I'm enjoying the latest issue of the Nationalist Times and, as always, reveling in editor Don Wassall's incomparable wit. "You think so, Sherlock?" ROTF!!!!........</span>[img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]
The long, florid quote from former top CIA operative Robert Baer is one of the most devastating ever to Jewish supremacism in ameriKa. Here's a big chunk of it.
"You Can't Talk About The Reality Of Israel" </font>
Omid Memarian interviews former CIA operative ROBERT BAER
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21856.htm
January 27, 2009 "</font>IPS<b style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">" -- I[/b]n
an interview with IPS, Baer discussed the regional implications of the
Gaza conflict and his take on Iran's Revolutionary Guard, Hamas and
Hezbollah, three major groups in the Middle East which have been called
terrorist organisations.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
Excerpts from the interview follow.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
IPS: Some analysts believe that attacking Hamas in Gaza, two years
after the 34-day war between Israel and Hezbollah, is a part of a
bigger plan which will end with attacking Iran's nuclear facilities. Is
Israel walking this path?</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
Robert Baer: No. I think that there is a military veto in attacking Iran. It's just not possible.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
IPS: Why is that impossible?</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
RB: Well, for one thing, we know there will be an Iranian reaction in
the Gulf. Iran will not be attacked like Hamas and just respond
locally. It will respond internationally. It has no choice. This is
their deterrence power. In Iran, it is very important to understand a
lot of lessons.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
If you look on the IRGC [Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps] website,
you see the lessons they learned from the Iran-Iraq War. These wars are
wars of attrition; they go on forever. You just can't win them,
especially against the United States. So they have developed secondary
asymmetrical warfare ability, guerilla warfare, which is very effective.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
You know some of the best minds in Iran went into the Pasdaran
[Revolutionary Guards], and they weren't necessarily fanatics. In a
sense, they were much more nationalists. And in my experience, these
people in the Pasdaran, in the operational level, are probably the most
capable, intelligent/guerilla force/political thinkers in the Middle
East, including Israel and Jordan. And they knew exactly what they were
doing. And they do not clearly fit in to any political definitions in
Iran.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
IPS: Is the possibility of a limited attack on Iran's nuclear
facilities by Israel also out of question? Especially given what we
learned in a recent New York Times article that last year, Israeli
leaders asked President Bush to carry out such an attack, though the
president did not accept.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
RB: Totally out of the question. Even Bush understood this. The New
York Times is right when it says that Bush vetoed an Israeli attack,
simply because there is a balance of power in the Middle East between
the U.S. and Iran, and it's a fairly even balance of power. I mean not
in terms of aircraft tanks or submarines, but in a monopoly of
violence, there is equality.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
There is no question there is equality. We could bomb Tehran, but what
does that get you? Nothing. It's sort of like bombing the U.N. compound
in Gaza by Israel. What does that give the Israelis? Nothing. Yeah they
could destroy it, but what does that give them? Hamas still is going to
exist.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
You can bomb all military bases in Iran over a period of two weeks, but
Iran is still there - it still has the ability to project power,
project its will and maybe even come out of that type of conflict even
stronger. And Iran's power is so economical, the price of oil is not
going to make any difference, simply because the idea of arming
Hezbollah or supporting Hamas in Damascus is nothing in terms of money.
I mean the price of oil could go down to 10 dollars, and it's still an
affordable defence for Iran.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
IPS: Obama has repeatedly mentioned talking to Iranian leaders and
bringing change to U.S. foreign policy. How could the designation of
Dennis Ross as a key advisor on Iran policy contribute to his promises?</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
RB: Dennis Ross - the important thing is the Israelis are comfortable
with him. If a dialogue with Iran occurs, they know he won't betray
them. I mean they have had years and years of testing this guy. He's
Jewish, he's been honest with the Israelis; he's gone along with their
projects, even the crazy ones. If a dialogue is open, the Israelis know
they won't be surprised. If Obama had brought someone new in, some
professor from Harvard that the Israelis didn't know, they would
immediately freeze him out and there would be huge political blowbacks.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
IPS: Regarding Ross's positions on certain issues in the Middle East
and particularly Iran over the past decade, how will Obama be able to
adopt a new foreign policy path in the region?</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
RB: Well, he [Obama] needs the backing of the Democratic Party to get
these things through politically, and that's why he has brought in
people like Dennis Ross and Denny Blair, the Director of National
Intelligence, simply because he needs that political backing. He cannot
bring in untried people and run them against the Democratic Party,
because if there is an opening with Iran, there will be a connivance of
Israel, maybe a silent one, simply because the Israelis have to go
along.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
In American politics, you can't do anything in the Middle East without
the approval of Tel Aviv, at least on some level. It's impossible. I
mean, I cannot think of a country that is so beholden to a small
country like this, even a superpower, in all of history. I can't even
think of it.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
IPS: And why is that?</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
RB: Look at New York City. Look at the major newspapers. They have a
Zionist agenda. They do. I'm not Jewish. I'm not anything. I don't care
about the Israelis. And I'm not anti-Semitic. It's just a fact. I
suggested to my publisher writing a book on Israel, and he said forget
it. You can't talk about the reality of Israel. The only place you can
talk about the reality of Israel is in Israel. They tell you things you
will never hear in the United States.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
IPS: Like what?</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
<br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 51);">
RB: For instance, why are people on Gaza so unhappy? Well, if you had
to live in a prison, wouldn't you be unhappy? You would never get that
in the New York Times. Look at the New York Times; it's almost an
extension of Israel.</span>
Later.</span><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"></font><br style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">SHOCKED BY ISRAELI ATROCITIES IN GAZA </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;">Human rights organization </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;">calls for suspension of arms aid to Israel</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;">Suspend military aid to Israel, Amnesty urges </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;">Obama after detailing US weapons used in Gaza </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;">By RORY McCARTHY </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;">The Guardian, London Monday, 23 February 2009 </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">JERUSALEM — Detailed evidence has emerged of Israel's extensive </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">use of US-made weaponry during its war in Gaza last month, </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">including white phosphorus artillery shells, 500-lb bombs and Hellfire </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">missiles. </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">In a report released today, Amnesty International detailed the </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">weapons used and called for an immediate arms embargo on Israel </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">and all Palestinian armed groups. It called on the Obama administration </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">to suspend military aid to Israel...................</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...litary-aid-isr ael-amnesty
RELATED ARTICLES:
<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Amnesty International urges freeze on arms sales to Israel </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1066231.html</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Amnesty: Israel harms Palestinian civilians, exploits foreigners</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/987986.html </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Amnesty Int'l: Winograd report fails to address Israel's war crimes</span> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/950158.html </span>
Edited by: Nelson3
ADL's junkmail recently included a "Mainstream Anti-Semitism" flier so gorgeous it's worth hanging on the wall. "Every day," its heading grouses, "cyber hate is being perpetuated on some of the most frequently visited web sites". Ain't-a that good news when you know what they're reall driving at!
The piece features excrescences of free speech per Kevin MacDonald, Myspace, and, most stunningly, Arun Gandhi, a grandchild of the Mahatma:
"Jewish identity in the past has been locked into the Holocaust
experience -- a German burden that the Jews have not been able to shed. It is a very good example of [how] a community can
overplay a historic experience to the point that it begins to repulse
friends.... Any nation that remains anchored to the past is unable to move ahead and, especially a nation that believes its survival can only be ensured by weapons and bombs.... We
have created a culture of violence (Israeli and the Jews are the
biggest players) and that Culture of Violence is eventually going to
destroy humanity</span>."
</font>As I write, the beginning of the quote shows 386 Google hits, and that's good!
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&a...mp;as_epq=jewi sh+identity+in+the+past+has+been+locked+into+the+& amp;as_oq= &as_eq=&num=10&lr=&as_filetype=&am p;ft=i& ; ;as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=all&as_rights=& as_occt=an y&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=image s
Here's one that gives a Washington Post source for it:
<div style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Breaking Taboos In the Search For Truth </font></div>
<div style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Arun Gandhi's Pursuit of Peace</div>by Muriel Mirak-Weissbach</span>
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...=va&aid=80 30
the unfortunately inoperative DC Post url:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...rticle/2008/02 /01/AR2008020102506_pf
Where have they been hiding this man?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arun_Gandhi
The Mahatma was of course politically incorrect in the extreme, and has been extremely distorted in the mythmaking since his death. To cut to the chase, simply search gandhi </span>racist.</span> You'll feel good all over!
Edited by: Nelson3
Add Pravda to the list! It's a paper, not a person -- but in this mad age, the former main instrument of mass brainwashing in the world is now one of the extremely few periodicals willing to tell the unvarnished truth about important matters.
Too bad this exciting news comes via such a dismal vehicle as the following clearly pro-Oh!Bummer and pro-ameriKan article, though. Scotland is a fabled bastion of freedom fever, but its main newspaper appears to be a sorry gew-tool.
Emphasis mine.
Obama assured of a chilly Russian welcome despite first signs of thaw</span></font><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">By Chris Stephen in New York</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">BARACK Obama will have few traffic problems getting to the Kremlin for his first summit with Russian president Dmitri Medvedev on Monday – the Obamamania that has swept much of the rest of the world is absent from Moscow; there will be no adoring crowds to greet him.</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
A recent poll by Russia's Levada Centre found only 23 per cent of citizens believe the US president will "do the right thing in world affairs", with many doubting his promise of change will heal antagonisms between Russia and the West.</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">A long list of issues – from Nato's eastward expansion, to missile defence, to human rights, to the contest for oil and gas in Central Asia – continue to poison relations between the former Cold War superpowers.</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Russian news agency Pravda was less than subtle in an editorial summing up the Obama administration, headlined: "Obama: Deceiver, cheat, swindler, liar, fraudster, con-artist."</span></span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">The root cause of the antagonism is a belief in the Kremlin that relations with the West must inevitably be a "zero-sum" game – every gain for the West is a loss for Russia.</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Masha Lipman, </span>of the Moscow Carnegie Centre research group, said: "Russia has negative priorities, so-called 'red lines', such as Nato enlargement that might include Georgia or Ukraine".........</span>
Later. </span>
You have to give Alan Keyes credit -- on topic O, he is extremely articulate and outspoken.
<h3 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" ="entry-er">Obama Is A "Radical Communist"</h3> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid.../alan_keyes_ob ama_communist.html<br clear="all">
Edited by: Nelson3
I had to dig for this one (via examerica.com) -- but for you folks it's worth it.[img]smileys/smiley14.gif[/img]
Delightfully, this article is not only written by good "Irishmen" but its source appears thoroughly "Irish" as well: "The editors are Deborah Chasman and philosopher Joshua Cohen" (Wikipedia).
http://bostonreview.net/BR34.4/lomnitz_sanchez.php
<h3 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">United By Hate</font></h3>
The uses of anti-Semitism in Chávez’s Venezuela</span>
Claudio Lomnitz and Rafael Sánchez</span></font>
On
January 30, 2009 fifteen heavily armed men stormed the Tiferet Israel
synagogue in the Mariperez neighborhood of Caracas. They held down two
guards, robbed the premises, and desecrated the temple, throwing the
Torah and other religious paraphernalia to the floor and painting
graffiti on the walls: “Out, Death to All”; “Damned Israel, Death”;
“666” with a drawing of the devil; “Out Jews”; “We don’t want you,
assassins”; a star of David, an equal sign, and a swastika.The
event, though shocking, was neither isolated nor unprecedented. Over
the past four years, Venezuela has witnessed alarming signs of
state-directed anti-Semitism, including a 2005 Christmas declaration
by President Hugo Chávez himself: “The World has enough for everybody,
but some minorities, the descendants of the same people that crucified
Christ, and of those that expelled Bolívar from here and in their own
way crucified him. . . . have taken control of the riches of the world.”In
late 2004 the police stormed Hebraica, a Jewish social, educational,
and sports center, ostensibly to search for guns and explosives. No
weapons were found. But finding them may never have been the purpose of
the raid: it coincided with the beginning of Hugo Chávez’s official
visit to Tehran. Thus, Sammy Eppel, director of the Human Rights
Commission of the Venezuelan B’nai B’rith, poignantly interpreted the event: “Chávez was showing Iran: ‘This is how I deal with my Jews.’”According
to the World Conference against Anti-Semitism that took place in London
in February 2009, the Chavista media became noticeably more aggressive
between October and December of last year. Aporrea, the
principal Chavista online journal, published 136 anti-Jewish texts; and
since the start of the year, the Conference counted an average of 45
pieces per month. In the 30 days between December 28, 2008 and January
27, 2009, coinciding with the Israeli invasion of Gaza, the number of
pieces increased to an average of more than five per day.This
kind of tally may blur the distinction between criticisms of Israeli
policies and sheer anti-Semitism, but the prominence of classically
anti-Semitic themes, tones, and sentiments is nonetheless staggering
and undeniable. Indeed, since the 2006 war in Lebanon, anti-Semitic
comments have become commonplace not only in Aporrea, but also in other media outlets either controlled by or ideologically close to the government—such as Vea and Cadena Venezolana de Televisión, especially its program La Hojilla—and publicly and community-owned radio stations. Mario Silva, the anchor of La Hojilla—the main television outlet of Chávez’s ideology, known as Chavismo—declared
on November 28, 2007, at a time when a student movement against Chávez
was consolidating, that the Cohen family, owners of the Sambil chain of
malls<blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">are financing all that is happening. I have
said for a long time that those Jewish businessmen who are not in the
conspiracy should publicly come forth. . . . And many of those in the
student movement that is currently activated have a lot to do with that
group.</blockquote>Another egregious and symptomatic example is a January 20, 2009 article by Emilio Silva in Aporrea,
titled “How to Support Palestine against the Artificial State of
Israel,” in which Silva calls for measures to isolate the Jewish
population inside Venezuela as well as its supposed allies, ultimately
the Venezuelan opposition tout court. It also calls for the
destruction of the state of Israel, and associates Judaism with
“Euro-Gringo” imperial interests in such disparate places as
Afghanistan, Congo, and Colombia.Beyond the specifics of Emilio
Silva’s political program, the idiom of the critique is baldly that of
modern anti-Semitism. Thus, Silva characterizes the enemy as “those
Zionist Hebrews [who] care more for their pocket-books than for
anything else, including Jehova” and calls on his readers to “publicly
demand that any Jew in any street, mall, square, etc., take a position
[with respect to Israel] by yelling slogans in favor of Palestine and
against the miscarried and disfigured state (estado-aborto) of Israel.”Chávez
himself has been at the forefront of an effort to equate Israel with
Hitler, and then to retroject Jewish conspiracy onto the Venezuelan
opposition.</span>....
Edited by: Nelson3
Man, is Norway going politically incorrect? The only other place I've ever read of this littérateur was an eloquent feature article on him in Instauration, the 1980s-90s underground magazine of intellectual racialism. Two things were striking about the piece: the empyrean praises the world used to heap upon Hamsun, and his near-worshipful regard of Hitler. He received a silver or gold medal for his work and sent it to the Fuehrer as a heartfelt tribute to what he thought he represented.
I got the impression Hamsun was in his lifetime widely regarded as an all-time great novelist -- rightly so, no doubt -- and am pleasantly shocked the Norwegian government is pulling him up out of the politically-incorrect memory hole. Each Scandinavian country used to be a family. I suppose they could be racially redeemed where our own ethnic dumping ground appears to be beyond it.
Controversy Continues Over Honoring of Norwegian Writer Hamsun
Haaretz (Israel)
Norway's honoring of novelist and Nazi-sympathizer Knut Hamsun "does
not in any way affect" the country's chairmanship of the international
task force for Holocaust education, the body's head yesterday said. But
the Raul Wallenberg Foundation told Norway's queen that in light of the
chairmanship, Hamsun's commemoration was "incomprehensible." Last month
Haaretz quoted prominent anti-Semitism campaigners who said Norway was
not suited to chair the Task Force for International Cooperation on
Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research (ITF), due to its
commemoration of the 150th anniversary of Hamsun's birth this year.
Hamsun was a Nobel Prize winner who publicly supported Nazism.
</font>
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1101691.html
Edited by: Nelson3
Don't tell me former Malaysian Prime Minister Mohathir Mohamed hasn't been honored here yet? You'll recall his stunning the world in 2003 with some frank utterances about gew power, but I see he (despite being 84 years old) is quite busy with this organization
http://www.criminalisewar.org/
and that his work on the abovementioned problem goes back almost 40 years! E.g.:
Mahathir's public remarks about Jews date back as early as 1970 when he wrote in his controversial book </span><i style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">The Malay Dilemma[/i]: </span><i style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">"The Jews for example are not merely hook-nosed, but understand money instinctively."[/i]<sup style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="cite_ref-38">[</span>39]</span></sup><sup style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="cite_ref-BostonGlobe_39-0">[</span>40]</span></sup>
[img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img][img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahathi...mad#Other_cont roversies
Later. </span>
Whoa, TAKI CROSSES OVER into the realm of those that we learn are willing to name the gew!</span> As you know, club rules allow for entrance for celebrities (any kind) who so much as hint or joke to that effect, provided it's unmistakable, very public, and miles from any possibility of apology. Emphasis mine:
http://www.takimag.com/site/archive/
http://www.takimag.com/article/dear_leaders/
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="titleCategory">High Life</font></div>
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="titleTitle">Dear Leaders</font></div>
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="titleByline">by Taki Theodoracopulos on October 01, 2009</div>
NEW YORK–Cement barriers, stanchions, cop cars, motorcycles, black
SUV’s, flashing lights, bullhorn warnings to move to the side or else,
mean-looking dudes in dark suits, dark glasses and talking into their
cufflinks, a hobbit named Sarkozy jogging in Central Park to the
exclusion of the rest of us, African dictator kleptocrats emptying
jewelry shops on Fifth Avenue, Netanyahu walking down Park after the
residents of that tony street had been removed, that was the Big Bagel</font>
last week when the zoo that’s the UN Security Council came to town. The
hate fest rolls on, fueled by the arrogance of our supposed</span> …
STOP THE PRESSES -- EUREKA!</span></font> Always check Wikipedia: </span><br style="font-style: italic;">
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taki_Th...los#Controvers ies <br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Taki has been criticised for using ethnic slurs by the newspaper The Guardian, in an article criticizing London mayor Boris Johnson for employing him <sup id="cite_ref-4" ="reference">[</span>5]</span></sup> and he has been investigated by Scotland Yard for some of his racial comments.<sup id="cite_ref-5" ="reference">[</span>6]</span></sup> Due to Taki's characterization of himself as a "soi-disant antisemite",<sup id="cite_ref-6" ="reference">[</span>7]</span></sup> coupled with strong criticism of the Israeli government and its supporters in the United States, The Spectator no longer permits him to write about Israel or Jewish affairs. In a follow-up Spectator column,<sup id="cite_ref-7" ="reference">[</span>8]</span></sup> Taki stated that he does not consider himself an anti-Semite and that the term "soi-disant antisemite"
was intended to mean "so-called" rather than "self-styled". Taki claims
some of his comments are intended "to piss off politically correct
journalists" and not to be taken at face value, and that he wasn't
bothered himself by ethnic slurs in his youth. "The Italians were
called wops, the Jews were called hymies, I was of course a greaseball,
and every Hispanic was a spic. Well, we all got along famously! It was
rough, but it was fine. Obviously, one doesn't like to be called a
greaseball, but you know — Greek, greaseball . . . Now, of course, all
that is very, very unacceptable."<sup id="cite_ref-8" ="reference">[</span>9]</span></sup>
He has expressed his admiration of the Wehrmacht in his "High Life" column in The Spectator</span>...........ETC.
