An article entitled "America’s left-wing newspapers are “fastest shrinking industry”"
http://cofcc.org/2012/03/americas-le...king-industry/
ANUNews
http://theintelhub.com/2012/03/30/cn...edia-explodes/
The page includes this intriguing, possibly valid link:
http://gibiru.com/
It's great to see the audience for the dinosaur corporate media outlets continue to shrink, following what's been happening with urban newspapers for quite a while now, but the question is, where are those viewers going? Just because CNN is losing viewers doesn't mean that those viewers are now reading, say, ANU News. In other words the decline of the old media doesn't necessarily mean the new media is rising at an equivalent rate; most people use the internet for sports, porn, and entertainment fluff. But maybe I am feeling a little too pessimistic today. . .
Editor, The Nationalist Times, Voice of the Real America since 1985
Don't despair, keep positive! The mainstream media is losing audience which means that not as many people are falling for their propaganda. Only a tiny number may go to the ANU News and a small number to other White Nationalist Web Sites, but change is not a numbers game but quality not quantity. Though, the number of all the people going to the various White Nationalist web sites would likely be staggering. Any White nationalist group that gets too large or too strong is targeted by "the powers that be" but many small groups can be stronger then a single large group and almost impossible to destroy.
The primary focus of White nationalist leadership should be cooperation between the groups. Each group is a part of a whole and does their part rather political, news, social, religious or whatever and each part is important to the whole.
The lost of mainstream media audience means that the propaganda isn't being believed. propaganda works best in a vacuum where people aren't exposed to the problems. A White student in school with nonwhites may spout the propaganda that all races are the same but will see the truth everyday. The government can say the economy is booming or recovering but when many of a person's friends and family and maybe even them are unemployed and cost are going up, it is hard for them to believe the lies. Right now, the nationalist are recruiting and training the nationalist leadership who will be needed when the time to replace "the powers that be" comes.
No one knows when the bread and circuses will stop but stop it will and then the time of change will be at hand. Right now, "the powers that be" are using every trick, every reserve that could be used in the future for recovery and helping the common people, to keep themselves in power just a little long. It could fall apart tomorrow or a hundred years from now, no one can tell, but the end will come like all things on this Earth and when it does it will be time for the nationalist to rise.
What I'm wondering is where we'll all be without the "mainstream" media, since we're getting so much of our material from it.
Last edited by Nelson4; 04-27-2012 at 06:35 AM.
The mainstream media is a good source for now because the powers that be can't challenge their own but they have to be sifted through to find the truth, many stories and little useful information, but already little alternative news web sites and blogs where people go out on their own get stories even get police reports to report on the news. There are even some fairly large alternative news sites that even do their own investigated reporting.
The problem with the small sites is they are scattered and that where sites like the ANU news will come into their own. Once enough local reporter is show to be reliable, the ANU News and similar sites could start acting like a wire service bring the news together from many areas. Of course, this would require many volunteers.
When a niche, like reporting the truth, isn't being filled people will popup to fill that niche and that is what the alternative media is doing and unless brutal repressed they will replace the mainstream media.
An article entitled "Newspapers wonder why they’re dying?"
http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/...-theyre-dying/Newspaper subscription rates and ad revenue continue to plunge, with no end in sight. And how do newspapers respond? Do they seek to please the vast majority of their readers, which is white people, and look out for their interests? No, they do the exact opposite. They kowtow to non-whites in their editorials and commentary, downplay or refuse to even mention race in stories about crime and other problems in their news reporting, while constantly lecturing white people on their sins of “racism” and “xenophobia”.
I remember reading a column once that was entitled, “Ignorance Is Costlier Than Immigrants.” You can imagine where it went from there. To no surprise, however, almost all of the reader comments took issue with the piece and lined up on our side of the argument.
Ignorance is costly? Hardly. It’s only 75 cents a day, $2.00 on Sundays.
An article entitled "New Orleans Times-Picayune ending daily publication"
As alternative mainstream media venues like TPC continue to grow, establishment rags like the Times-Picayune will continue to die on the vine.http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/...y-publication/Lord, just let me live long enough to see the daily paper in Memphis follow the Times-Picayune out the door!
It’s no wonder, of course, why newspapers are dying. White folks are the only people who read and everything in the paper is anti-White.
Millions of European Americans are looking for more objective sources of information. We’re doing our part on the radio to provide it.
An article entitled "CNN’s Prime Time Show a “Ratings Dumpster”"
Perhaps a big problem for her is that Americans are getting sick of whiny liberal lectures and news censorship instead of news reporting. CNN still doesn’t show any respect for the TEA party movement despite Rand Paul’s victory in Kentucky. Instead, the liberal media has been scrounging for every off hand remark by Rand Paul that they hope they can use against him.
Americans don’t want to watch a TV network that they view as “the enemy”. Ever since Lou Dobbs left CNN, it’s been a wasteland of liberalism or mindless fluff stories by Larry King, who couldn’t ask a hardball question if his life depended on it.http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=7583Americans want real stories on topics that they consider important. The liberal media censorship of all questions about Obama’s citizenship does not sit well with millions of Americas. If someone did a prime time documentary on Obama’s citizenship (which wasn’t a liberal cover-up job), it would likely bring in at least 10 million viewers. When you only produce liberal state-approved pablum, you can expect to be in last place.
The fact remains undeniable that the most popular American media personalities are the White and conservative ones, Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck on TV and Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity on talk radio. Liberalism does not and never has had any major support outside the affluent and wealthy Anglo-Jewish intellectual and governmental classes.
White Americans are growing more radical every day. They want positive coverage of the TEA Party movement, not condescending sneers from arrogant liberals.
An article entitled "Burning Yachts and Burning Money"
http://takimag.com/article/burning_y..._bruce_cochran
An article entitled "Post-Apocalypto"
http://takimag.com/article/post_apoc...e_sailer/printWell, who else is writing about it? A glance at its Rotten Tomatoes page shows that Get the Gringo has not been reviewed by any “Top Critics” outside of the two trade papers.
In other words, Gibson has been more or less blacklisted by the media.
Sounds like Gibson may have been Whitelisted. Face it any White who does not fall down and worship the Jews and political correctness or just are too talent Whites is put on a list that we could call a "Whitelist" so the politically correct know not to do business with them. We talk about the alternative media but that could be said to be the alternative movie makers as well. Mel Gibson is the big fish as an outcast from Hollywood but many others exist too.
Many small film makers seem to include a lot of Whites, while the ones that managed to break into Hollywood are usually heavily Jewish. Some of these have great acting, writing, directing, makeup, special effects and so on but seldom even two of those catalogues are great in the same movie. The talent just needs to be brought together. These small time movie makers are real entrepreneur, but they don't get millions from the government only threats and red tape. There are countless businesses in all fields like them that just await the fall of the old Jew World Order to shine.
An article entitled "The Dying Liberal Media Beast"
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=10891The fluff magazines will probably last for a while, but Time magazine itself will probably disappear within a year or two. And good riddance. We get one less dose of poisonous liberal drivel every week.
The New York Times may go extinct soon as well. Liberal magazines and rags have been failing one-by-one. Why pay for some anti-White liberal editorials, when you can go online and read conservative and pro-White articles for free?
An article entitled "How the Internet is Undermining the Jewish Supremacist Media Stranglehold"
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=39399As the CJN statement said, the Internet has allowed a much greater—and easier—access to news and opinion. No longer do a small handful of Jewish Supremacists have the ability to dictate what is news, how it is reported and which facts to suppress.
There can be little doubt that the future belongs to free and independent media sources, such as Dr. Duke’s davidduke.com which is, according to the Alexa web tanking service, already the 172,466 most popular website in the world.
The decline in the power of the traditional media moguls is good news for freedom-loving people everywhere in the world—and bad news for the Jewish Supremacists, whose era of oppression and world-wide censorship is at least coming to an end.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote