From the morning's e-junkmail:
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Media Contact: Leslie Levine, 847-205-9853; Dean Draznin, 641-472-2257; Anu Palan (Women Thrive), 240-565-4078</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"></div>
FOURTEEN WOMEN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FAST AGAINST BUDGET CUTS TO POVERTY AND HUNGER PROGRAMS THIS WEEK
<div style="font-family: Courier New,Courier,mono;" align="LEFT">Well may they fast -- because of these "programs", everybody's going to be out of food soon. </font></div>
</font><div align="LEFT">Hope they'll watch a lot of Ron Paul videos during their confinement.</span><br style="font-family: Courier New,Courier,mono;"><br style="font-family: Courier New,Courier,mono;">/\/.\/\/.</span>
My article in the November issue of the First Freedom seems to be well-received. I regrettably don't have time to read / funds to order / space to store even the best rightist periodicals -- so I don't know TFF mentioned the the piece was originally my editorial in vol. 1 #5 of the Real News, the South Carolina Conservative Action Council's occasional print paper. Anybody reading this wants a sample copy, just let me know -- not in competition with TNT, merely a somewhat similarly-minded publication/org.
The piece was a followup to my previous editorial. Here they both are, together and uncut for the first time. Cleaned up a bit too. In 23 parts because (whoops) there seem to be space limits now.
Dear Governor Haley
Our sincere congratulations to you on being elected. As a young legislator you came across as more approachable and down-to-earth than many politicians. We, the people who are concerned about government integrity and citizen liberty here in the South, were impressed and dared hope those qualities of yours would never change. We trust you were fully with us then and will only grow more so in the years that follow your remarkable victory.
Your election has been greeted with a tumult of acclaim from the Northern-owned mass media and other directions. You came in for some criticism for not being totally in accord with the media's special agenda, but Newsweek's treatment of your saga is alone enough to show that they love you on the whole.
Have you ever stopped to contemplate specifically why they do, though? Perhaps it’s not for what you can do for South Carolina but for how you can be of use to their schemes for the world under the strategic trigger-words of "tolerance" and "diversity."
We have to ask you this, because you appear to share some of the establishment’s sentiments. Tolerance is a wonderful thing – until it means total destabilization of a society, or a people brainwashed into mindless passivity. We, the people have concluded that those are the real goals of the dominant leftwing media and many other forces governing our society.
Healthy diversity is desirable as well. The tragedy here is that having saturated all the institutions, the establishment’s notion of "diversity" is now revealed as a comprehensive program for the replacement of America’s traditional ethnic makeup with belligerent masses from the developing world. If you have already bought into the mantra that America is a “propositional nation” in which race doesn’t matter, we fear you are ill equipped for political office.
We, the people, can see quite clearly the goals of the self-appointed “elite”. But please make no mistake -- we are neither stupid or evil for decrying them as is often claimed. Surely no one can deny that the dominant media (with their massive influence on politics, education, economics, ad infinitum) are in fact radically left-wing, or "liberal" in the misguided jargon prevalent today. The mass media claim to be impartial, but sources like the famed Lichter-Rothman report and numerous blithe admissions by media leaders prove otherwise – and this orientation of theirs is the real essence of the war against Southern heritage from its needless and avoidable beginnings in the nineteenth century to today.
We fear from portions of your inaugural address that you are either consciously or otherwise in sympathy with this Northern-based leftwing agenda. You emphasized your family's immigrant status, your mother's gains for women in India, the discrimination she faced there and so forth. This is the trend of the times as imposed by planners in places like New York and Los Angeles, but India is of course a different country from the United States. Have you noticed? Feminism and the "nation of immigrants" mythos are not the first things on the mind on most rank-and-file Southerners when they wake up each morning.
Frankly, we are wondering why you opted to play to the left’s agenda at all. We, the people have generally always wanted one kind of future for ourselves, but the rich and powerful have (for most of the past century at least) fought viciously to bring about the exact opposite. They want a socialist melting-pot welfare-warfare state; left to our own devices, we the people want a peace-loving meritocracy and, despite being among the most truly tolerant societies on earth, we Southerners feel no need to accept the importation of millions of foreigners among us. Most of us happen to be Christians, certainly most of the middle class that has been the backbone of the nation since colonial times.
Yes – we cleave without apology to the classically Southern traditions, ethics, heroes, morals, dreams and culture that made us what we are today. And surely you can understand that we are very tired of being told that everything about us is wrong and only fit for “change”. It is a simple fact that our critics are in no position to point the finger, which we will be happy to fully document for you anytime.
No, of course we don't expect to live in a monoracial or totally monocultural society, but wouldn't you agree what we're getting is total chaos and destabilization? You have thankfully come out for immigration sanity, though we'd like to point out that the answer there is even simpler and friendlier than what you have advocated: bring back the pre-1965 laws that worked. Fund them and enforce them.
We have been gratified by your statements to the effect that you will take no initiative to change the status of the Confederate Flag at the Soldiers Monument on the north side of the State House, but some aspects of these statements also give us grave concern.
We the defenders of Dixie request a post-election meeting with you in person. It concerns us that while rightly naysaying the need for revisiting the Flag issue, it sounds as if you do so as a purely pragmatic matter. A Youtube video in which you are interviewed by several from among our ranks is disconcerting: your understanding of the War Between the States and its real legacy appears ready for an update.
Our only desire is to stop having the ground yanked out from under us in the name of love and brotherhood.
Please let us hear from you soon.
Associate Editor, The Real News
Contributing writer, The Nationalist Times
Former editor, The Patriot Cannon
Former Secretary, S.C. Council of Conservative Citizens
Governor Haley comes through
The Confederate flag at the SC state house is in the news again. Anti-Southern hate will undoubtedly never die as long as leftists are still wandering around out of their cages.
It was just another day in the struggle for Southern civilization. The cancer was showing signs of coming back -- the NAACP was baying at the C-flag again, the leftwing mass media assuring them of the microphone as always.
This time the National Association of Always Complaining People had a new gimmick: South Carolina has its first minority governor! By "liberal" logic, the media-government complex tags all nonwhites as victims of white oppression, so Ms Haley should be delighted to jump on the psy-ops bandwagon with the NAACP -- right?
Ms Haley stood at the crossroads every S.C. governor does, thanks to the leftwing media's sick orchestration of issues and subjects. Would she too throw her state over for the radical fringe as all recent governors before Mark Sanford did, or merely offer another neutral clichť -- or would she take the crucial common-sense position on the flag shunned by most public figures?
Quietly but stunningly, Gov. Haley actually chose the latter course. Governor, we commend and thank you.
God has the greatest sense of humor, and it shows in the names people end up with. The most jealous hate group in the USA, the NAACP, is headed by one Benjamin Jealous.
On July 25, Ben-Jel gave a speech in California, the state most ruined by the policies he advocates, squawking "Perhaps one of the most perplexing examples of the contradictions of this moment in history is that Nikki Haley, South Carolina's first governor of color, continues to fly the Confederate flag in front of her state's capitol.
"Given the similarities between our struggles to end slavery and segregation, and her ancestors' struggle to end British colonialism and oppression in India, my question to Governor Haley is one that Dr. ["Martin Luther"] King often asked himself: 'What would Gandhi do?''
The last bit is especially pathetic; Ben-Jel of all people should know Mahatma Gandhi has lately been revealed as a "racist" just like everybody else who reached adulthood before the TV age (including MLK). Should we tell Jel that the Governor doesn‘t actually do any flying of flags in front of “her“ capitol?
Thank God, this bleating was all for naught: The Governor had made at least one waffling statement on the Flag before, but this time her office pretty much closed the book:
“More than a decade ago, under the leadership of a Democratic governor, South Carolinians Republican and Democrat, black and white, came to a compromise position on the Confederate flag,” Haley’s spokesman Rob Godfrey told FOX News. “Many people were uncomfortable with that compromise, but it addressed a sensitive subject in a way South Carolina as a whole could accept. We don’t expect people from outside of the state to understand that dynamic, but revisiting that issue is not part of the governor’s agenda” (fitsnews.com, emphasis added).
This is a true "man bites dog" headline. Are we really going to do what's obviously needed from now on and quit living by whatever whims dominate the media-addled minds of the teeming masses?
God knows we should. But unless I'm mistaken, this is the first time any SC governor has made a public, positive statement that he or she has no intention of revisiting the so-called compromise. I have no recollection of even Mark Sanford mentioning the subject. What has changed?
It appears the politicians and press have finally had to face the fact that we, the people, aren't going to drop this ball as we have so many others. And I suspect what has swung the pendulum as much as any other single factor is your, my and Dr. Carter‘s hard work on the case.
