A piece entitled "An Irish-Texan Reader Says Illegal Irish Should Blame Ted Kennedy"
Anyway, prior to the 1965 Immigration Act, the Irish quota always went unfilled, one of the reasons cited for changing the law.
Today’s carping illegal Irish would have had no problem getting in under the immigration guidelines that the 1965 act changed.
Ahern can thank their fellow Sen. Ted Kennedy (and others like him) for giving preference to the Third World immigrants over Europeans like the Irish.
http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_050208.htm
An article entitled "Canadian Invasion vs Mexican Invasion"
Canada has socialized medicine, which means overuse of non-essential services, and rationing of essential ones. As a result, at least a hundred women with high-risk pregnancies have had to come south of the Canadian border to get emergency free-enterprise medicine.
Of course, the babies naturally get dual Canadian-American citizenship as result of the circumstances of their birth, (and the current misinterpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause) but they go right home with their mothers, assuming, God willing, that both mother and child survive the high-risk birth.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/...dian-invasion- vs-mexican-invasion/
An piece entitled "A New York Reader Wonders Why The Fuss About Russian Women When Democrats Allow Mexicans To Pour Over The Border"
I don’t understand all the fuss about a few thousand Russians bilking the American system with the hope of getting U.S. citizenship.
The Democrats make the Russians look like pikers when it comes to citizenship schemes.
The party in power allows Mexicans to cross the border illegally, get free health care, housing, food and education. All the illegal aliens have to do then is wait for the Democrats to make them citizens in the next amnesty.
I’m not worried about 20,000 Russians that scam us. But I am scared about the 20 million or so Mexicans who will repay the Democrats with their votes well into the future.
http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_081709.htm
This is a phenomenon that appears to be based on people opposing immigration wanting to claim that their views aren’t based on race. In the end, the approach becomes ridiculous because these people attack Whites, who aren’t undermining society while ignoring the nonwhites’ mass invasion that is destroying society.
Sure the so-called "Russian" Mafia that should be called the Jewish Mafia does run many scams and even uses enslaves real White women in these scam that needs to be dealt with but is another issue. The whole issue of immigration comes down to one thing White/nonwhite. In the USA, it appears generally to be White Canadians, Irish and Eastern Europeans that are attacked by immigration opponents to avoid attacking nonwhites. In the UK, the Poles are the most common victims. These attacks on White immigrates are a diversion that allows the government to crack down on Whites while allowing the nonwhite invasion to continued. While a few White criminals maybe include in the White immigrates they pale in numbers to the criminals in the nonwhite invasion force. If a hundred million real Russians or any other group of real Whites were to replace the approximate hundred million nonwhites in the USA, we most likely enter a new golden age! Though, White immigrates may have a few minor problems in a new White country, past experience tells us that those problems are short lived and minor unlike nonwhites who causes major disruption for as long as they are in the White land!
A piece entitled "A Houston Reader Agrees That The U.S. Immigration Problem Is With Mexicans, Not Russians"
Amen to letter writer Dawn Carricio’s message that America should focus its concerns on our border and not with the comparatively small number of Russian scam artists.
When Russians in America have children, they will become Americans. But as it is said, "Wherever there is a Mexican, there is Mexico".
Mexicans rarely become Americans.
http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_082009.htm
An article entitled "Blonde Fruit Pickers In Great Britain"
I was fascinated by the picture they used. Not I, I hasten to add, because I am in any way fascinated by pictures of healthy young blonde women doing outdoor exercise. There is nothing politically interesting in a picture, of say, South Carolina’s Brooklyn Decker on the cover of Sports Illustrated. No, what I’m saying is that these young women–who don’t look anything like the people who picked the strawberries I ate for breakfast–are a relatively recent phenomenon in British immigration, (before 1989, they couldn’t even leave the Soviet Bloc)and not what most British critics of immigration are complaining about.
They are, however, fairly safe to complain about under Britain’s Race Relations Act.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/...de-fruit-picke rs-in-great-britain/
An article entitled "Politically Correct Racism (BBC Approved)"
Well! it seems that our politically correct friends at the BBC, and numerous other news and media organisations, have given us permission to hate the Poles, and to a slightly lesser extent, other immigrants from the various, previously Eastern block, European countries who gained access to the UK, and some other EU employment markets, in 2004 and 2007.
How else do you explain the fact that, in the last couple of years, whenever, there is a negative story about Immigration, such as the recent Lords report on the minimal benefit immigrants have brought to Britain, contrary to Government claims, we are immediately presented with images of white, Slavic, faces queuing up for work, Polish shops in the East End of London, or little white Lithuanian Children arriving at over stretched schools in Crewe or Exeter.
Strangely absent are the gangs of Asian, or black, men, not queuing for work, but just hanging around street corners, Asian shops and curry houses or any film from the growing number of schools where the faces of one or two white children peer out from amongst a sea of hijabs.
Of course, there is no mystery to this omission, the BBC is still the politically correct monolith it always was, and it, therefore, remains forbidden to focus on any of the negative effects of immigration from the non-European world. Immigrants from Africa, Arabia the Caribbean and Asia continue to be a protected and untouchable group, who, it must be regularly demonstrated have enriched and benefited our society.
Poles on the other hand are fair gameThe powers who like to control what the public think realised that the unprecedented levels of immigration had begun to alarm the public. However, they were certainly not about to let anyone suggest that arrivals from places such as Somalia, Nigeria, Jamaica, Algeria or Pakistan brought anything other than a welcome enrichment to our shores. Therefore, like the Ancient Roman emperors threw Christian to the lions in their arena, to keep the citizens entertained (and divert attention from their own excesses), the guardians of the multi coloured flame have thrown us a few white Polish plumbers and pale skinned Lithuanian builders to distract us from the realities of their multi racial project.http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.co...politically-co rrect-racism-bbc-approved.htmlHowever, unlike other groups of immigrants, who import their own unique problems to our country, the main problem with eastern Europeans is not what they bring, it is the manner in which cynical politicians and businessmen are exploiting them in order to exploit and control the home grown working classes. Because of cheap Eastern European immigration, there are many communities in this country forced to survive on a derisory minimum wage, unable to do anything about it because they know that, if they complain they will be swept away by a further tide of immigrants, happy to work for even less than they are earning.
However, the wrong doers in that respect are not the Eastern Europeans, it is with the politicians and cheapskate businessmen who, when they are not outsourcing to India, are using cheap European labour to keep wages down and profits up.
Be in no doubt that, in ten of fifteen years, when the current group of Eastern Europeans have decided that they deserve a living wage and a home they can afford without having to share with four other couples, the same people now telling us how lazy the English are and how desperately we need Eastern European immigrants, will be arguing in favour of increased immigration from Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, to do the jobs (at the wages) which the (lazy) Bulgarians will no longer do.
Using immigration in a cynical attempt to keep wages unnaturally low is certainly wrong, but the Eastern Europeans are the victims of that wrong, in the same way as they are the victims of the media's current efforts to make white Europeans take the blame for the problems caused by mass third world immigration.
An article entitled "Palm Beach minority groups want to stop guest workers. (because they are white)"
http://cofcc.org/2011/06/palm-beach-...roups-want-to- stop-guest-workers-because-they-are-white/Professional race hustlers like the NAACP and Latino groups are usually major advocates of open borders. However, after seeing an influx of white South Africans and Eastern European in Palm Beach, they are having a sudden change of heart. The staff of CofCC.org will now await for the local media to denounce the NAACP, The Urban League, and the Hispanic Human Resources Council as racists and xenophobes.
An article entitled "U.S. "Genius" visa attracts entrepreneurs and Playmates"
http://news.yahoo.com/u-genius-visa-...0--sector.html
Notice how most of the people mentioned in the article are most likely White. That seems to happen a lot when an article criticizes immigration even in the slightest way. Let's face it this Canadian women with a French last name http://lastnames.myheritage.com/last-name/Bechard is probably smarter than over 90% of the nonwhite invaders even those "smart" Asian Indians with Ph.D.'s often from Diploma mills, and she', probably, cause a lot less problems.
In "immigration", it is simply a difference between Whites immigrates and nonwhite invaders.
It so happens this disgusting article comes out in the wake of the fedgoons passing a law that your passport gets revoked if the IRS says you owe $50,000 in taxes -- yet another dictate with no hope of appeal. It's said they used the Holder controversy as cover.Since they knew the law was going to be unpopular with the many people now seeking asylum from Asylumerica.
This news just in, too:
http://news.liveandinvestoverseas.co...accountsq.html
It's pure, textbook communism. The communist manifesto mandates seizing the property of escapees from the workers' paradise.
Last edited by Nelson4; 07-02-2012 at 05:33 PM.
Of course, the Jews will have their Jewish state passport so they can leave no matter how much they owe. The law will primary affect White emigrants. It is ironic with how much the "elite" hates Whites that they need Whites in order to support their multicultural empire, but don't want White immigrants. All very confusing.Originally Posted by Nelson4
An article entitled "WSJ: Good News On Hispanics: Argentine Immigrants Assimilating! (Bad News: American-Born Mexicans Not So Much)"
http://www.vdare.com/posts/wsj-good-...orn-mexicans-n
Argentine population is mostly White so Whites assimilate and nonwhites don't!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote