An article entitled "Obama administration wants Muslim women exempt from TSA searches."
http://cofcc.org/2010/11/obama-admin...muslim-women-e xempt-tsa-searches/Barack Obama’s Homeland Security Czar, Janet Napolitano, says that she is considering allowing Muslim women to “pat themselves down” at airports.
All while TSA goons grope everyone else, including children.
An article entitled "City of Charlotte, NC, to Whites: Drop Dead"
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2011/...-of-charlotte- nc-to-whites-drop-dead/In their zero-sum mentality, the overwhelming majority of blacks can enjoy freedom, prosperity, happiness and even life itself, only at the expense of white slavery, impoverishment, misery and death. Never mind that in reality, left to their own devices, with no whites to terrorize and slaughter (or to keep them in line), blacks terrorize and slaughter each other. They blame that on whites, too: “They makin’ us kill each other,” as I heard a young, malingering, malcontent black with an unearned promotion say of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Governor George Pataki to an equally racist black friend at Toys’R Us in 1998, when I moonlighted there as a security guard. Interrupted momentarily in his meditations by a greeting in passing from the white store director, who had given the speaker his unearned promotion, the speaker then added to his friend, “They go another one,” about his white benefactor.
America was founded based on the notion that my freedom does not preclude your freedom. “Civil rights” are the rights of all citizens. The so-called civil rights movement turned that idea upside down: “Civil rights,” according to Martin Luther King Jr. and his various black and red comrades and heirs, are privileges that accrue to blacks, based on the color of their skin, and which are thus denied whites for the same reason.
Thus, blacks have First Amendment rights; whites don’t. Whites must obey the law, but blacks are under no obligation to do so.
Note, however, that the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, aren’t “civil rights” in either sense, but “civil liberties,” i.e., limitations on the power of the federal government. Much of the Founding Fathers’ political genius is codified in the Bill of Rights.
Blacks who believe in MLK-style “civil rights,” which is to say, 90 percent or more of the blacks in this country, have no conception of civil liberties, which their belief in a racial zero sum game and their refusal to accept limits on federal power both preclude. (See also my theory of “The Paranoid, Black Supremacist, Jailhouse Philosophy of Law.”)
A piece entitled "Former Floridian Says Nullification Won’t Stop State, Local Corruption Blocking Immigration Reform"
http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_021311.htmBut despite the overwhelming sentiment from the public to restrict high density residential areas, developers are allowed and encouraged to build these affordable housing units with up to 24 or even 36 units per acre! It’s also a foregone conclusion that the affordable units will go to minorities, particularly illegal migrant workers. (I knew firsthand of several cases where Caucasians were denied their affordable housing status, despite being financially qualified. Well, so much for mathematical indifference).
Whites denied "affordable housing" because they are White. Though, some denies maybe merciful because the worker realized that sending Whites into certain areas is guaranteeing an attack, but most are undoubtedly, denied because they are White and de facto set asides are for nonwhites. It is interesting to note that shortly after the "Civil Rights" Act, the massive welfare state was created that was push with picture of poor Appalachian Whites, in reality, welfare has disproportionately gone to nonwhites. All sorts of special privileges were created for the nonwhites including rich nonwhites (Affirmative Action, set asides, etc.) but even poor Whites who qualify for welfare are routinely denied though a few get a little help from, most likely White, bureaucrats who follow the letter of the law. Poor Whites don't have the resources to fight against discrimination and the government is, often, the discriminator and very few White organization exist that can do much in that area.
It appears that the Welfare state is bankrupting The United States and the States of The United States, which is made up of a few White "elites" and their mass of nonwhites who occupy and loot the White people of these United States.
A question for you legal scholars out there, if the debts are made by The United States consisting of nonwhites and White "elites" do the common White people of these United States have any debt or are the White "elite" and nonwhites of The United States solely responsible for the debts made by the occupational government?
An article entitled "Ohio State, Miami Universities Accused of Racial Bias in Admissions"
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives...hio_state_miam .php
An article entitled "Special Privileges for Jewish Criminals"
Jews convicted of serious crimes routinely receive benefits denied to other prisoners —including serving their sentences in Israel! Of course, we know about rich Jews who have been caught for white collar crimes like insider trading like Ivan Boesky and Michael Milken, who served out their sentences in country club prisons, but what about Jews involved in more sinister crimes like drug trafficking and murders?http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=7246So, we’re sending this goon back to Israel to serve his sentence! Who knows how many millions he made selling Ecstasy? Who knows how many people over-dosed and died? Maybe he even played a role in selling these “bath salts” that are turning people into deranged cannibals. In the US, he’s a criminal. In Israel, he’s a rich big shot, who was successful at what he did. After he gets out, maybe he’ll run for a seat in the Knesset.
An article entitled "ACLU Michigan demands special treatment for black suspects"
http://topconservativenews.com/2013/...ack-criminals/ACLU Michigan is asking prosecutors to drop criminal charges against three black football players SPECIFICALLY because they are black. The ACLU says the trio should get special consideration because of their skin color.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote