How about a file on nationalist/conservative doers of the past who get little or no press? Here's one I'll be nobody's heard of before -- Fulton Lewis -- please correct me if I'm wrong. This acct is liberaloid but what can you expect.
http://www.otr.com/lewis.html
I remember hearing him on radio each night as a child in NE NJ, as my mother was fixing dinner. Pretty sure my grandparents in VA heard him too. His stuff meant nothing to me at the time of course -- all that I knew was that it sounded monotonous and wasn't pretty music. Ah, if he were here today I'd shake his hand. Am thankful for Alan Stang and the other fighters of that period who are still alive -- esp. those. like Alan, who are still in the fray after paying some heavy dues through the years.
I remember both, although my recollection of Fulton Lewis Jr. is rather hazy.
Some time back in the 1970s, a group of us--Birchers--met Alan Stang at what used to be the Holiday Inn in Sewickley on Route 65.
As Itype this, I'm looking at a copy of "It's Very Simple--The True Story of Civil Rights" by Alan Stang.
Come to think of it, I've been in the fray myself for quite a long time!
P.
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
Another tireless fighter on our side was Dr. Revilo P. Oliver, who was with the JBS and also on the masthead of "American Opinion" until Robert Welch got cold feet--but that's a long story.
Several years ago when I was working with a colleague on the old EuroKnowledge discussion list, Kevin Alfred Strom sent us a copy of Dr. Oliver's book "The Jewish Strategy" in the preface to which he penned the following:
"In 1958 I still believed that there was a significant intellectual difference between the American bourgeoisie and the cattle that one sees peering between the slats of large trucks as they contentedly munch hay on their way to the abattoir."
I wonder what Dr. Oliver sould say now...
P.
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
Ah yes, Dr Oliver, the long-time (!) messiah of anti-Zion who was a very distinguished university professor as well. Miss his writings in Liberty Bell mag -- is it still publishing by the way? I still can't quite convince myself he was not the pseudonymous editor of Instauration mag, Wilmot Robertson, but they say W.R. is still with us.
Never heard it explained where he got that "Revilo" part.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revilo_Oliver
Revilo P. Oliver is recognized in certain circles after a search in the Annals of Improbable Research for having a name that functions as an effective palindrome. There are others known (such as Mark Kram) but Mr. Oliver is generally viewed as having the longest.
An article by him was denounced in print as a transparent fraud because the palindrome looked so suspicious.
Dr. Oliver explains:
"I was born near Corpus Christi, Texas, on 7th July, 1908...my first name, an obvious palindrome, has been the burden of the eldest son or only son for six generations."
I haven't seen or heard of Liberty Bell in many long years (a pity).
P.
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
Hello Gents. I love this conversation
I'm a relative newcomer to "our side", having had my head up butt during my20s and 30s raising hell and not paying attention. But now I'm an old coot, noticing that I better get to work help US before I kick bucket.
I proudly own a copy of "The Dispossessed Majority" authored by Wilmot Robertson. Gosh -- could it be that the author Wilmot was actually the famous Mr. Revilo, and I'm just now finding out? How cool. The book is a smash, one of my great trainers. Read the whole thing in two sittings.
Well, I know another unsung hero who could use a prayer or a hug. It's Dr. "H" who used to write articles for CONSERVATIVE REVIEW and, unfortunately, THE RESISTER, among many others. Shehad some JBS connections of which I know few details, but is undoubtedly a giant of "our side." Don W was well familiar with Dr. H's work.
I read a number of her books, the best one entitled "Why Do We Americans Submit to This?" Last I talked to Dr. H she was most despondent and complaining of a nagging health prob. I tried to invite her to join the ANU but No Soap! she had had enough of fighting the losing battle and wished me well. It's still unfortunate that the good Doc couldn't be brought back into the fight.
I agree! Let's develop this thread to do honor to the many unsung heroes of Our Side, always working in obscurity, frequently in danger of livelihood reduction, and always outmanned and outgunned. Before long some of us will be joining the clubEdited by: Realgeorge
To clear up acouple ofquestions in this thread, Liberty Bell stopped publishing some years ago. George Dietz was its publisher. Revilo Oliver was not the editor ofInstauration. And sadly, Instauration's actual editor, Wilmot Robertson passed away this summer at the age of 90.
Editor, The Nationalist Times, Voice of the Real America since 1985
The good thing about this baloney in France is that peope are starting to look at this "diversity" situation and their "leadership." Obviously the leadership in France refuses to do what they've got to do to stop this baloney. There are French nationalists, and this will bring more Frenchmen and women to the nationalist cause. The end result of all this will be the complete capitulation of the French govt. to whatever demands are eventually made by the Africans who are rioting.
Of course, the surrounding nations are watching the chaos as well. This all bodes well for nationalists, as long as it isn'talready too late.
Your scenario of Nationalists coming to greater prominence will be a welcome change from business as usual -- if the nationalists can give up fighting among themselves long enough to seize this opportunity.
We got hold of a big glossy guide to the "far right" by the ADL a few years ago, with a whole page devoted to each rightist force. It divulged that Wilmot's real name was Humphrey Ireland and I can't say I blame him for using a pseudonym. [img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img] This book,if I recall correctly,confirmed an earlier rumor that he lived inwestern NC. In the 1990s other amigos had alleged he'd been active in the cause since the 1920s. Any other details on the great man's life would be of keen interest. It was stated somewhere that Instauration was put together in one state, published in another, and mailed from a third -- I suppose for secrecy's sake? What are your thoughts in what would have happened if he had used his real name and a "real address", etc.? It was legal to publish his material back then, though I always assumed (perhaps wrongly) that they'd find some way to indict the "perpetrator" of such a publishing coup if he were caught.
I loved the Dispossessed Majority too. Found a castoff copy for 50c in a country library's back exit in Jew Jersey and it led me to me all my present associations and doings. Eventually I quit subscribing to Instauration, though, because it lost its zing and became increasingly a humanistic, anti-Christian tirade. When bailing out I told him it was becoming almost indistringuishable from the "Playboy philosophy." But while it lasted, it boosted my IQ something fierce. As when reading The DM You could feel yourself getting smarter as you partook of senior rightists' wit, wisdom, true history, etc. -- the dictionary ever open at your side. Ochlocracy -- hylotheistic -- palimpsest -- how many other educational (if not pre-eminently reusable) words entered myconsciousness through this route? I used to call Instauration "racism at the doctoral level" -- tongue partly in cheek of course.
Somewhere I still have a copy of one of the first issues of Inst -- an attractive smallnewspaper designed for distribution on campuses during the stupefied seventies. It had a useful collection of quotes from leading "minorityites" lambasting the white race as "the cancer of history" (Susan Sontag), &c. Early magazine issues turned out to be nowhere near as fun as the mag's golden age -- pseudo-intellectual stuff, really, as if grasping for respectability.
Honorees in the "Majority Renegade of the Year" department included Newt Gingrich, Lee Atwater, and George P. Shultz, who they aptly depicted as a political "Mr. Potato Head." I contributed scores of items to the anoynymous letters department called Safety Valve -- sometimes 5 or 6 in a single issue, for which he arbitrarily made up extra zip codes.
Wilmot's style and persona were, to me, indistinguishable from Revilo's. Wonder if they knew or influenced each other? To think of the latter being Revilo Oliver VI -- unusual for so many generations to keep a name (esp. outside of Va. [img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img]). Robertson's level of erudition and brilliance were almost unheard of for anyone outside of academe (granting that a measure of these things still exists in academe today). His bio notesmerely allow that he was "a native of Pennsylvania, from an old colonial family, and that he served as an officer in World War II as well as working in journalism, advertising, and small business."Edited by: nelson
Originally Posted by John T. Dilberger
Mr. Dilberger you are right the odds are great that the French
government will try to give concessions to the non-white
rioters. Of course, the powers that be in France, probably,
have been looking for an excuse to suppress the real French people even
more for a long time. The French already have a strong
nationalist movement with strong leaders even with the repressive laws
in France. Nationalism will grow amongst the French and as long as our
people exist it will never be too late.
That's exactly why they fill our countries with so many who have and deserve no power in them -- it multiples their own power. Will the rank and file French dummies call for band-aids (curfews, constant ID checking, disarmament etc.) or for real solutions -- expulsions and closed borders? I'm afraid to ask. Surely every self-respecting Frenchman would consider that raciste.
From what I can make out, Jean-Marie Le Pen's daughter seems to be running things on the Front National these days, and called for the Council of Ministers to declare a state of emergency last Friday.
This is the latest on the Front National website (in French only--English version does not cover this).
http://www.frontnational.com/accueil.php
Unfortunately, Chirac, who seems to have about as much courage as George Bush when confronted with problems like illegal immigration, is running things, not Le Pen. It is, however, a good opportunity for the Front National to make some political hay while the sun shines.
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
Whew, that's powerful (her use of the word instauration noted![img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img]) Is state of emergency the same as martial law? May I ask why she just doesn't propose that the government treat it as a war -- call out the military, and do whatever's necessary toward the insurrectionaries to restore order?
Maybeshe doesn't say this becauseshe doesn't want to get lynched? What, please, are y'all's ideas as to whatFrance's proper legal, effective response should be to this crisis.
When you throw the word "legal" in there as to what can be done, that creates a problem and drastically reduces the options. I know what I would do if I were running things, but that's another story.
Legally, it's the same problem in France, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium--even Switzerland and Austria. Spain, Portugal and Italy likewise, but probably not as severe as yet. I saw a posting by a Portuguese who mentioned that a Moroccan asked what the problem was, and was told very frankly, "we don't want you here!" Britain, as everyone knows, is in very bad shape also.
The kids are citizens in all cases, soyou can't legally deport them. France especially brought the problem on herself; they so desperately wanted to hold on to Algeria after WWII, they offered common citizenship, thinking the natives would stay put--they didn't.
From what I've picked up on the internet, Antwerp in Belgium has no-go areas; in the Netherlands, Amsterdam, and especially Rotterdam, same;Frankfurt/Main in Germany has its share, andin Berlin, I think it's the Köpenick district which looks like a town in Turkey. The same collection has invaded Linz, Austria, while in Sweden, the southern tip city of Malmo is actually experiencing an exodus of the Swedish population. In Switzerland, the PNOS (in English, Party of the Nationally Orientated Swiss)is fighting the invasion, but the leading Swiss newspaper (controlled by you-know-who) opposes their program--calls it pro-Nazi, as you might expect.
I guess I can only answer a question with a question--what can we legally and properly do with the hordes in California and the Southwest? There are, of course, a number of ex post facto solutions, but--well, see what Fred Reed has to say in his most recent article.
Morituri Salutamus.
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
We can declare the citizenship invalid. IT IS -- since the 1965 law (to use our case as an example) was invalid. I don't even have to read or research it to know this. Every damned thing government has been doing since 1865 is unlawful -- no joke. If necessary, we/they should throw legality to the winds. Whenyou're being raped, it's useless to attempt a solution through dialog or negotiation. Well, the politicians have "legalized" national rape, that's all.
I used the word "damned" judiciously. As I understand the Scriptures, everything pols do IS condemned from on high as an arrogation of god-like power that tramples the interests and well-being of all decent people.
No disagreement whatsoever, but it will take some strong will and determination to do whatneeds tobe done, and up to now, in general, our people just don't seem to have the necessary will and determination. Those who do are referred to by el Presidente as "vigilantes," or worse.
Probably every thinking person realized that the 1965 Immigration "Reform"(?) Bill was a disaster, brought about mostly by Lyndon "Wheeler-Dealer" Johnson and Ted "Chappaquiddick" Kennedy and the usual Babylonian subversives,but I'm afraid not too many people were thinking at the time.
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
Johnson -- Kennedy -- now those are EPITHETS [img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img]
Well, the Wheeler Dealer has gone to his reward, lo! these thirty-odd years, but Chappaquiddick Ted is still around to scatter pearls from his treasure house of wisdom.
Could you imagine a Ted Kennedy administration--like Dianne Feinstein as our first Vice-Presidentess,perhaps Charles Schumer as Secretary of State, Barney Frank as Secretary of Defense, Barbara Boxer as Attorney General, and possibly Jerrold Nadler as Secretary of the Interior? A good choice for Director of Homeland Security would be Abe Foxman. As a concession to bipartisanship and as an accommodation to the feminists, Condoleeza Rice could be appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Israel would become the 51st state, with the national capitol moved to Tel-Aviv...and so on. Use your imagination, man!
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
Well, Israel moved from 1st position to 51st . . . that would make it all worth the price of admission! [img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img]
Getting back to the original intent of nationalist/conservative doers of the past, how about Charles Augustus Lindbergh?
"Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. The greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government."
Ever since that fateful speech of September 11, 1941, "Lindy" has been effectively put in the deep freeze, which pretty much proves his assertion of who controls "our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government" and, since that day, television as well.
The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote