LIBERALS & MINORITIES WHO BREAK THE MOLD

[Nelson]

per anu.org:


http://www.mehrnews.ir/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=566694



<TABLE id=tblNews cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=2 width="100%">
<T>
<TR id=trNewsTitle>
<TD colSpan=2>Zionists using Holocaust to silence people: chief rabbi</TD></TR>
<TR id=trNewsLead>
<TD colSpan=2>TEHRAN, Oct. 10 (MNA) -- Chief Rabbi of the Orthodox Jewish Community in Austria, Moishe Arye Friedman, believes that the “Zionist regime is using the Holocaust concept as a tool and weapon to silence people.”</TD></TR>
<TR id=trNews>
<TD colSpan=2>
In an interview with the Mehr News Agency here on Saturday, October 6, Friedman said “the root of the world’s problems is the existence of the Zionist regime.”<?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" />

The chief rabbi was in Iran on an invitation from the Islamic Republic.

Following is an excerpt of the interview:

Q: Would you please explain about your community’s activities?

A: We are in a religious community, and our activities are actually concentrated mainly and truly on exercising the religion only, by being the followers of Prophet Moses. We are actually forbidden from having any activities of political nature. But also similar to the Islamic Republic of Iran, our activities are for human rights, for world peace, resulting from a religious perspective.

Q: Don’t you think that Israel’s behavior in the Middles East, especially its treatment of the Muslims in the occupied territories, would pose threats to Jews in other countries?

A: When we talk about Israel, the catastrophe of Zionism is not only in their state, it is the regime. The Zionist regime is not concentrated only on the so called Israel, the Zionist regime is actually in the most of the world. To march to Jerusalem, we mean of course to physically be in Jerusalem, we have to wipe off the Zionist regime............. </TD></TR></T></TABLE>

[Nelson]

I hate to give Ann Coulter credit for anything, but she does a pretty decent job of smashing Judaism and a chosenite mama's boy talk show host here.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6nqJ2hK9D4&amp;NR=1


[I later had to search this show up again—the original file was removed. If it occurs again, search COULTER JEWS at Youtube. Wow, she even calls him a liar—must have accidentally swallowed truth serum!]


Donny boy probably got straight A's at Talmud school in word- and thought-morphing, guilt-tripping, and in administering the dialectical half-nelson that would have flattened any other show guest with shame and opprobrium...... but oh, if Donny's wrestling teachers there saw him take this tumble, they'd revoke his diploma. Is he still on the air, or did they replace him with somebody much more mouthy and belligerent? I don't know, I don't own a TV.


Notice that when the topic turns to what should be done with Jews, if it doesn't get resolved philo-semitically, it's the last topic heard—especially if the host "just happens to be Jewish" and is therefore entitled to play the "I'm personally offended" card.


When a Jew (excuse me, a member of the Jewish community) is offended, the world—like the TV show—is supposed to stop!


LATER. Time magazine has made the above NONtroversy a cover story, but remember where you heard it first!


http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-coulter13oct 13,0,5298383.story?coll=la-home-center


Anti-semitic remark puts Ann Coulter back in the hot seat


http://ihr.org/Edited by: Nelson

[Nelson]

It seems safe to class this gentleman as a liberal since he won the igNobel Prize and is an evolutioneer. Wait a minute, he's flinging evolution in their face as grounds for innate racial inequalities!


Here's to him for his moral courage!


http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_te...cle3067222.ece

Fury at DNA pioneer's theory: Africans are less intelligent than Westerners
Celebrated scientist attacked for race comments: "All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really"
By Cahal Milmo
Published:Â17 October 2007

One of the world's most eminent scientists was embroiled in an extraordinary row last night after he claimed that black people were less intelligent than white people and the idea that "equal powers of reason" were shared across racial groups was a delusion.
James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in the unravelling of DNA who now runs one of America's leading scientific research institutions, drew widespread condemnation for comments he made ahead of his arrival in Britain today for a speaking tour at venues including the Science Museum in London.
The 79-year-old geneticist reopened the explosive debate about race and science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies towards African countries were wrongly based on an assumption that black people were as clever as their white counterparts when "testing" suggested the contrary. He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade.
The newly formed Equality and Human Rights Commission, successor to the Commission for Racial Equality, said it was studying Dr Watson's remarks " in full". Dr Watson told The Sunday Times that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testiing says not really". He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true".
His views are also reflected in a book published next week, in which he writes: "There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so".............
Edited by: Nelson

[Nelson3]

Actor Jon Voight is pitifully confused. He early helped to wreck morality by starring in the totally decadent Midnight Cowboy movie (1969), but has now got religion, i.e. extreme Judaism.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pPVQxWNtUQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf0YzPnEcDg

Yet he talks like one of us sometimes -- thank God for that:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOi4D6GLYak&amp;NR=1


Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

Onetime svengali to president Slick, Dick Morris "has emerged as a harsh critic of the Clintons and has written several books that criticize them, including Rewriting History, a rebuttal to Senator Hillary Clinton's Living History. Morris said that he would leave the United States if Hillary Clinton were elected president in 2008.[4]" (Wikipedia).

Apparently he's still a full-fledged commie Clintonista, but anytime ther's strife within the System, especially if Hillary! is the loser, we can use it! How very pregnant with meaning that Morris's bio note at bottom says he was once adviser to iconic GOP race truckler Trent Lott......

Dig this -- per Drudge:

http://thehill.com/dick-morris/the-i...shrinking-clin tons-2009-05-26.html
The Incredible Shrinking Clintons<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">By Dick Morris<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">Asked why he was naming some of his rivals to top administration jobs, President Lyndon B. Johnson said it best: “I’d rather have them inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in.” President Obama seems to echo Johnson’s management style in his handling of Bill and Hillary Clinton. By bringing them into his inner circle, he has marginalized them both and sharply reduced their freedom of action.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">It may appear odd to describe a secretary of State as marginalized, but Obama has surrounded Hillary with his people and carved up her jurisdiction geographically. Former Sen. George Mitchell (D-Maine) is in charge of Arab-Israeli relations. Dennis Ross has Iran. Former U.N. Ambassador Dick Holbrooke has Pakistan and Afghanistan. And Hillary has to share her foreign policy role on the National Security Council (NSC) with Vice President Biden, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, CIA chief Leon Panetta, and NSC staffer Samantha Powers (who once called Hillary a “monster”).<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">With peers who are competitors and subordinates who can deal directly with the president, Hillary is reduced to announcing foreign aid packages for Pakistan while Holbrooke does the heavy lifting.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">Part of Hillary’s problem is the institutional shrinking of the State Department. During the Bush years, while war raged, the Defense Department became more relevant to the conduct of foreign policy. And, under Obama, the financial crisis has propelled the Treasury into the forefront. State, with its emphasis on traditional diplomacy, has been forced to take a back seat. Even though Obama appointed Hillary, he clearly has not been willing to make her a co-president and confines her to the diminished role of her department.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">For his part, Bill Clinton has been asked to be a special envoy to Haiti. Yes, Haiti. Obama’s predecessor asked the former president to orchestrate the response to the Asian tsunami and then to Hurricane Katrina. Obama gives him Haiti.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">Meanwhile, both Clintons are effectively muzzled and cannot criticize Obama even as he reverses President Clinton’s free market proclivities and budget balancing discipline. Hillary, the supposed friend of Israel, must sit by quietly and watch Iran get the bomb while trying all the while to stop Israel from preventing it.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">Bill can’t even make money. Denied the ability to accept speeches from foreign governments or their organs and fenced out of continuing his profitable relationship with the Emir of Dubai, he and his wife must accept the loss of the $13 million they spent on her campaign and sit by passively, unable to earn the money to replace it.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">Just as Lincoln buried his rivals Seward, Chase and Stanton in the Cabinet and then on the Supreme Court, and Wilson buried Bryan at the State Department, so Obama has hidden his predecessor and his rival in plain sight at the upper reaches of the government.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">How long will Hillary subject herself to this discipline? Likely as long as Obama is popular. Should his ratings fade, she might move away from the president and could even consider a primary contest against him in 2012. But while he is on top of his game, she’ll stay loyal.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">But she is shrinking by the day. Once Obama’s equal — and before that his superior — she now looks tiny compared to the president. She doesn’t look like a president in waiting; she’s more like a senior staff member hoping to rise in the bureaucracy. No longer at the head of a movement or the symbol of rising women all over the world, she has faded into the State Department woodwork. She is much less visible than her predecessors Henry Kissinger, George Schultz, James Baker, Madeleine Albright or Condi Rice. She is even less in the public eye than was Al Haig during his one-year tenure. One has to go back to the likes of Warren Christopher or William Rogers to find a secretary of State as far down the totem poll. This diminished status has got to grate on her and on him. But they are trapped in Obama’s web and cannot easily escape.<BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)"><BR style="COLOR: rgb(102,0,0)">Morris, a former adviser to Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and President Bill Clinton, is the author of Outrage. To get all of Dick Morris’s and Eileen McGann’s columns for free by e-mail or to order a signed copy of their new best-selling book, Fleeced, go to dickmorris.com.

Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

Now this is a first -- a black doctor (#1) who's concerned and articulate about bedrock reality (#2). I'm willing to give credit where credit is due anytime, but there is an almost total vacuum of black personages thinking outside the box this way.

The real killer</font>




The numbers don't lie
</font>
http://www.therealfoodchannel.com/vi...eal_killer.htm l

He even evokes Southern culture in a non epileptic, non-knee-jerk vein. Good!

[Nelson3]

Every time you turn around, more good is being alleged of Cynthia McKinney. I suspect she wavers between the real world she now clearly perceives and the black-supremacist mania that got her her national profile.

http://adamholland.blogspot.com/2009...a-mckinney-and -far-right-red.html
<h3>Cynthia McKinney and the far-right. The red-brown convergence now includes the Greens.</h3>I see via Barnes Review (3-4/09) that Gerard Menuhin, son of the late violinist Yehudi, is a crusader for political incorrectness -- TBR published an interview he did with Sylvia Stolz in prison and gives riveting details on his own saga.
[img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]

Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

Move over, James Manning.

This is rich!!!</span> Per the incomparable www.spiritwaterblood.com and the exciting Western Voices World News site:

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=7618

You've always heard that blax from other countries had nothing but scorn for ameriKan reggins -- case in point.

Later. </font>

Whoa -- a major "diversity" exposé breaks through Mother Jones mag????



Look for pigs to start flying soon! [img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Alyssa Katz’ Our Lot: A Liberal Perspective On How Political Pressure To Boost Minority Homeownership Helped Blow Up The Economy.</h1>By Steve Sailer
Our Lot: How Real Estate Came to Own Us

by Alyssa Katz, [<i style=""><a href="mailto:aak207@nyu.edu" target="_blank">Email
her</a>[/i]] a liberal journalist and<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/faculty/katz.html" target="_blank">
NYU journalism professor </a>who writes for
Mother Jones, is
the best book yet on how the sacred cause of
<b style="">“diversity”[/b]
merged with pedal-to-the-metal capitalism to bring us the
Great
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=site%3Avdare.com+%22mortgage+me ltdown%22&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi =" target="_blank">
Mortgage Meltdown</a>. </span>

The book
hasn’t garnered the attention it deserves—probably because
it makes clear the
bipartisan
responsibility of both
<a href="http://vdare.com/Sailer/080928_rove.htm" target="_blank">her
opponents on the Right </a>and
<a href="http://vdare.com/Sailer/090301_mortgage_meltdown.htm" target="_blank">
her friends on the Left</a></span>.</span>..................</span>


Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

First it was the founder of the Weather Channel suing Al Bore for his massive global warming fraud. Now it's a former head of Greenpeace denouncing the warmists in telling of the radical change he saw come over his organization as the warming cult came to fruition!

I used to support Greenpeace..... till I realized they were making the US sound like more of a nuke threat than the USSR. Even with my then-crude understanding of politics, I gagged.

This is a historic occasion of sorts. Brasscheck itself is far left when it comes to race etc., but dares to call warming-mania exactly what it is, "far-left-of-sanity</font>".

From: Brasscheck TV &lt;news@brasschecktv.com&gt;
Subject: Brasscheck TV: How the global warming myth was created

Nelson

How do myths like "climate change by carbon" come into being?

Not by accident.

In the case of the current global warming, the scam has been brewing for over 30 years.

