It is undisputed that the formation of a race stems
from isolation. One could even describe race as a specific social
group for periods of generations. As a result, segregation is a
natural part of race. When races are mixed, genetically anyway,
in a new, specific area, a new race forms. This race will want to
be separate from other races. There needs to be no government
interference. If a group truely is a race, they will want to live
separately to some degree. Just live and let live.
Freedom in its true form is not the right to do whatever one wishes, but the right to have a will that triumphs and makes one successful.
Unfortunately, different subspecies (a.k.a. races) of mammals need to
be very far apart. Like on different continents or conflicts
occur between the races. Also, when one race sees that another
race has more than they do the race with less will try to take it from
the race with more and if they can’t do it by force they will want the
race with more to give them so the two are equal.
The warming Thomas Jefferson give us, “Nothing is more certainly
written in the book of fate, than that these people are to be free; nor
is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the
same government. Nature, habit, opinion have drawn indelible
lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to
direct the process of emancipation and deportation, peacefully...if, on
the contrary, it is left to force itself on, human nature must shudder
at the prospect...” We have reached the point where “human nature” is
shuddering.
The natural instincts of a race is to survive and though the current
White “leaders” may not be strong in that regard most people are still,
so if we let nature take it course disaster will follow as a struggle
for dominance erupts.
Here's the pay dirt thinking people have dreamed of for 40 years -- a major city in the beatific, equalitarian, ultra-tolerant far north is blithely saying yes to segregated schools. (While no less blithely denying that that's what they're doing, of course!)
They offer apologies to no one and act as if this were an isolated case that had nothing to say about liberal social engineering schemes of the latter 20th century. Will the commie do-gooders put a stop to it and save the Brown vs. Board of Education cultists the obvious embarrassment that will ensue if this catches on around the country?
How will they explain it to the poor darling minority children who are now to be denied the long sought privilege of schooling alongside wealthier white youth? Ah -- I see it -- they're already explaining it as a means to avoid "shortchanging" of nonwhite kids.
But what happens when the white schools outperform some othersagain as they always did before in everything from grades to crime rates? And what about those "East and American Indian children" who don't fit any of the newly hatched racial categories? Surely they deserve schools of their own, even if only for a handful of kids at a time. C'mon, "fairness" demands it!..............."Diversity is our greatest strength!" [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]
Presently linked at ANU.ORG.......thanks, Don! [img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]
<H2>Omaha schools to be split by race</H2>
By Scott Bauer
ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 14, 2006
LINCOLN, Neb. -- The Nebraska Legislature voted yesterday to divide the Omaha school system into three districts -- one mostly black, one predominantly white and one largely Hispanic -- in a move decried as state-enforced segregation.
Supporters, including the bill's sponsor and the legislature's only black senator, said the plan would give minorities control over their own school board and ensure that their children are not "shortchanged" in favor of white youngsters.
Gov. Dave Heineman, a Republican, signed the measure into law.
Sen. Pat Bourne of Omaha decried the bill, which passed 31-16.
"We will go down in history as one of the first states in 20 years to set race relations back," the Democrat said.
"History will not, and should not, judge us kindly," said Democratic Sen. Gwen Howard of Omaha.
Attorney General Jon Bruning sent a letter to one of the measure's opponents saying that the bill could be in violation of the Constitution's equal-protection clause and that lawsuits almost certainly will be filed...............
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060413-115910-4251r.htm
Edited by: nelson
Sounds like the black state senator is a truth black leader who cares about his people not one of the so-called black “leaders” who cares only about their pocketbooks and enslaves their people to the dogma of multiculturalism.
The neo-cons and liberals elites can not let the situation remain because the non-whites education might improve a little but the Whites would improve a lot. They can not afford to let the truth be seen.
It will be interesting to see what happens with this over the next few months. Maybe it will be the start of something good, at least for the areas in citiesit can still help. Some are too far gone. Anyway, its a good sign.
"People are just set in their ways"
Equal but Separate
Decades after Jim Crow, black patrons of the 4 Way Lunch counter in Cartersville, Ga., are still sitting in the back -- by choice.
CARTERSVILLE, Ga. — Marvin Mitchell and Henry Lee Smith forged a brotherly bond long before the civil rights era came to Georgia's Appalachian foothills. Smith taught Mitchell how to drive a car in the early 1950s. Mitchell's parents gave Smith a job and fed him at the family table.
But six mornings a week, the two old friends enter the 4 Way Lunch counter through different doors at breakfast time. Mitchell, who is white, goes to the main dining room up front. Smith, who is black, goes through a side entrance and sits in a cramped backroom where blacks were once forced to eat during the Jim Crow era.
These days, blacks are welcome to sit wherever they want at 4 Way Lunch. But Smith, like many older African Americans here, still shuns the front section.
So he and Mitchell are left to carry on half a century of ribbing and reminiscing through the narrow kitchen doorway. They shout their daily hellos over the country music. Stories are shuttled back and forth by an obliging wait staff.
"Pete," Mitchell says to co-owner Lillian "Pete" Starnes, "ask Henry what year he went to work for my daddy."
Starnes confers with Smith and yells, " '52."
"Pete," Mitchell says, "Go tell Henry I'm going to tell the story about the time I got him drunk"..................
http://ktla.trb.com/news/la-na-cafe2...798297.story?c oll=ktla-news-1
What think ye here, gang? Strangely enough, a featured Wiki news article today is about students in India staging picturesque protests against education quotas.
Am not sure what to think about this issue in and of itself. The caste system was originally racial; is it still? On an nrelated note I guess scenes like this prove that English really is the world's lingua franca today. In a "global society" rife with instant communication, no doubt it's the only way for a linguistic baskey case like India to keep moving.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_...vation_protest s%2C_2006
The caste system in India became race based with the Religious and Warrior caste being White and most likely the other being basically non-whites. As time went along many of the higher caste mixed with lower caste even though they were not suppose to in India because of the racial differences that they defined caste by. But there is evidence that the caste system originally was based on people’s abilities not their race or family but it was a White homogeneous group that the idea comes from so only one race was involved. It was also not inherited and people would and could be members of all Caste. Here is an article about the caste in ancient Ireland.
http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=3690
The White race appears to function with caste with people having different skills and abilities. In India they made caste race based it failed because Whites can have children with different abilities than they have. The “Highest” caste could have child of the “lowest” caste and vice versa. Though the probably is that parents will have children similar to their abilities they care genes of all caste so in time the descendants of people abilities alter. Also, people can do functions of more than one caste. Make a caste system to rigid and the worst will end up running everything into the ground. India try to use it for racial purity when they should have been separating and slowly they mixed until very few Whites remain in India today.
I have heard it reported that lower castes in India are given Affirmative action, and other special “rights”.
We hear these egalitarians complain that it is not fair that the races don’t have the same abilities and they try to wish it away because it is unfair but because it is not fair does not make it untrue. And in reality is it unfair? Was it unfair for the ancient Whites to have to live in harsh unforgiving lands when other races lived in virtual tropical paradises? Or was it merely the price that had to be paid for their descendants to reap the abilities that we have today? One group was given a paradise to live in; whereas, another was give a harsh unforgiving land but also the abilities to survive in and tame that land and turn it into a virtual paradise, but those who had lived in a virtual paradise for many years saw that the paradise that was created at the price of struggle and hardship was better than theirs so they screamed that they want the other paradise And the egalitarians believing it wasn’t fair want to share but the other races did not know how to maintain or live in the built paradise so they became parasites in paradise and started to destroy it. What neither the egalitarians nor the parasites understood is that the Western paradise is an inheritance that can not be given away for the civilization must be maintained by those of the blood who struggled and sacrificed for countless generations in order to create a paradise that the egalitarians and the parasites are trying to destroy in the name of fairness. What we see today is a very small piece of a much bigger picture. What seems unfair to some today may be very fair and justice if one looks at the whole picture and more importantly there may be more to the whole than we can comprehend!
Edited by: Michael
Michael - Bingo, You hit the nail right on the head.
The point has always been that blacks just can't contribute to a civilized society. That's why they're strangling themselves with all the rope they've been given. It's my view that slavery masked this idea. Nobody knew just how far behind the white race they were/are. So people naturally thought that they could be brought up to par by changing theircircumstances. Of course, we've found out that idea is nonsense.
Another point to this is the Asians/Orientals. I think the same is true of them. It takes more than intellect, which they seem to have in abundance. There's an intangible here that they don't possess. It may be a background in western civilization. We didn't just wake up one day and decide to have a republic. It was the culmination of hundreds/thousands of years on movement, social,moral and material that when all put together produced the "Idea" of America.
The thing is this, the idea that this country represents takes constant work to make it effective. That's where we're falling down these days. We're not producing the type of people who can make the ideaa reality. You can just stand in a mall and watch the people as they go about their business. Youcan see the shabby way they dress, their posture,the way they walk, their ridiculous babbling onphones, etc. The list is endless.
Thanks for anecellent post Michael.
John...
Article about moving poor (read nonwhites) into "Low-poverty" (read White) areas. Basically, one can move the nonwhites to White areas but the nonwhites still act like nonwhites.
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives...ow_much_does_a .php
An article entitled "Britons Leaving Cities as Third World Immigrants Move in"
A centuries old civilisation which has influenced the whole world with its advanced culture is being demolished by treachery from within. It is time that racial aliens were sent back to their homelands and a great nation allowed to revitalise itself, but that will not happen until the present government of Great Britain is removed from power and replaced by a government that actually represents the White people of Britain.
The U.K. is not like the U.S.A. We still have wide open spaces over here, and the wealthy liberals and retiring Baby Boomers can always create more gated communities, Boomertowns and ever more distant suburbs to which they can flee for safety. The price of real estate betrays the fact that White neighborhoods, especially in the suburbs go for a premium while black-infested real estate sometimes cannot even be given away. (Many White property owners in Detroit simply abandoned their properties which became too dangerous to visit.) Wealthy Whites in America enjoy a discreetly all-White environment in their suburbs, free of muggers, crack addicts and swarthy teenagers looking for trouble.
Britain however is a relatively small island, with barely enough room for its White population. They don’t have the luxury of vast open areas; they just keep trying to jam more and more sardines into the tin can, with the most recent being brown and rotten ones.
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/brit...g-cities-as-th ird-world-immigrants-move-in_1239.html
An article entitled "The Morality of Survival"
Because economic inequality between groups inevitably produces envy, stable societies are almost always homogeneous. Multi-ethnic and multicultural societies live on the edge of dissolution. In such cases, the role of government turns to conflict management, as Brent Nelson points out in "America Balkanized". "Government as conflict management is an emerging theme of public life in the U.S., a theme which recurrently manifests itself in the concepts of dialogue, mediation, sensitivity, tolerance, and balance. The latter terms are increasingly the shibboleths of American public life. The fiction is maintained that these concepts . . . will produce a final resolution of intergroup conflicts. . . . [T]he reality is something quite other." Laws against "hate crime" and "hate speech" reflect that other reality.
http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008...-morality-of-s urvival/
An article entitled "Self-segregation still the norm in 21st-century America"
http://www.davidduke.com/general/sel...ion-still-the- norm-in-21st-century-america_6803.html
An article entitled "Diversity wrecking havoc across the globe!"
Rival minority groups battle it out in Europe. Arabs attacking Jews in France, Belgium, Sweden and Denmark. The fruits of open borders.
Taiwanese Aborigines on verge of extinction. Riot against Taiwan government. Multiculturalism does not exist in the real world, only replacement.
http://cofcc.org/?p=2876
One can not defend their people, if they do not defend their race. Race and nation are inseparable. For peace to reign racial separation is imperative.
An article entitled "Study: Teachers Choose Schools According to Student Race"
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives...eachers_choose .php
An article entitled "Most whites prefer other whites over blacks declares Science Daily."
Is racial bias natural or some great sin? by Kyle Rogers
Science Daily published another article confirming results of implicit testing on racial bias. Most white people favor members of their own racial group.
http://cofcc.org/?p=5412
An article entitled "White Cyber-Segregation"
One clear example of this (aside from White people congregating in White neighborhoods for their safety), is the general White aversion to public transportation. Liberals have never had any real success with one of the major items on their leftist Agenda, forcing White people to give up their cars and ride public transportation. Public transit forces Whites into physical contact with non-Whites, which is one reason it’s on the Agenda and the main reason this particular Agenda item has never caught on.
The same pattern is now manifesting itself in cyber-space. There are millions of young White people out there who would be receptive to our message, if we could just reach them and let them know where we are. We could at least give them something better to do with their time on the Internet than Facebook. Feel free to spread the word about this website. There’s a receptive audience out there. Just stay off MySpace; it’s a jungle.
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=2325
Article: Scalia: Some on court inventing rights - East Valley Tribune
"...Scalia said he likely would have dissented from the historic 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision that declared school segregation illegal and struck down the system of "separate but equal'' public schools. He said that decision, which overturned earlier precedent, was designed to provide an approach the majority liked better."
Last edited by gardenstate; 11-20-2011 at 07:17 PM.
Hat's off to Justice Scalia! [img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]</span> I'm glad to see he had the stones to admit that.Originally Posted by GardenState
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote