immigration population is negligible or even non-existent? White people do!
If we ever get our country back, that is lesson number one -- if a people want a nation, they must do ALL the labor in it, and all people who work must be treated with the dignity they deserve.
Editor, The Nationalist Times, Voice of the Real America since 1985
An article about Americans doing the jobs that they aren’t suppose to do in past when wages went up and that the ones who say that Americans won’t do them want cheap labor. Also, a mention of how the American taxpayers supplement the illegal aliens income with welfare, so that businesses can hire them for less. http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/060401_deception.htm
An interesting question that comes up is would these illegal and even many of the legal non-whites come here if it wasn’t for welfare? Is welfare needed so that the Rich can have cheap labor? In other words, could welfare be a transfer of wealth from the middle class to the rich by allowing the upper class to have cheaper labor than they have otherwise.
Tom Lehrer penned a lyric in the early 1960s, part of a song lampooning self-serving American politicians:
"Even in Egypt, the Pharaohs
Used to import Hebrew 'Braseros'"
He was referring to the "Brasero" plan of importing temporary workers from Mexico into the US of A. Anybody remember the details of the "Brasero" movement? I was a tot at the time, I read somewhere that the program worked [the Braseros came, worked, and departed] because the program was massively unpopular, and discontinued in short order. Americans in the late 1950s - early 1960s didn't want ANY Mexicans prowling around, temporary or otherwise
Wow, you've reeled in a fascinating one there! I see it was a "program" of importing 175,000 Mexicans here temporarily and ultimately trashed by both Mexico and America -- but in response to alleged "human rights abuses" by both govts. Eerily evocative of the bonus marchers,the braceros claim to have been denied "savings" taken from their pay in the 1940s and have still been suing recently over it.
I have no doubt these two Babylonish bodies, the Mexican and US govts, defrauded the workersas charged. And THIS -- the Permanent Regime headquartered in Babylon-on-the Potomac -- is the outfit millions of clueless youth are more than happy to lay down their lives for as cannon fodder! Surely to swindle is a science,but to convince the world you're doing them a favor by it is an art.
The Dominican Republic's immigration problem sounds eerily familiar. Note the shocking political incorrectness of the first sentence of this paragraph, and the tragic ironies that ensue:
The Dominican Republic has suffered from racial tension throughout its history, particularly that between mulattos against blacks. This phenomenon is also found in neighboring Haiti. In recent years, illegal immigration from Haiti has dramatically increased as the Dominican economy improves and the Haitian economy remains virtually moribund. Most Haitian immigrants work at low-paying, unskilled labor jobs, including construction work and household cleaning. The Dominican sentiment towards these immigrants is frequently negative, and at times in its history, including the period during and after Haiti merged the two nations (the 19th century and the reign of Rafael Leonidas Trujillo), there have been anti-Haitian pogroms, slaughtering 18,000 Haitians at the border . This also led to Dominican Republic paying Haiti $750,000 to avert war.  Many foreigners reside in the country for business, religious, and leisure reasons, and there are significant populations of Americans, Canadians, Germans, French, and Koreans in the country.
Whew, by an odd "coincidence" I've just opened the latest SHNV mailer and THIS "immigration" and "diversity" study was waiting at thetop of it -- thank you, Silas!!!
<DIV>Decision Time! </DIV>
<DIV>From: email@example.com </DIV>
<DIV>A brief historical background on Mexico may help all of us in North America better understand how Meso-America got the way it is. The historical record indicates that a tribe called Azteca/Mejica migrated SOUTH from possibly the SW USA region. Before that, they were the original Yankees if they crossed Berengia-- the land bridge from Asia. Well, they did have the "meddling" and "tinkering" dominant predator philosophy like the yankees. They migrated to an island on a lake where Mexico City is now. The Aztecs established an empire and if any empire in the Western Hemisphere could be compared to the NAZI Reich, it would be the Aztecs. They were ethnocentric, militaristic, imperialistic, dominating, committed genocide against "inferior" peoples, exacted tribute from their neighbors, and waged almost constant warfare to acquire (tlacotin) --slaves for their labor force and to sacrifice to their gods. The gory but utilitarian purpose for mass sacrifices of prisoners by the Aztecs was to cow the surrounding and internal populations and to reduce the populations of their enemies and competitors. The Aztecs had a much more gory way to control the populations of their enemies and competitors than the Arabs who had castration centers in Southern Europe so that eunuch slaves could not reproduce while serving as the labor force for the dominant imperialistic Islamic Empire in the pre-to Middle Ages era. The Aztecs really were THE dominant predator society in Middle America until the Spanish took over. The Aztecs were feared, hated and condemned by all their neighbors.
When the Spanish came in force in the 1500's to conquest Mejico, Mr. Cortes was viewed almost as a savior by many of the tribes surrounding the Aztec empire and he was able to make a sort of friendship with these tribes who became allied with Cortes to rid themselves of the odious and burdensome Aztec presence. I have noticed a disturbing development among some so-called historians to greatly downplay and minimize the slavery and aggression factors manifested by the Aztecs. This is another aspect of the politically correct revisionist movement. They must make the American South to be the sole villain in the West in terms of the slavery issue-- NO ONE else can appear as "evil" as the rabid slaver--- The Southerner. The PC "historians" are outdoing themselves to make the South to appear as the great evil empire of the West. They are not only whitewashing US History but the history of other nations as well to make history FIT their agenda.
The Spanish began the importation of Africans as the new labor force in
Mexico and other parts of the newly expanded Spanish Empire. St. Augustine (the oldest European settlement/town/city in North America) was built by: "gangs of Blacks erecting palm log and sand breastworks" under Admiral Pedro Menendes de Aviles who was establishing a fort there to attack the French Huguenots at Fort St. Caroline (near Jacksonville, FL) who had "trespassed" on the Spanish land claim of Florida. The oldest town in America was built by African slaves owned by the Spanish. One of my French Huguenot ancestors was at Fort St. Caroline when the Spanish attacked that site and he miraculously survived the massacre.
The mixture of Spanish conquistador greed and the aggressiveness of the
Aztecs created a unique national social characteristic. Now, there is a
reverse migration northward of the descendants of the original Aztecs. It
is no secret that many Mexicans feel that the USA stole parts of the former Mexican colony or nation. There is a popular phrase among many Chicanos or Hispanics-- "RECONQUISTA" or in essence the re-conquest of these former possessions--i.e. Texas, Florida, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, California, etc.
The Spanish colony of Mexico gained independence in the 1820's and then the French intervention in the 1860's, then the Revolution 1910--1920 and the rest is history. Personally, I feel that somewhere along the way, someone made a poor choice of including on the Mexican national flag--the cultural and empirical Aztec symbol (the eagle perched on a cactus eating a snake) which fully represents the Aztec Empire and ALL that it stood for including slavery, imperialistic warfare, and pagan human sacrifice. Among many Chicanos and Mexicans-- there is a very strong cultural identity with the Aztecs evidenced by the display of artwork depicting Aztec leaders, symbols, ideas, and the identity even includes cuisine. When we eat: tacos, tamales, chocolate, mole, atoles, salsa, pozoles, enchiladas, and many fruit dishes, we are eating a-la-Aztec. Maybe the food isn't bad but the continuance of certain symbols can be bad in terms of what and who the symbols really represent. There is a gulf of a difference between what and who the Confederate flag represents and what and who the Aztec symbol on the Mexican flag represents. I do not desire to create any conflict here but I am pointing out a detail of what the public should know.</DIV>
<DIV>What of the innocuous, seemingly harmless eagle perched on a cactus eating
a snake symbol? Knowing what and who it stands for---I could never render honor, loyalty or service to THAT Aztec symbol. YOU should never render honor, loyalty or service to THAT Aztec symbol. Mexico should start a socio-economic reform movement by removing THAT Aztec symbol from their national colors. Then, the Mexican people should publicly try and hang the corrupt officials and organized crime members who are PUSHING millions of their countrymen OUT of Mexico. Only then can the USA and Mexico have equal relations. Meanwhile----Sad yet true---Like the famous literary poem says: "Good fences make good neighbors."</DIV>
<DIV>Southern Heritage News & Views
Keeping You Informed
SOUTHERN EVENTS CALENDAR
Post your Southern events, fundraisers,
meetings, etc. FREE
Southern Heritage News & Views Hot Spot
Check here often for breaking news between newsletters.
SHNV ARCHIVES (Now searchable)
Link Partners of SHNV
</DIV>Edited by: nelson
Thanks for the response and the history lesson. Too bad the Spanish didn't bring their own women with them when theyexplored and conquered. America would be immensely more European today
Silas Griffin writes good stuff. Wish he were Secretary of State
Is Chris Simcox' name now nationally known? Hurrah!
Simcox ultimatum to Bush: `Build fence or Minutemen will'
TUCSON, Ariz. Minuteman border watch leader Chris Simcox has a message for President Bush -- build new security fencing along the border or private citizens will.
Simcox says he's also sending an ultimatum to the president to deploy military reserves and the National Guard to the Arizona border by May 25th, or Minuteman volunteers and supporters will break ground and start erecting fencing privately.
The Minuteman leader says a half-dozen landowners along the Arizona-Mexico border say they'll allow fencing to be placed on their borderlands.
Simcox says the border barrier-and-fencing complex would include a six-foot deep trench so a vehicle can't crash through.
Other features may include coiled, razor-edged barbed wire, in front of a 15-foot high heavy-gauge steel mesh fence angled outward at the top.
Originally Posted by nelson
I wouldn't say he is nationally known, but he is getting there. Minutemen co-founder Jim Gilchrist did very well in a GOP primary last year in a California district against a pro-immigration Republican establishment type. Simcox and Gilchrist are among the very best examples of men of action in this era when most patriotic types are content to be "Internet warriors" and little else.
Editor, The Nationalist Times, Voice of the Real America since 1985
I heard that Hillary Clinton is now arguing for a wall and high-tech fence to be put up on the border. Even ole Howard Dean said he would be out on the border himself if he could, to keep the illegals out. Anything for political advantage. Well, at least they are smart enough to see the GOP isn't capitalizing on the fact that over 70% of Americans support a border wall.