People there are 2 of: PJB Beck Coulter..

[Nelson3]

Step right up, folks, and see the display of double people!</span> Yes, ladies and gentlemen, some human beings are actually double -- they exist in both Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde forms. Step this way please, admission is only three simoleons!

I'm reading the SPLC's often hilarious Un</span>telligence Report again. It has quite</span> a tribute to the good half of Ann Coulter![img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]

I know you all will enjoy every morsel of it. This too is great news but I felt it called for a new page entirely rather than inclusion in any of our many Good News threads.





Hate in the Mainstream</span></font>
</font>

Ann Coulter Defends White Supremacist Group</span>
</font> http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intel...icle.jsp?aid=1 048

Other startling wares are on display in the SPLC hate and lie mall:
<br style="font-weight: bold;"></font></span>



'National Anarchism'</span><br style="font-weight: bold;">California Racists Claim They're Anarchists</span></font></font>

<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"> http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intel...icle.jsp?aid=1 058

</span>
Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

The other Pat Buchanan strikes again -- nauseatingly.




<div style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
Cheney Shows the Way
</font></font></div>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32004


Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

The good Glenny Becky is back!!! YOU WON'T BELIEVE THIS -- SPREAD IT FAR AND WIDE. The fedgoons use the clunkers for cash "program" brazenly to heist everything off your hard drive.

The email, then the web version: </font>


<t></t><table width="100%"><t><tr><td align="right"><label>Subject:</label>
</td>
<td valign="top">

Brasscheck TV: Hard to believe, but true

</td>
</tr>


<tr>
<td align="right">
<label>Size:</label>
</td>
<td valign="top">
2 KB
</td>
</tr>




</t></table>







Nelson

Just when you think the federal government of the US
could not become more insanely dysfunctional...

Well, take a look for yourself:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/682.html

- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks. </pre>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;

Data grab insanity</font>
<br style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><t></t><table style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><t><tr><td>Home</td><td></td><td>More videos like this</td></tr>
</t></table>





"We're from the government
and we're here to help"
</font>





I hate to give Fox News faker Glenn Beck any credit - especially since
he mimics and plagiarizes Alex Jones word for word, phrase for phrase -
but even a broken clock is right twice a day.



Here's some simple life advice from Brasscheck:



The less you have to do with the government, in all its aspects, the happier you will be.
</font>


Edited by: Nelson3

[gardenstate]

Buchanan's latest article at Human Events, Populist Right Rising, chronicles the past "uprisings" by Middle America over the last fifty years, and sees the same thing occuring today. He rightly points out that the media and political (both in the GOP and Democratic parties) elites failed to fully understandthe discontentfelt by the American populace in 1972, 1992, 1994 and 2008. Though in the past Buchanan has said that the two major partiesare "two wings of the same bird of prey", hecontinues tofly in the Republican V-bird formation.


Buchanan begins his article,
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>


"What happened to the Age of Obama?

Glancing over the New York Times Book Review Sunday, one finds three of the top four non-fiction best-sellers were written by conservatives -- columnist Michelle Malkin, talk-show host Mark Levin and Fox News contributor Dick Morris.

At No. 10, in its 40th week on the list, is Bill O'Reilly's memoir. No. 1 best-seller in paperback: Glenn Beck's "Common Sense." </BLOCKQUOTE>


Malkin, Levin, Morris, O'Reilly and Beck. Populists? All are supporters ofNAFTA and a laisse-faire economic philosophy, though Buchanan claims in his article that ,
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>


"George H.W. Bush never saw the rebellion of 1992 coming and watched Ross Perot waltz off with a third of his 1988 voters. The anger in Middle America today looks much like what erupted in the NAFTA debate of 1993..." </BLOCKQUOTE>


Buchanan also writes,
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>


" 1969, the national press was writing that President Nixon must yield to the hundreds of thousands ringing the White House. Nixon went on national TV to call on the Silent Majority to stand by him.

They did, for four years.

