-
It's not immigration it it's illegal, and illegal is only a semi-relevant factor.
The talk show hosts are full of righteous wrath against Obumr today because he mocked the concerns of pro-borderscitizens and sarcastically suggested that what we must really want is a moat with alligators in it, i.e. that we're impossible to pleasedespite all the wonderful stuff politicians have done to placate us already.
Obumris evil for saying such things, and they are right for blistering him..... but talking about the technical legality of TB- and VD-bearing anarchist revolutionaries coming here by the millionsto destroy everything is a bit ridiculous. It makes our side look totally sissy and dodges the real issue, which is whether these people belong here on their own merits, period,even if the politicianslegalize them with the stroke of a pen some fine day (which I predict they will).
The invadersdon't andwouldn't belong here, ever. Ergo the pundits should either call it an invasion, which is the only proper word for it, or drop the qualifiers and call it "immigration" only and call for a complete end to it. Even if all "immigration" were stopped, including the good and beneficial kind we'd be vastly better off.
What the pundits are really saying is not "we've got to stop illegal immigration" but "we've got to stop I'm not racist immigration". They, like most others in the media-government complex, are all looking for some way to frantically deflect accusations that because they want to restore demographic sanity they're "racist". Fiscal conservatives only talk about the economy, running like heck away from the fact that morals, religion and ethnicity are really what's killing Christendom. I'll never forget the nausea that came over me when this great hero and icon of American filthy-richness Ross Perot ran for president. We'd all heard his name all our lives and finally got a look at him. The little imp -- a Texan, no less! -- turned out to be aproduct of socialism and unconcerned for anything whatsoever except moolah and how tosound like he wanted us all to have more of the stuff.
Dummacrats and gliberals work openly to destroy whiteness (affirmative action, civil rights etc.) while "decent" people look the other way, talk about other things,and pepper their dialectics with furtive little "anti-racist"disclaimers. Rush Windblab almost single-handedly got commie plutocrats' NAFTA and GATT pushed through and has helped get several commie Pezidents elected who happened to be made of money.... while simply stonewalling the invasion subject for decades.The gew!
Maybe Rush figures he's the most conservative media figure because he's filthy rich himself. No doubt millions of dittoheads subconsciouly agree. A day or three ago when I last accidentally heard him while twisting the car radio dial, he was again stomping the few real conservatives who call his show over some non-money issueof great concern to real-worlders like us here in this room.
Conservatives say "illegal immigrants", Nationalists say invaders, and stomp the legality factor for the red herring/fig leaf it truly is. Let's do, every chance we get!
-
HAH! Somebody else dares to say it!
I'm not the only one anymore! Other commentators of this persuasion are mentioned, but I doubt any are as vehement or piercing about this particular verbal racket as yours truly.
http://amren.com/news/2012/01/what-a...t-immigration/
What Ann Coulter and the GOP Dare Not Say About Immigration
Selwyn Duke, Canada Free Press, January 4, 2012
........the reality is that in most respects illegal migration is not a separate and distinct problem.
It is an exacerbation of the problem.
Because demographically speaking, legal immigration and illegal migration are virtually identical. Most all illegal migrants hail from the Third World and Asia, and—owing to the Immigration Act of 1965 (Ted Kennedy’s handiwork)—85 percent of legal immigrants do as well.
In other words, yes, adding illegal migrants into the mix will help the statists take their California dreamin’ nationwide more quickly, but it will happen regardless unless we change our suicidal immigration model. So it really doesn’t matter if we “capitulate” on illegal migration or not, because we capitulated on the legalized version of it a long time ago. Now we’re only deciding whether Western civilization in the U.S. will get a death by 100 demographic cuts or 1000.
To be fair, Ann Coulter at least made passing mention of this reality when she slipped into her piece that “Massive legal and illegal immigration has already so changed the California electorate [emphasis added]….” Yet with the exception of Pat Buchanan, yours truly and a few others, this is an area where you’re more likely to hear the truth from leftist commentators—when they’re licking their chops over how successful they’ve been at importing their voters. Just consider, for instance, a 2011 NPR piece in which Mara Liasson cites a study by Ruy Teixeira at liberal feel tank Center for American Progress and writes.....
-
-
The press no longer will say "illegal alien"...they now say "immigrant".
They no longer say "amnesty" and they use "immigration reform".
So they rename things.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Reply With Quote