In the wake of the crossfire between the Governor and the agitator, articles from "mainstream" publications are making noises to the effect that the so-called compromise might as well remain standing. This is not in the socialist script -- and I can think of no other ultimate reason for it than the SCCAC's determination in keeping truth alive and the skeer on its enemies, always in the name of South Carolinians’ real needs and wants.
If a juggernaut of hate (e.g. the NAACP and the Soviet-ameriKan mass media) pushes in one direction for 20 years, crushing people and social standards without letup, nothing stops it except something of equal weight in the opposite direction. The SCCAC doesn't have the NAACP's fabulous budget or influence, but the truth has ultimate power. All that's needed is a remnant who love it and are willing to put in the time, money and elbow grease for it..... three things that the SCCAC always urgently needs more donations of, by the way.
A SC governor has finally stated outright that her agenda doesn't include pampering the NAACP. If y'all out there have other explanations for this than the above, say on. We'll be the first to applaud anybody else actively working to keep the South in South Carolina, but I fear it's safe to say that a decade after the so-called compromise, we're the only ones doing any actual systematic, sustained fighting.
We don't want to be. And I'm not in search of any personal credit, but could it be significant that Gov. Haley's last comment on the flag issue was a weak "There's not enough support for moving it to bring a healthy debate", after which over 10,000 copies of the last Real News issue were distributed, and now this development? That paper was sent to all SC legislators. My editorial was an open letter to the Governor, summing up the flag case and urging an end to and NAACPocracy.
Whatever the back-story (if any) may be, THANK YOU AGAIN for this short and simple pronouncement re the Flag, Governor Haley! Strom Thurmond didn't have your common sense in the matter. Neither did Carroll Campbell, or Jim Hodges. David Beasley sure didn't, and as a direct result he will never work in SC politics again.
All politicians are invited to remember as well that we the people will not be satisfied until the entire so-called flag compromise is overturned. We know our rights, and we dare claim them.
Asian "Indian" is like "Hispanic" can range from White too very dark. Ms. Haley would, probably, in India have been discriminated against for being Aryan. They have massive Affirmative Action in Indian that discriminates against the Whiter "Indians."
Think of that! In other words, even in India, a darker country famous (or infamous) for the caste system and the "Aryan" race, is now burning up with "reverse" racism no less than Detroit, London or Paris?
They must have a lot of gews there.
That's even more staggering. They can't be wielding that much direct power, so India must be manifesting the imprint or funhouse mirror image of diversitarianism elsewhere. Nothing would surprise me. "Anti-racism" is the political Beatlemania of the last 30 years.
Just posted here -- let's see if it passes the censors:
Excuse me, mysterious invisible people who run this site, what are you doing with the word "conservative" in your name? What, exactly, is conservative about you, when you'll abandon the issues that matter and jump in bed with liberal commies and smear the only recognizable human being in the race with this "newsletter" CRAP?
You think the neocon demigods aren't racists? Check their records of courting minority votes and blocs, leaving the white race out to dry. How about the Republican establishment's support for every kind of "reverse" racism on earth -- open borders, "affirmative action", "voting rights act", Martin Lucifer King Holiday, ad nauseam.
You provide good, valuable news links plus a bunch of total neocon CRAP. Is that your real objective -- to lure people with candy and get them to wash it down with some neocon CRAP before they know what's happening? Does your site-name really have to do with destroying true conservatism one "byte" at a time?
You see what a spectacular failure your efforts are today -- most comments predictably favor Dr. Paul and nothing you can do about it. Care to dig yourselves in any deeper? If this country goes down with one of your neocon warmonger presidents in charge because your kind has succeeded in hoodwinking the sheeple that far, YOU will have to answer for the final downfall of the greatest nation this world has ever seen.
WE WANT RON PAUL -- OR NO PRESIDENT AT ALL!
Stop confusing them with common sense and truth, it makes their brains hurt.
Editor, The Nationalist Times, Voice of the Real America since 1985
I exist to get the terminally anesthetized feeling something again.
I was being purely ironic and strategic re "greatest nation" -- throwing what THEY think back in their smug little faces.
One has heard countless times a lazy dittohead rebuttal on cable tv and talk radio to charges of "racism" pleading, "I'm not a racist I agree with MLK's vision of America that we all be treated equal. If King was alive today he'd be a conservative...you know his daddy was a Republican."
"his daddy was a Republican" -- oh criminy, that's lame! And useful.
Mr. Kink has become an idol that everybody who would be anybody must acknowledge in order not to be branded "racist". The name is rarely spoken without "Dr." and "Jr." attached, often with a nervous or fidgety tone, as if to betray the speaker's unhappiness in affirming such frauds.
Speaking of tones, anybody but me ever notice how homogeneous Rush's dittoheads are? Most of them speak in a high, hebephrenic range when finally getting to address their god directly. There's no manhood there.
Brannon Howse's Worldview Weekend is to one of the better fundy Christian activist organizations. I didn't condemn them wholesale below because they do a lot of good work when not perpetuating JEWISH FABLES (Titus 1:14). How can such intelligence coexist in the same brains with such militant ignorance? Course, that's true of all of us to some extent, but not all of use work so hard to keep JEWISH FABLES rampaging the countryside.
The emailed speech is by a young German, Furchert, whose tired and tawdry subject is how easily Hitler beguiled Germany with pseudo-evangelistic jivetalk and how it's happening here today. "The most evil man in history," etc. etc., "I'm ashamed of what my country did back then," blah blah. PLEASE.
Your name: Nelson Waller
Subject: "Two Radio Programs You Will Want to Listen to Immediately", just received by email
OK, OK, that's enough whining by Christians about Nazism. It's always totally yanked out of the context of the times. I'm not necessarily defending Hitler, merely calling for an end to this ever warped, rootless, brainless ranting on a subject on which most Americans are totally ignorant even lots of well-meaning Germans have no depth of understanding. Besides, even if Nazi Germany had killed the mythic figure of 6 million Jews, how about the 60 million Christians slaughtered and starved to death by Jewish communists? Forget the so-called "Holocaust" and other JEWISH FABLES and try looking up HOLODOMOR, please -- just for instance. YOU'RE NEXT into the Gulag, bright-eyed bushy-tailed white fundy Christian activists, if you don't get real on these subjects pronto!
Dave comes through!!
NOT ALL ISRAEL, IS ISRAEL
Coach Daubenmire, mentioned in this and 5 other threads here, fought it off as long as he could, but in the end FREEDOM is too habit-forming. He's halting, faltering, anxious, trepidatious in this his jewth debut but goes the distance! This is a big little day in anti-Zion -- how many times was the Coach a guest on Dr.-Goody Two-Shoes Dobson's radio show, a benchmark of fundy PC propriety?
Congratulations on going the distance with the truth, Dave -- may God richly bless you!!!!
I trust you're prepared for anything, including the loss of some or most of your present world of friends, co-laborers, maybe even family... I doubt it will be that bad in your case, but one never knows till he knows.
Welcome to the real world, my courageous brother in Christ. Encore!
Last edited by Nelson4; 03-25-2013 at 06:09 AM.
Most people don't know about the Holodomor. If you tell them, "Don't take my word for it, go look it up online"...and they are shocked what they find out. People had Anne Frank drummed into them in school, but they never learned about the forced Ukrainian famine. Nor do they learn how many Germans died in WWII. Which is why wars are foolish, because you're just fighting for someone else's cause.
Always. Haven't come across a war yet that wasn't totally unnecessary. Even the War Between the States could have been avoided if cooler heads had prevailed on both sides -- according to R.E. Lee.
Could you imagine what life would be like if young Americans grew up being taught that fighting in a war is one of the most degrading, toxic misadventures possible? Heck, their parents don't even teach them that -- they have no clue of it themselves!
As the saying goes "The best bleed and the worst breed." The Christmas Eve truce during World War I could have ushered in an era of peace between the White nations, but the "leaders" moved to continue the war. Later the Allies and Central Powers were close to peace when the Jews promise the British victory if they gave them Palestine. Wilson who could have been a true peacemaker allowed the Jews to blackmail him so that hundreds of millions so far have died because of his actions on behalf of the Jews.
Wars with nonwhites are, probably, inevitable because they do not think like us, so race wars can't be avoid, but if we had left them alone and not given them our technology, they would still be fighting with medieval weapons or even stone age weapons.
War removes the best Whites from the gene pool and leaves the worst behind. After many generation society falls to pieces to the point of collapse and a dark ages follows where the gene pool is purified and a new civilization is born. Ironically, as the worst become more numerous wars increase as they rise to power and send the best to die.
The Jews and many other nonwhites will not allow White nations to live in peace until the Jews and other nonwhites are utterly defeated.