One recalls Sen. Ed Muskie blurting out, after being crushed in the Florida primary by George Wallace, that he didn't know there were that many racists in Florida. That was the end of Ed. And in the fall, the Floridians flooded to Nixon, who did not insult them."</BLOCKQUOTE>


Malkin, Levin, Morris, Beck and O'Reilly would all agree with the sentiments of Muskie, and if there was a vote amongst them, including Buchanan, John McCain or George Wallace, McCain would win five of the six votes cast. These five GOP operatives constantly proclaim that one of the reasons they are Republicans is because the Democratic Party is the party of Byrd, Wallace and Rarick (i.e. white racists).


Pat, these GOP fab-Five book sales is not indicative ofthe "populist right rising". The answer lies elsewhere.Edited by: GardenState

[Nelson3]

So true, Gard. The Silent Majority has yet to be heard from 40 years after Nixon made Prez. I guess the Moral Majority sank beneath the waves when Jerry Foolwell's organization of that name went belly-up. Of course they'd always stood for Izrul </span>with Jerry, ho hum.

As for the "Republican Revolution" of 1992, few things have ever made me gag more for their sheer, overrated phoniness. (Well, until Sarah Palin came along.[img]smileys/smiley11.gif[/img]) Somebody published a "mainstream" article that year demonstrating that the same exact thing had happened like during the 1940s but -- due to its obvious meaninglessness and fakery -- it had been completely forgotten by the lumbering hordes of "middle America". (Mediocre amerika -- lukewarm -- yellow-stripe-walking, fence-sitting ameriKa, is that closer to the truth?)

"...hecontinues tofly in the Republican V-bird formation" -- ROTF!!! Gard, when are you going to do some writing for the Nationalist Times? You're just made for it and will help lighten things up with your rapier wit and gusto.
[img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]

Edited by: Nelson3

[gardenstate]

Thank you for the compliment, Nelson.

I prefer reading over writing in the spare time I have, hence the reason for so few posts here. I also acknowledge my limitations as a writer. However, for your reading pleasure Nelson, the following posts are Letters to the Editor that were published in the TNT.
January edition of TNT:


Former Congressman Tells the Truth



Former Indiana Congressman John N. Hostettler has just published an informative book, “Nothing for the Nation: Who Got What Out of Iraq.” Hostettler was just one of six Republicans to vote against the October 2002 resolution to authorize President George W. Bush to invade Iraq. The book is a systematic study of why the Bush administration invaded Iraq.

Hostettler chronicles the events leading up to the vote on the "Iraq War Resolution," and provides the reasons for why he voted against it on constitutional and empirical grounds. The most heartening aspect of the book is that Hostettler bluntly states what few politicians dare not say publicly -- that the reason the Bush administration invaded Iraq was, "not the salvation of the republic but the securing of the realm" for the state of Israel.


Hostettler details the connection between the disinformation peddled by the Iraqi National Congress, who wanted to see Saddam removed, and the Office of Special Plans headed by Under Secretary of Defense Douglass Feith and staffed with Jewish and Christian Zionists who assessed, manipulated and disseminated this disinformation to the media, the Congress and the public. The 9/11 terrorist attacks were used as a pre-text in the justification for the implementation of the 1996 Zionist white paper. "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." Hostettler describes this paper as a "thesis for the economic and physical security of Israel."


He comes to the conclusion that the reason for war was not because Saddam was connected to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, or that he had "weapons of mass destruction,” or that he posed an imminent threat to America; clearly all three propositions were untrue, but that the neo-conservative Bush administration wanted to remove Saddam in the interest of Israel's security.

This is not news to readers of The Nationalist Times, but it sure is welcoming.


SECRETARY OF STATE, OR HILLARY OF ARABIA? (February edition)


At the Imperial War Museum in Britain there is a map of the Middle East exhibited, drawn up by T.E. Lawrence, a Lieutenant Colonel in the British Army, that he presented to Britain's War Cabinet in 1918. The map proposed to create new boundaries out of the defeated Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I.


Lawrence's grand vision of British military supremacy would slowly fade over the next thirty years. The collapse of the British Empire at the end of the Second World War was the end result of her fratricidal war against Germany, her previous military over-extension around the world, and her ongoing occupation and meddling in Mesopotamia since 1918. History teaches that every Empire has declined due to its foolish attempt in trying to transform peoples and nations into subjects.


Senator Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of State for the new Obama administration. Clinton voted in 2002 to give President Bush the authorization to launch a pre-emptive attack on Iraq, and stands by her decision that the vote was a correct one. Presidential candidate Clinton opposed the way the Bush administration has handled the military occupation of Iraq, but never waned in her support for the war itself.


During the last debate before the Pennsylvania primary, candidate Clinton was asked if an attack on Israel by Iran should be seen as an attack on America. Her response:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>


"I think we should be looking to be creating an umbrella of deterrence that goes much further than Israel. Of course I would make it clear to the Iranians that an attack on Israel would incur massive retaliation from the United States, but I would do the same with other countries in the region. . . we've got to deter other countries from feeling that they have to acquire nuclear weapons.


“You can't go to the Saudis or the Kuwaitis or the United Arab Emirates and others who have legitimate concern about Iran and say, 'Well, don't acquire these weapons to defend yourself,' unless you're willing to say we will provide a deterrent backup. And we will let the Iranians know, that, yes, an attack on Israel would trigger massive retaliation. But so would an attack on those countries that are willing to go under the security umbrella and forswear their own nuclear ambitions. And finally, we cannot permit Iran to become a nuclear weapons power." </BLOCKQUOTE>


What Senator Clinton failed to mention in her response is that Israel possesses a tremendous nuclear arsenal, and that an attack by Iran will not happen because the Iranian leaders know that a military attack would result in a possible nuclear strike against their country. The current Iranian regime is pursuing a nuclear program so as to create a deterrent against any future Israeli or American plans for "regime change" in Tehran.


American and Israeli military attacks over the last fifty years have targeted only countries that did not have a nuclear weapons capability (Egypt, Lebanon, Panama, Somalia, Serbia, Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan). The former Soviet Union, North Korea and Pakistan all possessed nuclear weapons, thereby insuring themselves against a military invasion of their territory.


Clinton's position that she would use American military force and intervene in any regional conflict that involves Iran was also the stated policy of the Bush Administration. The acclaimed movie Lawrence of Arabia glorified the escapades of T.E. Lawrence in his defense and fight for his belief in British supremacy. Today, in an age of nuclear weapons, a movie based on the unyielding belief in American supremacy would be a a horror film best not made.

[Nelson3]

Superb material. Mini-articles -- you've got the stuff!

Hillary of Arabia -- how true. Since she's supposedly "the smartest woman in the world", wouldn't you think some original thought would occur to her at some point -- or merely the notion of the need for one, maybe once every ten years? She is SO doctrinaire liberal-Zionist. Just work to bring about everything the Founding Fathers would have hated (the blasted wiggy old white men) -- that seems to be all there is to her, ever. Why can't life be that simple for everybody?[img]smileys/smiley19.gif[/img]

Obama and Hillary Caught Kissing!</span>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHDWo2LNIaM

Hillary WASN'T LYING! Bosnia gunfire footage discovered...</span>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHVED...;feature=PlayL ist&amp;p=2515DE489A537A61&amp;playnext=1&amp;play next_from= PL&amp;index=5

Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

What's come over little Glenny? He's flirted with racial reality two days in a row!

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/show...09/08/glenn-be ck-ignores-ad-boycott.html<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" ="entry-er">UPDATED: Glenn Beck goes after Color of Change co-founder Van Jones</h1>


<div ="time" style="margin-bottom: 8px; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">August 24, 2009| 3:41</span>
pm</div>
Whenever something like this happens, I dream that one can even take it as a sort of temerpature or litmus reading of how grassroots outrage is pushing the media truth-o-meter further and further toward the right without half realizing it. Will Glenny burst my bubble by calling patriots racists again tomorrow? He's kind of erratic.

I'm glad Castro is deeply concerned about racism in ameriKa too. It could help Obama regain the courage he needs to get up each morning!

Isn't it gratifying, too, that Fidelito mentions what he imagines to be our ilk. Not that he's probably ever met a single American nationalist or personally witnessed any evidence of the putative "racism" </span>he decries here -- but great world leaders like him have magical powers, as you know. All they have to do is utter a thing and it becomes true retroactively and instantaneously.

http://www.reuters.com/article/polit...USB30869920090 825?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=politicsNews&amp;rpc =22&amp;sp =true<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Fidel Castro says racist right-wingers fight Obama</h1>
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" ="timestamp">Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:06am EDT</div>

HAVANA (Reuters) - President Barack Obama is trying to make positive
changes in the United States, but is being fought at every turn by
right-wingers who hate him because he is black, former Cuban leader
Fidel Castro said on Tuesday.

In an unusually conciliatory column in the state-run media, Castro
said Obama had inherited many problems from his predecessor, George W.
Bush, and was trying to resolve them. But the "powerful extreme right
won't be happy with anything that diminishes their prerogatives in the
slightest way."

Obama does not want to change the U.S. political and economic
system, but "in spite of that, the extreme right hates him for being
African-American and fights what the president does to improve the
deteriorated image of that country," Castro wrote.(I'm raiding Drudge -- can you tell?)

[Nelson3]

Glenn Beck talks pure Americanism (no "k") and predicts heads are going to roll.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDQ7UjUybIA

[Nelson3]

Here's Pat putting the screws on the great Larry McDonald -- TV interview from 1:13 on.

THE SECRET RIGHT- VOLUME ONE</span>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfhLJ7Kw8xE

That was when he was still very establishment himself, I guess. But to show you what a freakish world this really is, this Youtube file is a movie by a young working-class type whose only passion seems to be exposing the Council for National Policy, not the TC, CFR etc. whom he also covers here. What is this, a put-up job with a liberal yuppie donning visor cap and plaid flannels for a "role"? You know, like the famous nobody who babbled the scripted version of how 9/11 happened on live Fox news seconds after it did -- minute 3:10 on in this video:

La Caida de las Torres Gemelas: Misterios del 911</span>
http://mejores-videos-internet.blogs...07/05/la-caida -de-las-torres-gemelas.html

The film by the way is probably part of a National Prayer Network exposé (Rev. and Mrs. Ted Pike).

Getting back to the SECRET RIGHT</span> guy, his narration is ambiguous-- mentions The Spotlight in a seemingly approving vein -- but in a caption at 1:26:25 he virtually equates </span>the CNP and CFR. Am I missing something?

Edited by: Nelson3

[DixieDestroyer]

Nelson3, Larry McDonald is still a hero to many of us Georgians. [img]smileys/smiley1.gif[/img]

IMO, the TC, CFR and CNP are all part of the Globalist Elite network. Combine these power orgs with the Bilderberg Group, Club of Rome, KoM, etc...and look at the common, most senior members...those are the upper echelon of the NWO IMO.

Fyi, here's Dr.Monteith's outstanding expose, "The Brotherhood of Darkness"...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbfl3iyA6bA

[Nelson3]

Sure enough, Dr. Larry McDonald is every true conservative or nationalist's hero. Among other things, a martyr to the cause of truth -- the KAL 7 crisis was almost certainly the work of the very people and groups you and Dr. Monteith rightly decry. He was THE Congressman standing up to communism at the time -- 30 years after McCarthy. Ron Paul was in Congress, but how well known yet?

Am hearing Dr. Monteith now -- sounds good. I like his literary references. Must send it to my former organ student, a homeschooled Christian princess whose favorite hymn is Once to Every Man and Nation, whose text Dr. Monteith reads in minute 9.

My, he mentions the Aquarian Conspiracy book. I bought it but couldn't make heads of tales of it. Probably just too distracted at the time.


Edited by: Nelson3

[DixieDestroyer]

Dr.Monteith is a retired Orthopedic Surgeon who's been studying the NWO for 40+ years. Here's his website/radio show...

http://www.radioliberty.com/

[Don Wassall]

Maybe Pat Buchanan has schizophrenia. As time goes on I have less and less respect for him, including his presidential runs, which, quite unlike Ron Paul's genuine movement, left behind zilch -- no political organizations, no meeting groups, no "Buchananites" running for office at all levels of government, nada.


Paul ignores some unignorable issues, but he is clearly sincere and has built a national grassroots movement and organization from almost nothing, one that was waiting for someone like him to ignite it, one that waited for Buchanan for many years but was continuously thwarted and frustrated by the "Pat and Bay Pony Show."

[Nelson3]

Liberals are never wrong because of their lovely.... fluffy..... endearing...... evergreen..... good intentions!</span> [img]smileys/smiley1.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley1.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley1.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley1.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley1.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley1.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley4.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley4.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley4.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley4.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley10.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley10.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley10.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley10.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley10.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley14.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley14.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley14.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley14.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley14.gif[/img]

[Nelson3]

Add Dave Daubenmire if you haven't already. Or cross him off if he's come fully over into the real world.

This great column per ANU news page. It well embodies two of the quantities modern ameriKa is most urgently in need of -- bedrock truth and crushing sarcasm, the latter applied most notably to its most famous practitioners, "liberal" change agents.

ATHEISM
IS A FRAUD</font>
http://www.newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave177.htm

[Nelson3]

Add Dick Armey -- significantly:

https://www.anu.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3127

[Nelson3]

PJB's off his medicine again.

<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">America Cannot Go to War for Israel</span></div>
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Patrick Buchanan</span></div>
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">August 19, 2010</div>
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><a href="http://ssomail.charter.net/do/redirect?url=http%253A%252F%252Fbuchanan.org%252Fb log%252Famerica-cannot-go-to-war-for-israel-4291" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" target="_blank">
</a> http://buchanan.org/blog/america-can...war-for-israel -4291</span></div>

<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Excerpt: </div>
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">We have a responsibility to stop this hysterical march to war.
Iran</span> does not pose any threat to America. The men pushing this war lied to us
about Iraq</span>, and they’re lying now about Iran. The warmongers and profiteers must
be forced back into their kennels. They must be discredited and shamed. America
cannot fight another war built on lies. America cannot afford another war for
Israel.</div>

[Nelson3]

Glenny Becksky, Commissar For Racial Thought Processes.
&gt; From: &lt;kojoju@charter.net&gt;
&gt; To: thetimesexaminer@bellsouth.net
&gt; Subject: STATES RIGHTS IN DANGER OF ABOLISHMENT
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Dear Editor:
&gt;
&gt; If your readers are counted among those who believe that our National
&gt; Constitution under language of the 10th AMENDMENT, requires and upholds
&gt; the sovereignty of the states, they need to know the following
information.
&gt;
&gt; Glenn Beck on his July 30 Television Program hosted three Tea Party
leaders.
&gt; The discussion dealt with the member of a particular Tea Party Group who
&gt; was accused of racist remarks. Glenn Beck inquired whether that man
&gt; had been put out of his Tea Party Group. The Tea Party Leaders responded
&gt; "yes", as would anyone guilty of such action.
&gt;
&gt; Glenn Beck then inquired what action would be taken if any members opposed
&gt; the 14th A MENDMENT? NO RESPONSE. Glenn Beck asked "would you put
&gt; such people out of the Tea Party Organizqtion?' They responded yes, to
which
&gt; Mr. Beck stated such must be the action taken.
&gt;
&gt; Within the next week both Sens. John McCain and John Kyl made the
following
&gt; statements re: the 14th AMENTMENT on the Mike Gallagher national
&gt; radio program.
&gt;
&gt; "With the passage of the 14th AMENDMENT citizens changed from being
citizens of the states to citizens of the Federal Government" (John McCain)
&gt;
&gt; The Federal Government has supreme power over the states, and any
&gt; legislation of the state is superceded by the Federal Government, and is
&gt; therefore subject to abolishment by the Feds. (John Kyl)
&gt;
&gt; No statements to the fact that the 14th AMENDMENT has never been ratified.
&gt;
&gt; Those statements by two federal senators beg the question of what will
happen
&gt; to the actions of those states that have courageously passed legislation
&gt; in opposition to Obama's healthcare abomination, and any attempt to oppose
&gt; amnesty for illegals, in order to control the economic harm to which
&gt; states are subject.
&gt; If anyone reading this plans to attend Glenn Becks appearance in Sececa on
&gt; Sept. 17, perhaps they will ask him why he supports the 14th AMENDMENT.
&gt;
&gt; Juliette Kozak
&gt; Easley, SC
&gt;
&gt; Earnestly Contend for the Faith once delivered to the Saints Jude 3
&gt; &gt;

</pre>LATER.<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><h2 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
Glenn Beck Cult Holds Creepy Revival at Lincoln Memorial in D.C. </h2>
<div style="width: 100%; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">

People gathered Saturday in D.C. at the Lincoln Memorial as part of an
event that Glenn Beck was hosting. The rally was a hybrid neocon pep
rally/religious revival, consisting of pictures on a giant TV screen of
famous moments from American history, along with inspirational music,
waving flags, and talk of destiny and God from a loudmouth Fox News
preacher who hides the insincerity in his eyes behind a thick layer of
glasses while weeping in breathy sobs to mask his laughter. http://www.infowars.com/glenn-beck-c...creepy-revival -at-lincoln-memorial-in-dc/ </div>



Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

davidduke.com

<h2 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">9/16/2010</h2><h3 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="post-19416">Ann Coulter, Free Speech and Canada</h3><div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Posted under:<ul>[*]General[/list]— @ 2:36 am<div align="right"> </div></div>Ann Coulter, Free Speech and Canada</span>by Jeff DavisAnn Coulter is turning Canada’s infamous hate crime laws against the very left wing establishment that created them.The Vancouver Sun
reports: “Inflammatory right-wing pundit Ann Coulter took aim at a
University of Ottawa administrator Monday night, saying an e-mail from
the school warning her to use restraint, respect and consideration when
addressing Ontario students during a speaking tour this week made her a
victim of a hate crime. Speaking to students and academics at the
University of Western Ontario Monday, Coulter said the e-mail sent to
her Friday by Francois Houle, vice-president academic and provost of
the University of Ottawa, targeted her as a member of an identifiable
group and as such, she will be filing a complaint with the Human Rights
Commission alleging hate speech. ‘I’m sure the Human Rights Commission
will get to the bottom of it,’ Coulter said to loud cheers from the
800-strong audience. ‘I think I’m the victim of a hate crime here.
Either what (Mr. Houle) did was a hate crime, or the whole commission
is BS.’ ”Canada has some of the most draconian hate crime laws
in the world. Even criticism of the government can fall into the
cateogry of being a hate crime. So Miss Coulter is not really
stretching things by insisting that the same hate crime laws that
protect every flaming liberal organization in Canada, including the
government, should be applied to protect conservatives especially if
some liberal hack is trying to tell her to not exercise her free
speech. (more…)LATER. Alex Jones exposes Beck as an "ACTOR" and "PRANCING CREATURE" hired to eclipse him and pollute his truths with lies.

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/...1-02-24-glenn- becks-secret.htm?From=News

On the other hand.... EAT YOUR HEART OUT, Alex!

BECK IS RIGHT! "SECULAR" JUDAISM IS LIKE RADICAL ISLAM
</span></span>
By Rev. Ted Pike
24 Feb 11
</span></span>
Tea
Party leader and talk host Glenn Beck is under attack again by
left-wing Jewry for this recent on-air comment: "There are the Orthodox
rabbis, and there are the Reform rabbis. Reformed (sic) rabbis are
generally political in nature. It's almost like radicalized Islam where
it is just -- radicalized Islam is less about religion than it is about
politics."</span></span>


Jewish
attack groups quickly demonized Beck's remarks, alleging that his
comparison of the Jewish supremacist rabbis of Reform (secular) Judaism
to Islamic supremacists merits immediate apology. ADL head Abe Foxman
said Beck's remarks are "beyond the pale" and "discount the faith" of
Reform Jews.</span></span>


Yet
Beck is getting very, very close to the truth. Jewish supremacism,
epitomized by the secularist Reform rabbis who want Beck fired from FOX
News, is actually much more of a threat to civilization than is radical
Islam.</span></span>


Here is my July 10, 2007 article explaining why:</span></span>

<h3>WHY WE SHOULD FEAR ZIONISM MORE THAN ISLAM</span></span></span></h3>
By Rev. Ted Pike</span>
10 Jul 07

</span></span></span></span></span>www.truthtellers.org


Edited by: Nelson3