Woho! "a monumental new book entitled Colonization after Emancipation: Lincoln and the Movement for Black Resettlement, by Phillip W. Magness of American University and Sebastian N. Page of Oxford University. Based on newly-rediscovered documents in the American and British National Archives, including letters signed by Lincoln himself, these researchers have established that Lincoln continued to pursue colonization right up to the days before his assassination, when he discussed plans with General Benjamin Butler to deport the freed slaves."
<H1 align=center>Another Big Lincoln Lie Exposed</H1>
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
An article entitled "Censored History: Abraham Lincoln was almost murdered by black men at age 19."
http://cofcc.org/2011/05/censored-hi...ham-lincoln-wa s-almost-murdered-by-black-men-at-age-19/At the age of 19, Abraham Lincoln was nearly killed by a wolfpack of Negro thugs along the Mississippi River.
In 2000, Lerone Bennett Jr. the former and long time editor of the afrocentric magazine Ebony published the historical revisionist book Forced into Glory: Abraham Lincoln's White Dream.
Any literary work that deconstructs the tired and stale "Lincoln the Redeemer" shibboleth marketed by the usual suspect "court historians" is welcomed.
Lincoln's words, writings and beliefs have been all too often downplayed by "court historians" who strive in their "historical context" duty to portray Lincoln as the "Great Emancipator."
Where Mr. Bennett finds fault with Lincoln's views on race, I tend to agree with Lincoln.
However, where Mr. Bennett finds fault with the "court historians" that the War Between the States was foremost over slavery, I agree with his contention; as Lincoln's view that the Union must be preserved was foremost in importance.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bennett's mainly correct heterodox views of Lincoln's war aims seems to drift into incoherence with the statement, "If Lincoln had his way, Martin Luther King Jr., Oprah Winfrey, Jesse Jackson, and even Clarence Thomas would have been born into slavery..."
Ms. Winfrey was born in 1954. As Ron Paul stated correctly on Meet the Press in 2007 about Lincoln and the "American Civil War" http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=jbOE4Ip7In0 ...to suggest that in 1954 she would have been born a slave and white Americans would still be living as they did in 1860 is ridiculous.
Slavery was slowly, indeed too slow, coming to an end in America as it did throughout Europe.
Article: An African-American Icon Speaks Truth to the Lincoln Cult - LewRockwell.com - January 12, 2008
Poor pitiful intelLECtuals -- they have nothing to do all day but extrapolate what would have been if what could have been should have been.
Our stock answer on slavery and the Un-Civil War can be simply to point out that slavery was phased out peacefully everywhere else, and if that fails, I tell them "please look at me and tell me you feel freeing the American slaves was worth 650,000 lives." They can't. NO idea could be worth such a price, and indeed it would have been a waste if ten lives had been lost on that one, because CONFLICT WAS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY.
In other words, I'm agreeing with Gard as usual.
"I supported President Lincoln. I believed his war policy would be the only way to save the country, but I see my mistake. I visited Washington a few weeks ago and I saw the corruption of the present Administration and so long as Abraham Lincoln and his Cabinet are in power, so long will the war continue, and for what? For the preservation of the Constitution of the Union? No! But for the sake of politicians and governmental contractors."
-- J. P. Morgan (April 17, 1837 - March 31, 1913), American financier and banker
An article entitled "Shattering the Icon of Abraham Lincoln"
http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/...raham-lincoln/As we continue our coverage of Confederate History Month 2012, we revisit an extraordinary paper written by my good friend and frequent on-air guest, Sam Dickson.
Even in the Christian Schools these days itís amazing to see the amount of worshipful Lincoln-Douglass-Tubman propaganda.
Dickson helps us set the record straight on Lincoln.
Too bad the South didn't win.
In the 1950's the common White Southerners were betrayed by many of the Southern "elite". That same betrayal would have happened in some manner. Blacks might not have been as big of a problem but Mestizos and Asians likely would have been while election would be just as rigged by the Jews as U.S. election are.
The CSA could have turned into a Zionist enforcer far worst than the USA. With the South's defeat, the Southern people gained a knowledge of the Jews and a defeat can give a people a strength far greater than any victory can give. Both the Germans and the Russians are stronger than they would be without their defeats. Notice how Russian, after tossing off, partly, for now, the Jewish yolk, is becoming the leader of the free world, which they will firmly be when they deal with their Jews, and the Germans will in time rise-up and create a forth Reich far more Glorious than the Third world have have been.
Defeat is not the end, but the beginning of a stronger nation!
More places give us more places to go. You see the same problem with businesses now, the small ones are owned by the bigger ones. Not many choices. It is getting to be that way in the world, too.
How is Germany going to rise up, when you cannot even mention the Hollow-cost over there? Germany has not moved on, it is in shackles and kept down that way.
The only way Germany can rise up is the only way the US can be saved, and that is, if people stop swallowing the daily dose of propaganda, about how their lives should be, how they should live, what the truth is, and what the country should be like.
If people just learn history, no one has to tell them what the deal is. They can see it just by looking around. Unfortunately, most learn the corrupt version of history.
After Lincoln's war of aggression, he was assassinated likely by the very Jews who helped and supported him that is how they operate. Many suspect that if Huey Long had lived he would have set back Jewish plans by two hundred years that is why they couldn't let him live.
Germany like the CSA is occupied and oppressed, but when a people are occupied and oppressed they lay low and wait. Russia was firmly occupied by the communist (read 'Jews") than they weren't. That is the way it goes the occupier believes they are in total control and the people are broken and when they let down their guard. A lesson of history but "elite" never learn.
Are you, doublehelix, from the South?
But I was taught that the "Civil War", the War Between the States, was not fought over slavery.
I never cared for Lincoln since he sent over 600K men to their graves, and countless others were maimed, injured, etc.
That war should not ever have been fought. Had Lincoln recognized the South's right to secede, then one shot from a
hothead in SC wouldn't have made history.
An article entitled "Private enterprise & Lincolnís war"
http://southernnationalist.com/blog/...-lincolns-war/The economic interests of the industrial and financial elites of the Northeast had a great deal of influence on the events which brought war to the South in the 1860s and led to half a million deaths. John V Denson, an Alabama attorney, author and adjunct scholar at the Ludwig von Mises Institute, writes about this influence on pages 176-177 of his book A Century of War: Lincoln, Wilson, and Roosevelt while contrasting private enterprise with free enterprise.