Strange alliances here...pro nuclear/anti-labor control freaks and far-left-of-sanity nut jobs are the drivers.

But who's paying the bill?

"Selling" climate-change-by-carbon is a very expensive proposition.

Video:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/751.html

- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

Follow us at: http://twitter.com/brasschecktv

==============================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?zAxs7Owct...MtEa0rJwMrGzMn A==
</font>
The page itself:
<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">How to manufacture a myth</font><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">I'm not a fan of coal or gasoline.



They're dirty (outright toxic in the case of gasoline), their use gives
excessive power to a handful of anti-democratic organizations, and they
aren't even as necessary as we've been taught they are (the original
cars were powered by easy-to-produce and renewable alcohol and ran just
fine.)



That being said, if we're going to do something about being dependent on fossil fuels, how about an honest argument?



As this video shows, "climate change by carbon" is a carefully
constructed myth, launched in the UK and championed by a weird alliance
of pro-nuclear/anti-labor forces and far-left-of-sanity zealots.



What's the real agenda?



Greater centralization, more taxation (theft by government), and
further erosion of the sovereignty of individuals and local
communities.
</font></font>






Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

Proud Indian commentator David Yeagley reaches new PC-busting heights with an article, The Hated White Race</span>, in the new Citizens Informer. For some reason I can't find it anywhere in his site, but Stromfront has it:

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/site...php/t-661352.h tml
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=661352

His site indicates he's got a big neocon streak but is sometimes a grade B-plus spokesman on race, diversity and president "Barry".

http://www.badeagle.com/category/bad-eagle-journal/
http://www.badeagle.com/2010/01/07/b...-to-the-right- obamas-braggadocio/


Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

Man! Rothbard came perilously close to the big H here -- and just 25 years after it never happened!


http://mises.org/story/2592


Revisionism for Our Time


Whoa -- OMG -- This from the same current pile of goodies at IHR.ORG. Man, this is living! Yes, Stone is a Tribesman.[img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]


I'm telling you, it won't be long now till the whole thing punctures and blows away.


Jewish Group Condemns Oliver Stone's Remark That Hitler is a Scapegoat
Ynet News (Israel)

The Simon Wiesenthal Center rebuked remarks made by director Oliver Stone during a press conference for his new history documentary. Stone said, "Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and it's been used cheaply. He's the product of a series of actions. It's cause and effect." The director is using the series to expose what he calls lies and biases behind the conventional interpretation of American history and that would include reexamining WWII history and putting Hitler "into context." "To talk about 'placing Adolf Hitler in context' is like placing cancer in context, instead of recognizing cancer for what it really is - a horrible disease, just as we must recognize Hitler as the ultimate expression of evil," said Rabbi Marvin Hier ...



Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

I rate Gore a liberal despite his strong nationalist streaks for reasons that should be obvious.

Makes his remarks that much more meaningful here. Brasschecktv.com's flick for the day:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXDze...;feature=playe r_embedded
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Gore Vidal - American Empire</h1>Remember, it is NOT PERMITTED to make a video pastiche or broadside that doesn't have a "broken record" rock tattoo going all the way through. Thank you, Grand Funk Railroad, Iron Butterfly, et al, for reducing music to the same riff banged out 4, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, or 512 times in a row for no apparent reason.


Edited by: Nelson3

[DixieDestroyer]

Man! Rothbard came perilously close to the big H here -- and just 25 years after it never happened!


http://mises.org/story/2592


Revisionism for Our Time</font>


Whoa -- OMG -- This from the same current pile of goodies at IHR.ORG. Man, this is living! Yes, Stone is a Tribesman.[img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]


I'm telling you, it won't be long now till the whole thing punctures and blows away.


Jewish Group Condemns Oliver Stone's Remark That Hitler is a Scapegoat</font>
Ynet News (Israel)

The Simon Wiesenthal Center rebuked remarks made by director Oliver Stone during a press conference for his new history documentary. Stone said, "Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and it's been used cheaply. He's the product of a series of actions. It's cause and effect." The director is using the series to expose what he calls lies and biases behind the conventional interpretation of American history and that would include reexamining WWII history and putting Hitler "into context." "To talk about 'placing Adolf Hitler in context' is like placing cancer in context, instead of recognizing cancer for what it really is - a horrible disease, just as we must recognize Hitler as the ultimate expression of evil," said Rabbi Marvin Hier ... </font></font>

Stone's right regarding Hitler being a scapegoat (initially enabled by the PTB) and that JFK being "neutralized" was covered up. I figured the Zionists would start clamoring about his (truthful) statements.

[Nelson3]

It's everywhere -- politically-incorrect truth!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5lwAihYubc
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="watch-line-title">Tony Brown discusses the Illuminati
</span></h1>I remember watching Tony's Brown Journal[img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img] in my youth and almost throwing up at the PC of it -- but wow, TB is really laying it on the line! The following goes right along with what DD said -- "Communism isn't a celebration of the Illuminati; communism is a manufactured phony concept of the Illuminati. So the Illuminati plays both sides</span>!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMLUfXgktQ4
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="watch-line-title">Tony Brown's
Journal with Gary Null Part 1 </span></h1>This is for the documentary America: Wake Up Or Waco, which may have been produced by the same man as 911 Unanswered Question, the magnum opus in the genre.

Y'all know of course about the full screen option?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...46819970816501 #



Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

Since liberals dominate green thinking and love to slap labels on non-liberals, I'm going to provisionally class this site as liberal. The tone and focus of the article is garbled as several different investigators play catch with the hot potato called "how much do we really, really want commie gews running everything" -- and try not to answer it with a too-loud "NO".

Who cares, as long as liberals are starting to count gews? HA HA HA, yum yum yum </span>it's delicious like chicken zoup!

http://greenpolitics.healthwealthand...k/news-propaga nda/propaganda/jews-invented-hollywood.-2.html

No author showing, no time to read the whole thing, but here's the bizarre coda of the piece:

"When Marlon Brando held a news conference at the Museum of Tolerance (MOT, a
state-funded Holocaust museum operated by Orthodox rabbis) to apologize for his
comments about Jews on the Larry King Show, William Cash leaped on stage and
started babbling about his desire to repent for his article. Cash was led away
by security guards. Later, Cash was told by Jack Valenti and the honchos at the
MOT that he was forgiven. Cash now lives in Great Britain and Italy.</span>"

[Nelson3]

Voight again -- he has a lot to learn yet, but oh boy is he light years ahead of the rest of his industry.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccdsI_I3vTc
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="watch-line-title">John Voight Statement
</span></h1>

[Nelson3]

Oliver Stone, Hitlocaust revisionist? Can't get much more major than that! WHOOPEEE, our ship is coming in! It's all paying off! DIE, MONSTER, DIE!!!


</font>NewsLink• </font>History</font>
</font>Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Context*</font>
07-27-2010 </font>• </font>Alana Goodman via NewsBusters.org</font>
Director Oliver Stone belittled the Holocaust during a shocking interview with the Sunday Times today, claiming that America's focus on the Jewish massacre was a product of the "Jewish domination of the media." </font>
</font>Read Comments</font>•</font> </font>Make a Comment</font>• </font>Email this News Link</font></font>•</font> </font>Send Letter to Editor</font>





LATER.... not by much:
<div ="title">'Worst Bush-era policies' rapidly becoming the 'new normal': ACLU
</div> <div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">From
the point of view of civil libertarians, the Obama administration has
been an exercise in frustration, with every hopeful sign followed by
failures to live up to its own promises</div>








Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

via email sans source:

Atheist barred from office in North Carolina?posted at 9:30 am on December </span><br style="font-weight: bold;">10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey </span><br style="font-weight: bold;">Share on Facebook | printer-friendly A strange story surrounding a North
Carolina city council election has suddenly become national news. Cecil
Bothwell won his election fairly, a fact no one disputes. However, the
former head of the Asheville NAACP has attempted to block Bothwell's seating
by pointing out an obscure clause in North Carolina's state constitution
that bars atheists from holding public office. The dispute will likely have
to be settled in federal court:
"I'm not saying that Cecil Bothwell is not a good man, but if he's an
atheist, he's not eligible to serve in public office, according to the state
constitution," said *** H.K. Edgerton, a former Asheville NAACP president.
Article 6, section 8 of the state constitution says: "The following persons
shall be disqualified for office: First, any person who shall deny the being
of Almighty God."
Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution trump the restriction in the state
constitution, said Bob Orr, executive director of the N.C. Institute for
Constitutional Law.
"I think there's any number of federal cases that would view this as an
imposition of a religious qualification and violate separation of church and
state," said Orr, a former state Supreme Court justice.
Some confusion over Bothwell's actual status has arisen since then.
Bothwell doesn't like the term "atheist," preferring "post-theist" instead.
He lists himself as an atheist on his Myspace page. Bothwell also denied
the specific charge of "deny[ing] the being of Almighty God," saying that
the question is irrelevant for his public office.
But it's not as if this was something voters didn't know before the
election. Bothwell's opponents attacked him for a book that he had written
called The Prince of War that attacked Billy Graham for pursuing a
"theocratic agenda." Bothwell apparently isn't bright enough to understand
the difference between public policy in a democracy and a real theocracy
(like Iran), but voters had the opportunity to take that under consideration
as well. They chose Bothwell, "post-theism" and all.
The state constitution does bar publicly-avowed atheists from holding
office, but Article 6, Section 8 won't withstand court scrutiny. The
Supreme Court has already overturned Maryland's constitutional bar for
public office on religious affiliation in 1961, and North Carolina will lose
this one, too. The federal constitution bars religious tests for office,
which will trump North Carolina's Section 8, probably on a unanimous vote.
For those who may be tempted to argue federalism, the incorporation doctrine
that would appear to dictate that outcome in this case is also the same line
of thought that the court used to dismiss gun bans as a violation of the
Second Amendment.
This is a foolish and wrong-headed objection to the outcome of a fair
election. Unlike some other laws the courts have tossed for merely being
stupid, this one is also unconstitutional and should be eliminated. The
people of North Carolina would be well advised to repeal it themselves and
to let Bothwell take his place on the city council.
I'm still mystified as to why a former head of the NAACP would bother to
inject himself into this situation at all.
Update: Plenty of schadenfreude for atheists in this thread, but commenter
Good Lt reminds them of what's at stake:
Let's flip it around for the people claiming "haha serves atheists right!"
here.
If a deist or a believer (of any faith) was barred from serving in office in
a state Constitution, would you support the restriction? If a clan of
Dawkins worshipers managed to get a state constitution changed to put this
restriction in, would you shrug and just say, "eh, whatever?"
--
------------------------------------------------------------ -----
6 O LORD, I say to you, "You are my God."
Hear, O LORD, my cry for mercy.
7 O Sovereign LORD, my strong deliverer,
who shields my head in the day of battle-
8 do not grant the wicked their desires, O LORD;
do not let their plans succeed,
or they will become proud. Selah
Psalm 140 NIV </pre></span>

[Nelson3]

That purty little talking head wasn't expecting this!

http://www.infowars.com/we-got-one-t...e-former-obama noid-reveals-truth-on-fox-news/

Thank God the less pretty (well, dumpy) guest has Republicans to blame for everything.

Longer version:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0TOn_0g8zA
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="watch-line-title">Hitting the Ground Jobless?
</span></h1>A show that follows it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjLtVZ-0w6w&amp;NR=1
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="watch-line-title">Border School Erects Barbed Wire Fenc</span></h1>I guess we'd have to credit this Lip Gloss Monster, whoever she is, with having some brains for taking on these subjects and not bringing on spokesmen from "the other side of the issue</span>" like they always do. Somebody must have told her TV sets are going out permanently all across the land and the force-feeding process had to be eased some.


Edited by: Nelson3

[Nelson3]

Yeah, yeah, I know some of you don't want anything good ever to be said about a black, and that this piece is way off in some ways, but it has much good to offer.

E.g., the ultimate irony of the First "Black" "president" courting hispanics because he thinks Dems need their votes...... Oh!Bummer's implication of "the hell with ameriKan blacks if it throws millions of them out of work!"

See? Liberalism is simply a drive toward total insanity. It doesn't even make sense from a liberal point of view. It eats its own and calls 'em lobster tail.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Marcus/lloyd151.htm

<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" align="center">BLACK
CIVIL RIGHTS MAFIA BETRAYS BLACK AMERICA</font></div>


By
Lloyd Marcus

September 4, 2010

NewsWithViews.com</font>