FEDERAL JUDGE BANS FORCED VACCINATIONS

[Nelson3]

........in New Jersey, no less. Emphasis added.

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-335421

US Judge Rules Against Compulsory Vaccinations</font><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"></font>30 years after compulsory vaccination became US Law:US Court issues an injunction to stop it and to hold the the government and drug companies responsible for reactions.A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New Jersey.This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal government as defendant.When
the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will stop the federal
government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu vaccine against
their will. It will also prevent a state or local government from
forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person who is not
vaccinated from being denied any services or constitutional rights.Vawter’s
filings included a Complaint, and several pages of evidentiary
Exhibits. Vawter’s legal papers have been written not only for filing
in federal </span>court, but additionally so they can be looked at by
activists around the world for ideas on filing lawsuits in their own
countries</span> </font>to help stop forced vaccinations.Vawter
believes that as the truth of the dangers of flu vaccines continues to
become known, banning the forced use of them will eventually succeed on
a worldwide basis. He cautions people to avoid fear and keep themselves
focused on the task of blocking forced vaccination. Preliminary
Injunction will immediately halt mandatory vaccinations in the U.S.The
Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read the
papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction that it
appears the federal government has engaged in some amount of negligence
with regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu
vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence
submitted does warrant a more thorough investigation into the safety of
the flu vaccines.

The
Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from forcing any
person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that
person’s free will and free choice. The government will not allow any
state or local government, or any party, to force any person to be
required to take any influenza vaccination against that person’s free
will and free choice</span></span>............THE SUIT </font>

</span></font>http://www.safetylawsuits.com/complaint.html


Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

Somebody tells me it's not so. In Youtube, Vawter says the case "is scheduled for rehearing on Oct 19, 2009." Hope we haven't been scammed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrzDAF4gYAU