An article entitled "Looting, violence, gunfire erupt in Haiti."
Similar disasters have hit European and Oriental nations in recent years but you never see any of the violence like you saw in majority black New Orleans or now Haiti.
http://cofcc.org/2010/01/looting-vio...ire-erupt-in-h aiti/
An article entitled "Haitians going bananas. Loot, fight, block roads with piles of corpses."
[ed - On my local news yesterday an anchorman actually stated, "there is a race against time to get aid to the Haitians before more rioting and violence starts. Where else in the world do natural disasters result in mass violence and looting? ] [ Maybe New Orleans?]
http://cofcc.org/2010/01/haitians-go...as-loot-fight- block-roads-with-piles-of-corpses/
An article entitled "Coming soon near you: A Haitian Deluge"
With the unerring news sense that makes the site so valuable, the Drudge Report has as its leading story this morning
RED CROSS plan to bring 45,000 evacuees from Haiti to Florida; ‘Mass migration’…
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/...ng-soon-near-y ou-a-haitian-deluge/
Well, that's just it. Everything th System does today is aimed at "celebrating diversity", i.e. bashing white civilzation to smithereens.
This just in (thanks, Frank) -- a perfect case of the kind of gratitude groveling to minorities brings you. "This is not our culture"</span> -- where did the "president" of Haiti learn such perfect liberal/minority buzz-speak? Must have received lower indoctrination at Yale or Princeton.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60G2DF20100117
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Haiti's voodoo priests object to mass burials</h1>
An article entitled "The Real Problem With Haiti"
The expectations will exceed the realities of what can realistically be accomplished and sustained in Haiti. Here’s what we can expect: Aid levels will be insufficient or botched in terms of deliveries to the needy; infrastructure assistance will be less than adequate; lawlessness and anarchy will require a permanent security presence from UN and U.S. troops; corruption will undermine some of the aid; whatever is rebuilt will eventually deteriorate again and the "Island of the Damned" will continue to be what as it has been since independence — an unlivable hell on earth. Critics will invoke "memories" of Katrina to deflect the real problem facing Haiti’s future: a population unable to govern or sustain itself.
Little has changed in the 120 years since Sir Spencer St. John, "Her Majesty’s Minister Resident and Consul-General", described Haiti ("or the Black Republic") as a corrupt peasant society rampant with voodoo and cannibalism. Chances are 10, 20, or 50 years from now Haiti will pretty much resemble its post-independence national character as a destitute and uncivil society.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/...real-problem-w ith-haiti/
A lady on a C-SPAN call-in a day or so ago insisted that, in view of the fact that Haiti has been reduced to rubble which must be cleared before reconstruction can commence, we in the United States should take in the nine or ten million Haitians until their homeland has been rebuilt.
Well, God works in mysterious ways His miracles to perform; disaster may be on our own heels and I fear the worst!
The PTB's MSM keeps the endless "White Guilt" propaganda coming...not so subtly by pushing for handouts for the Haitian untermenschen. I say our (taxpayer funded) government shouldn't be dropping 1 plug nickel on Haiti! [img]smileys/smiley7.gif[/img]
DD, you are INSENSITIVE and totally lacking in COMPASSION.
[img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img]
An article entitled "225,000 children are slaves in Haiti says Pan American Development Foundation"
http://cofcc.org/2010/01/225000-chil...laves-in-haiti -says-pan-american-developement-foundation/
An article entitled "Relief efforts delayed as Haitians attack distribution points, refuse to help unload planes and trucks."
This must be what the Huffington Post called "queuing for aid" in their attack piece on cofcc.org. Aid convoys must have armed escorts as Haitians fight each other to get the most aid. Even blocking exits with piles of dead bodies to block aid trucks from getting to neighboring towns.
Another shocking development is the refusal of Haitians to help unload their own aid from planes and trucks. The US military is telling private charities and foreign governments they must bring their own work crews and Haitians are refusing to do it. A big story yesterday was about United Airlines flying 60 Chicago volunteers to Haiti to unload planes. It’s unbelievable that in a nation of ten million, white people from Chicago have to be flown all the way to Haiti to unload the planes.
Whenever Haitians are asked to unload anything, they grab as much stuff as they can and run away. In many cases, armed and masked UN soldiers have to hold Haitian thugs back at gun point while UN workers unload trucks.
After the massive tsunami in Southeast Asia, none of the absurd behavior seen in Haiti went on. That disaster was much, much bigger and spread across numerous nations.
http://cofcc.org/2010/01/haitians-attack-aid-center/
It wouldn't surprise me one bit if the NWO has the tech to have caused the earthquake and the depravity to use it.
http://blacklistednews.com/news-7136-0-5-5--.html
Commentary-Analysis
<hr size="1" width="98%">
<table width="98%" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><t><tr style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><td colspan="2" ="title">Are We in Haiti because of Oil?</font></td></tr>
<tr><td ="textsmall">Published on01-21-2010</td><td ="textsmall" align="right">Email To FriendPrint Version
</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2">
By Peter Schlosser - BLN Contributing Writer</span></td></tr></t></table>
An article entitled " Import Haitians! They keep on trying…"
With eerie precision, barely hours after the "Neocon’s Neocon" Elliot Abrams published a demand that large quantities of Haitians should be allowed to immigrate to America because of the earthquake, an individual named Chris Berg has used his access to the Australian MSM to demand the same thing.
Cut the Red Tape: Why Haitians Need Humanitarian Parole Now Jeffrey Kahn and Aaron Zelinsky January 23, 2010
suggests that importing the Haitian injured should be the stratagem.
No thought of course is given to the fact that this would involve huge transfers of scarce medical resources away from Americans who have paid for them through insurance and tax deductions.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/...rt-haitians-th ey-keep-on-trying/
With an acknowledged (emphasis on the word "acknowledged") 10 percent unemployment, a few million guest workers is just what we need.
Yes, "Abrams" and "Berg"--is further comment required?
Haitians are as their ancestors. Even the Negro's predecessors, the Arawak Indians were known cannibals. Curses upon those who would give aid to such a people. -AF
http://sfawbn.com/news/?p=1527#more-1527
The history behind the situation in Haiti…
The sources are cited in the text of the article below… so if you are a skeptic, do your own research (SFA editor)…
Black Haitians Committed Genocide
Against Whites in their Revolution
In their revolution, Haiitians massacred and committed genocide against the the White (French) settlers who had made this tropical land rich and blooming with crops. Tens of thousands of Europeans were shot, hanged, hacked, raped, poisoned and burned alive. [The lowest estimate is 24,000 killed, according to Thomas Ott, The Haitian Revolution, 1789-1804.]
Haiti has been a cursed, poverty stricken, violent, degraded basketcase ever since.
In 1965 the following appeared in Time Magazine during a more honest and less politically correct time:
In the 1780s, its foreign trade approached $140 million a year, with vast profits from sugar, coffee, cocoa, cotton and indigo
In 1804, a former slave named Jean Jacques Dessalines proclaimed Haiti a free and independent nation and became its Governor General. "To draw up the charter of our independence," he felt, "would require the skin of a white man as parchment, his skull as an inkwell, his blood as ink, and a bayonet as a pen." Dessalines died by an assassin’s bullet within three years. His successor, Henri Christophe, cared little for charters, black or white. He proclaimed himself King, set up a ludicrous aristocracy (such titles as the Duke of Marmelade and Count of Limonade), and ruled as a merciless despot until 1820, when his officers revolted, and he committed suicide by firing a silver bullet into his brain. …
No sooner had the Dominican Republic declared its independence in 1821 than it was invaded by neighboring Haiti, which occupied the country for 22 brutal years. The Haitians banned all foreign priests, severed papal relations, closed the University of Santo Domingo, and levied confiscatory taxes. …
Over the next century, dictator followed dictator in Haiti. By 1910, rebellions had ousted 13 of Haiti’s first 18 Presidents. Within 47 months, one President was blown up in his palace, another was poisoned, three were deposed, and the last was grabbed by a mob and hacked into small pieces.
President Woodrow Wilson finally ordered U.S. Marines to occupy the country in 1915. They remained 19 years, and gave Haiti the only true peace it has ever known. Acting through puppet Presidents, they disarmed rebels and bandits, built roads, irrigation projects, sanitation facilities, and organized schools and hospitals. F.D.R. withdrew the marines in 1934 and Haiti returned to its old ways: nine governments in 20 years, the last headed by François ("Papa Doc") Duvalier, 58, a country physician who took office in 1957, proclaimed himself "President for life," and ruled through voodoo mysticism and strong-arm terror of his 5,000-man Tonton Macoute secret police. …
"Haitians," says Duvalier in his soft whisper, "have a destiny to suffer."
And if his people complain, they can pray from a Catechism of the Revolution turned out by the Government Printing Office and circulating last week in Port-au-Prince. The Lord’s Prayer: "Our Doc who art in the National Palace for Life, hallowed be Thy name by present and future generations, Thy will be done at Port-au-Prince and the provinces. Give us this day our new Haiti and never forgive the trespasses of the enemies of the Fatherland, who spit every day on our Country. Let them succumb to temptation and under the weight of their own venom. Deliver them not from any evil. Amen." (Time, May 7, 1965)
It becomes more glaring each day that next to nothing is being done to help mostly White Americans who have been forclosed out of their homes,the number is over 1 million with more to come,glaring also is no aid to White South Africans and no effort to relocate White South African children to the U.S.,the ethnic cleansing continues there unabated.
Greetings LabMan,
You make a great point , with which I agree.
One of my definite charities goes to the White South Afrikan orphans. -AF
Richard Kelly Hoskins has been sending over $1000 a month (for years) to orphans (whose parents have been murdered by blacks) and other needy kinsmen in South Africa. Make checks out to "Richard Kelly Hoskins" and please write "gift" on the check. He has a S.A. address in which you can send money directly to the orphanage, but about half of each check is taken by the S.A. bank for service fees. Otherwise please send your gifts to:
Richard Kelly Hoskins
P.O. Box 997
Lynchburg, Virginia
24505
www.richardhoskins.com/
Guilty as charged partner! [img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img] [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]Originally Posted by Nelson3
Fyi, here's a good article Don posted on ANU News...
Haiti Must Not be Reb</span>uilt</span>
Alex Kurtagic</span>
January 25, 2010
Day after day, our brains are blitzed by the media with the horror
from Haiti. While I would not wish a like disaster to befall my friends and
loved ones, I cannot help but roll my eyes at the Western governments’ response.
<u1></u1
></span>
I
do not mind the initiatives to forgive Haiti’s external debt, as I understand
enough about modern banking to know that banks lose nothing except profits when
writing off a so-called ‘loan’: </span>W</span>hen banks issue a ‘loan’, as it happens, they are not lending actual
assets that they have in their possession, but are, in, fact, creating an
electronic fiction, out of nothing and backed by nothing, with a few keystrokes
and clicks of a mouse on a computer. For this and other reasons, which I shall
discuss later, I fully agree with the idea of writing off Haiti’s
loans.<u1></u1
></span>
I
also do not mind Western charities lending succour to the victims, provided said
charities are private institutions, funded by private, consenting
donors.<u1></u1
></span>
In agreement with <b style=""><a href="http://www.house.gov/list/speech/tx14_paul/Haiti.shtml" target="_blank">Cong. Ron
Paul</span></a>[/b], </span>
however, </span>I do mind when a Western government, such
as that of Barack Obama in the United States, seeks to </span>commit
its taxpayer’s money to a programme of reconstruction</span>
in that part of the world. This is not so much because Western countries are all
technically bankrupt and have been for years: after all, we still have the
material means and intellectual wherewithal to extricate ourselves from our
economic plight. No. This is because reconstructing Haiti would simply repeat
the mistakes of the past, which have shown, conclusively and supported by
examples elsewhere, that any effort to encourage a former colony now run by
Black Africans to become a Western-style society, complete with rule of law, a
thriving market economy, property rights, industrial production, modern
communications, and the like, is futile and counterproductive. Haiti must not be
re-built.<u1></u1
></span>
Haiti’s death toll — currently estimated at 200,000 — might have been
caused by an earthquake, but it did not have to be that high. Walter E.
Williams, professor of economics at George Mason University, </span>pointed out</span> a few days ago
that<u1></u1
></span>
Northern California’s 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake was more violent,
measuring 7.1 on the Richter scale, resulting in 63 deaths and 3,757 injuries.
The 1906 San Francisco earthquake measured 7.8 on the Richter scale, about eight
times more violent than Haiti’s, and cost 3,000 lives</span>.
<u1></u1
></span>
That Haiti’s death toll was 3,000 times higher than that of Loma
Prieta, and 66 times higher than that of San Francisco owes less to an
"especially cruel and incomprehensible" cataclysm than to Haitian’s lack of
work-ethic, corruption, and ability to plan ahead. <u1></u1
></span>
True, Haiti is one of the world’s least developed countries and the
poorest in the Western hemisphere, <a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ha.html" target="_blank">with 80% living below the poverty line and 54% living in abject
poverty</span></a>; and, in our world, calamities only multiply in the
absence of money — without money it is difficult to do anything. But Haiti was
not always poor. In the 18th century, Haiti, then under French rule and called
Saint-Domingue, was the most prosperous French colony in the New World. Its
enormously profitable plantations produced sugar, coffee, cotton, and indigo,
and drew in tens of thousands of French settlers. The impoverishment of Haiti,
the first Black-ruled republic </span>on the
planet</span>,
with a population that is 95% Black</span>, has taken place since its independence in
1804. In the struggle for independence, nearly 200 plantations were burnt or
destroyed, and 24,000 of the by then 40,000 White settlers were killed.
</span>
Since then, there have been 32 coups d’etats</span>, the forests have been destroyed,
the population has exploded, and Haiti has come to rank near the bottom out of
179 countries in <a href="http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009" target="_blank">Transparency International’s
Corruption Perceptions Index</span></a></span>. Indeed, the situation
has become so chaotic at times that the United States has been forced to deploy
troops there on three separate occasions: in 1915 (until 1934), during which
time the United States funded a huge reconstruction programme; in 1958, during
which time the United States attempted to once again rebuild Haiti’s economic
infrastructure; and in 1994 (until 1996), during which time yet another rebuild
tool place under Operation Uphold Democracy</span> and Operation New Horizons</span>.<u1><a name="AK"></a></u1
></span>
The situation before the quake was no better a century ago. Writing
in 1900, Hesketh Pritchard, an explorer and fellow of the Royal Geographic
Society, reported in his book Where Black Rules White: A Journey Across and
About Hayti:<u1></u1
></span>
What most astonishes the traveller in Hayti is that they have
everything there. Ask for what you please, the answer invariably is, ‘Yes, yes,
we have it.’ They possess everything that a civilised and progressive nation can
desire. Electric light? They proudly point to a [power] plant on a hilltop
outside the town. Constitutional government? A Chamber of Deputies elected by
public vote, a Senate, and all the elaborate paraphernalia of the law: they are
to be found here, seemingly all of them. Institutions, churches, schools, roads,
railways . . . On paper their system is flawless . . . If one puts one’s trust
in the mirage of hearsay, the Haitians can boast of possessing all desirable
things, but on nearer approach these pleasant prospects are apt to take on
another complexion.</span>
<u1></u1
></span>
For instance, you are standing in what was once a building, but is
now a spindle-shanked ghost of its former self. A single man, nursing a broken
leg, sprawls on the black, earthen floor; a pile of wooden beds is heaped in the
north corner; rain has formed a pool in the middle of the room, crawling and
spreading into an ever wider circle as the last shower drips from the roof. Some
filthy sheets lie wound into a sticky ball on two beds, one of which is
overturned. A large, iron washing tub stands in the open doorway.
<u1></u1
></span>
Now where are you? It would be impossible to guess. As a matter of
fact, you are in the Military Hospital of the second most important town of
Hayti, a state-supported concern in which the soldiers of the Republic are
supposed to be cured of all the ills of the flesh . . .
<u1></u1
></span>
It was the same with the electric light. The [power] plant was here,
but it did not work. It was the same with the [Army’s] cannon. There are cannon,
but they won’t go off. It was the same with their railways. They were being
‘hurried forward,’ but they never progressed. It was the same with
everything</span>.<u1></u1
></span>
Pritchard’s account is often sympathetic towards Haitians, but, all
the same, the picture that emerges is very negative. In the final chapter, the
explorer concluded:<u1></u1
></span>
The
present condition of Hayti gives the best possible answer to the question, and,
considering the experiment has lasted for a century, perhaps also a conclusive
one. For a century the answer has been working itself out there in flesh and
blood. The Negro has had his chance, a fair field, and no favor. He has had the
most beautiful and fertile of the Caribbees for his own; he has had the
advantage of excellent French laws; he inherited a made country, with Cap
Haitien for its Paris . . . Here was a wide land sown with prosperity, a land of
wood, water, towns and plantations, and in the midst of it the Black man was
turned loose to work out his own salvation. What has he made of the chances that
were given to him? . . . Today in Haiti we come to the real crux of the
question. At the end of a hundred years of trial, how does the black man governs
himself? What progress has he made? Absolutely none. When he undertakes the task
of government, he does so, not with the intent of promoting the public weal, but
for the sake of filling his own pocket. His motto is still, "Pluck the fowl, but
take care she does not cry out". Corruption has spread through every portion and
every department of the Government. Almost all the ills of the country may be
traced to their source in tyranny, the ineptitude, and the improbity of those at
the helm of state . . . Can the Negro rule himself? Is he congenitally capable?
. . . Today, and as matters stand, he certainly cannot rule himself</span>.
</span><u1></u1
>
A
century later, we may be justified in reaching a similar
conclusion.<u1></u1
></span>
Having said this, I am not here to replicate simplistic conservative
arguments that blame Haitians for their predicament and prescribe solutions
based on democracy, liberalisation, education, investment, accountability,
transparency, and open markets. There is no doubt that Haitians, like
sub-Saharan Africans, are the architects of their own misfortunes; but it is
disingenuous to judge the diverse peoples of the world in terms of how well they
conform to a European standard. As I have argued here</span> and elsewhere</span>, not all the peoples of the world were
destined to be exactly like us. And, certainly, not all needed, or even desired,
to be exactly like us. <u1></u1
></span>
<u1>
</u1
>
<u1></u1
>Port
au Prince vs Soweto:Blackrulelooks thesame on both sides
of the Atlantic.</span><u1></u1
>
19th-century explorers of sub-Saharan Africa — the Haitians’
ancestral homeland — were shocked by the absence of civilisation in traditional
black African societies. The latter’s uncivilisation, however, was not the
abnormal result of failed states or the World Bank’s interest rates, because
these did not exist at the time: It was their normal condition. Uninfluenced by
European or Arabic cultures, these were prehistorical tribal societies, which
had never developed a written script, recorded history, used money, kept
calendars, maintained roads, or had any need for an administration or a code of
law. These societies still exist today in the African bush, and if they have
changed noticeably or at all in the past 50,000 years, they certainly have not
changed in our direction. Obviously, the traits that characterise us Europeans,
and which we value so highly, were not essential for survival in the sub-Saharan
bush; and, by extension, what Europeans find normal and natural, Black Africans
find abnormal and artificial. Ideologies of progress and modernity — defining
products of the liberal European mind — never occurred to the black man, even if
subsequently he found them instrumentally useful. It is not surprising,
therefore, that when a modern nation-state is placed under Black rule,
conditions rapidly deteriorate: At best, Blacks are able to simulate the outer
forms the European system, but never their substance.<u1></u1
></span>
With this in mind, it should be obvious that re</span>build</span>ing Haiti would be a waste of time. I would also call it a form of
imperialism. That the Western political establishment fails to recognise it and
act accordingly, even though deep down our politicians know it, owes more to
ideology than to ignorance of the facts. <u1></u1
></span>
The Left has a religious belief in progress. And, although they do
not realise it, their thinking is profoundly Eurocentric. Consequently, the Left
interprets history as a process in which humans — essentially Europeans with
exotic skin colours and minor differences in physiognomy — go from worse to
better, measured against values that are important to Europeans and no one else.
When progress fails to happen, the self-absorbed, navel-gazing Left blames
Europeans and sees it as the product of the imperfect implementation of Leftist
theories. Unfortunately, modern conservatives have been influenced the Left and
merely prefer a capitalistic and pragmatic — as opposed to a socialistic and
utopian — interpretation of the Left’s progress ideology. The result is a
campaign for ever more aid and development, fuelled by the belief that, given
enough money, education, and opportunity, the Third World (including even Haiti)
will eventually converge with Europe. For the Left, the daydream is universal
equality; for the conservatives, bigger markets for capitalist
enterprise.<u1></u1
></span>
<u1></u1
>
Voodoo: distinct African
flavour</span><u1></u1
>
Without a radical eugenics programme, however, the progress utopia
will remain a fanciful dream.<u1></u1
></span>
With regards to the death toll in Haiti, I of course blame the
Spanish and the French for purchasing slaves and shipping them to the Caribbean
to work on their plantations. Had they dispensed with this nefarious practice
and relied, instead, on their own muscle, Hispaniola would be today an immensely
rich island, well prepared for any natural disaster. Short of loopy schemes such
as shipping 9 million Haitians back to Africa, however, I propose that the best
that we can do at this stage is not to re-build, but to complete the demolition.
Subsistence farming, single-story mud dwellings of simple construction, no
motorised vehicles, no electricity, no money, no books, no manufactured tools,
and, most importantly, no firearms, trade, or Western intervention, is the model
to follow. Let Haitians lose all vestiges of European civilisation and
re-organise themselves in a manner harmonious with their endowments,
sensibilities, and ancestral culture. Let them find their own point of
equilibrium, even if it diverges greatly from ours. There is nothing wrong with voodoo</span> or a pre-industrial,
agricultural society, if that is what works for the people who live in
it.</span>
****Reference article... http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...Kurtagic-Haiti. html#AK
An article entitled "Haiti: 9/11-Type Opportunity for the Open Borders Crowd?"
They are dead serious about this.
On Sunday, hard on the heels of the Elliott Abrams demand that large quantities of Haitians be imported because of the earthquake, The Washington Post did it again.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/...i-911-for-the- open-borders-crowd/
LOL! [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img] This guy should've won the Pulitzer</span> for this...instead he gets canned from ESPN & villified by the cultural marxist, "mainstream" media vermin! [img]smileys/smiley7.gif[/img]
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusive...former-nba-pla yer-slams-haiti-relief-effort-tells-haitians-use-condom </span>
http://blacklistednews.com/news-7203-0-32-32--.html
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Traffickers targeting Haiti's children, human organs, PM says </h1><div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" ="cnn_stryathrtmp"><div ="cnnByline">By Tom Evans, CNN< ="text/">cnnAuthor = "By Tom Evans, CNN";</div><div ="cnn_strytmstmp">< ="text/">if(location.hostname.indexOf( 'edition.' ) > -1) {document.write('January 28, 2010 -- Updated 0321 GMT (1121 HKT)');} else {document.write('January 27, 2010 10:21 p.m. EST');}January 28, 2010 -- Updated 0321 GMT (1121 HKT)</div></div>