Edited by: Nelson3
via ihr.org:
<b style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">Brazil's President in Israel Refuses Visit to Herzl's Grave[/b]<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
JTA ( New York )
</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
Brazil 's president said he would not visit the grave of Theodor Herzl
during his first official visit to Israel . President Luiz Ignacio Lula
da Silva, who arrived in Israel on Sunday, refused to visit Herzl's
grave, which is part of the itinerary for visiting foreign officials
this year in honor of the 150th anniversary of the father of Zionism.
The Brazilian president is reportedly scheduled to visit the grave of
Yasir Arafat during a visit to Ramallah. "It is an insult to Israel 's
citizens and to Zionist communities around the world," World Zionist
Organization head Hagai Merom said Monday.
</span>
<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"></font>General Petraeus Warns: Israel Is Jeopardizing US Security Interests
Democracy Now
Veteran military and foreign affairs analyst and author Mark Perry
reports that CENTCOM commander General David Petraeus dispatched a team
of senior military officers in January to brief Joint Chiefs of Staff
chairman Admiral Michael Mullen on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Perry reports that the briefers told Mullen that "Israeli intransigence
on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was jeopardizing US standing in the
region." Transcript and video......... </font>
Would somebody please explain something? Izrul has been defying world opinion, common sense,and basic decency in every way it could for 62 years. What's different now? Seems it me it can only be the fact that we anti-Zionists are seeing our long years of trying to awaken the public coming to fruition. And let's face it -- this new fedgov tilt could also be an accidental side benefit of having a towelhead president. Sometimes things get so bad, they get good.
Edited by: Nelson3
via email: "
Fw: Turkish PM Erdogan says Israel is 'threat to peace'--Israel Feels the Heat and the Wrath"</font>
<div>Notice that you have to read foreign reports to find the truth.</font></div>
<div>White phosphorous use is banned in warfare. The evil Israelis use it against Palestinian civilians, even women and children .</font></div>
<div></div>
<div>Check who owns the American media to see why you only get one side of the news of the Middle East, even on Fox.</font></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>
--- On Wed, 4/7/10, ReporterNotebook</span> <RePorterNoteBook@Gmail.com> wrote:
</div>
From: ReporterNotebook <RePorterNoteBook@Gmail.com>
Subject: Turkish PM Erdogan says Israel is 'threat to peace'--Israel Feels the Heat and the Wrath
To: "reportersnotebook" <RePortersNoteBook@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 1:45 PM
</span>
<h1 style="font-weight: bolder; outline-width: 0px;">Turkish PM Erdogan says Israel is 'threat to peace'</span></h1></span>
<div>
<div style="">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<t>
</t><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<t><tr>
<td valign="top">
<div>Are you listening, America and Britain? You are known by the
company you keep! You have sold your honour, your integrity and your
security for an unworthy alliance with a miniscule stolen nation led by
rabid rabbis. Shame on you. </div>
<div></div>
<div>http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/middle_ east/8607795. stm</div></td></tr></t></table>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
</font></font></div></div></div></div></div>
--
Click here: The World's Most Important Visual Holocaust Revisionist Website!
<div>
</div>
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@ Gmail.com
Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton
Edited by: Nelson3
The MSM is under Z.O.G control, hence their stifling of Erdogan's (accurate) sentiments!</span><h1 style="font-weight: bolder; outline-width: 0px;">
</span></h1>
"it is often more dangerous being America’s ally than its enemy" -- casually attributed to Kissinger here, per anunews:
http://www.ericmargolis.com/politica...ries/the-puppe t-tries-to-cut-his-strings.aspx
There's nothing new about the Shah's boldness, but isn't it refreshing even this long after the fact. He spoke at a time when being totally forthright would have had grave consequences.
Can you believe "Mike Wallace"? I ask you, can you believe "Mike Wallace"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gr3QKgtlLo
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="watch-line-title">
Shah of Iran Mike Wallace on the Jewish Lobby 33 Yrs ago</span></h1>Yumm! </span>--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKYlvyZwHHU&NR=1
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" id="watch-line-title">
Shah's Message to the "Blue Eyed People"</span></h1>
Edited by: Nelson3
Oh my goodness</span>, the poor rabbi can't even get an "Amen" from the other Eurocrat!
What is this world coming to?
<div style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" ="wrap padding-left-big">
<div ="articleline line-newswire">
<ul ="c -articleStamp"><li ="dateStamp first">September 3, 2010, 7:26 AM ET[/list]
<h1>EU Official in Trouble for Remarks on Jews</h1>
</div>
</div><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><h3 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" ="byline">By John W. Miller</h3>Karel De Gucht, the European trade commissioner, has a penchant for
saying what he’s really thinking. As Belgian foreign minister, he
ruffled feathers across the globe. He was notoriously tough on
Belgium’s former colony, the Congo, criticizing corruption and
emphasizing that Belgium’s aid contributions gave it “the moral
authority to comment on issues affecting the country.” Congo
subsequently banned Mr. De Gucht from visiting.
On Thursday, with the Middle East peace process in the news, Mr. De
Gucht picked yet another fight. Jews, he told Belgian radio, have a
“belief” that they are “always right.” He described his frustration at
debating the Middle East because “it is not easy even with a moderate
Jew to have a conversation.”
He continued: “Don’t underestimate the power of the Jewish lobby in
the capital. That is best organized lobby in the states. And they have
an influence on politicians, Republicans and Democrats.”
Dr. Moshe Kantor, president of the European Jewish Congress,
lambasted the commissioner. “What sort of environment allows such
remarks to be made openly by a senior politician?” he said. “This is
part of a dangerous trend of incitement against Jews and Israel in
Europe that needs to be stamped out immediately.”
European Commission spokesman Olivier Bailly, pressed repeatedly on
whether the commission disavows Mr. De Gucht’s remarks, said only that
the commission considers them “personal comments”.............
ihr.org
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/world/europe/04iht-union.html" target="_blank" target="_blank">European
Trade Chief Accused of Anti-Semitism</a>
The New York Times
[img]webpics/degucht_09102010.jpg[/img] The European Union's chief trade
negotiator was accused on Friday of "outrageous anti-Semitism" after comments
made in an interview about Israel's role in Middle East peace talks. Karel De
Gucht, the European commissioner for trade, told a radio station in his native
Belgium that the "average Jew" had a belief that they are right, which was
"difficult to counter with rational arguments." ... Mr. De Gucht also said the
Jewish community wielded its influence in the United States. "Don't
underestimate the power of the Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill," he added. "That is
the best organized lobby; you shouldn't underestimate the grip it has on
American politics -- no matter whether it's Republicans or Democrats" </font>...........
<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><b style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/rafbombercommand/7985917/Dresden-mayor-to-lobby-against-building-of-Bomber-Command-memorial.html" target="_blank">Dresden
Mayor Against Memorial to World War II British Bombers</a>[/b]<br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">The Telegraph
(Britain) </span><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">[img]webpics/dresden_09102010.jpg[/img] The mayor
of the German city of Dresden has flown into London under pressure from fellow
politicians to try to get a planned memorial to Second World War bomber crews
scrapped. Helma Orosz, 57, is officially in Britain to open an exhibition on the
bombing of London, her city and that of its twin, Coventry, during the war. She
is under pressure however to get the memorial, which is to recognise the courage
of RAF bomber crews, scrapped. The East German city of Dresden was turned into
rubble over two days nights in February 1945 by British and American bombers.
Some 25,000 people, mostly women and children, died in savage firestorms whipped
up by the intense heat of 2,400 tons of high explosive and 1,500 tons of
incendiary bombs. The raid was controversial because the war was almost over and
Dresden had no strategic value as a military target</span>............ </font>
Edited by: Nelson3
<h2>
Turkish Document Defines Israel as 'Central Threat' </span></h2>
<div style="width: 100%; color: rgb(102, 0, 0);">
The Turkish National Security Council approved a few days ago
significant changes in a document which contains threats against Turkey
claiming that Israel is now a major threat to the country, Turkish
media reported Saturday. http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=193322 </div>
IHR
Kissinger Says `Gas Chamber' Remark Should Be Viewed in Context
JTA
It should have been ancient, if unsavory, news: A cavalier reference to gassing Jews, an aside in a conversation nearly 40 years old. But the aside was pronounced by Henry Kissinger, a German-born Jew who fled Nazi horrors as a child and who has been honored by multiple Jewish organizations as one of Israel's saviors during its darkest days, when he was secretary of state to President Nixon. "If they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern," Kissinger is heard saying on the latest batch of Nixon-era Oval Office tapes released by the Nixon Library.
<HR noShade SIZE=1>
Latest Nixon Tape Buries Henry Kissinger's Reputation
Christopher Hitchens
... In the past, Kissinger has defended his role as enabler to Nixon's psychopathic bigotry, saying that he acted as a restraining influence on his boss by playing along and making soothing remarks. This can now go straight into the lavatory pan, along with his other hysterical lies. Obsessed as he was with the Jews, Nixon never came close to saying that he'd be indifferent to a replay of Auschwitz. For this, Kissinger deserves sole recognition. It's hard to know how to classify this observation in the taxonomy of obscenity. Should it be counted as tactical Holocaust pre-denial? That would be too mild. It's actually a bit more like advance permission for another Holocaust.
Argentina and Brazil Recognize Palestine, Prompting Zionist Anger
BBC News
Israel has reacted angrily to Argentina's recognition of a Palestinian state within 1967 borders. Monday's move by Argentina comes days after a similar step by South American neighbour Brazil. The Argentinian foreign ministry said recognition was in line with the Palestinians' right to build an independent state. More than 100 states around the world recognise Palestine, their mission at the United Nations says. "The time has come to recognise Palestine as a free and independent state," Foreign Minister Hector Timerman said, adding that Argentina was "frustrated" that peace talks had stalled. Brazil recognised Palestine on Friday, and Uruguay said it would do the same next year. Costa Rica, Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela have already done so.
Edited by: Nelson3
Any idea why Obumr is now defying Israel about borders, gang? It would appear on a good day there's finally some real Change in the air:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/20/wo...eeast/20policy. html?_r=1&hp
<h1 style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);" ="articleline">Obama and Netanyahu, Distrustful Allies, to Meet</h1>I have several theories, in approximate order of likelihood:
A. The whole dispute is another pantomime with no actual substance.
B. Izrul sees its days are numbered and has agreed to (or mandated) the scripting of an argument between Nuttin'-Yahoo and Obumr. This would allow O. to play the role of peacemaker where nobody else has succeeded in history, and N. to play the role of aggrieved messiah who has no choice but to comply with what the rest of the world wants.
C. Jewry sees Obumr is nothing but a hangnail on the finger of fate and is getting ready to do a false-flag hit on him, blaming patriots and tea partyists, etc. a la Martin Lucifer King.
D. Washington sees Izrul's days are numbered -- as it has seen wisdom of OSTENSIBLY ending the "war" -- and this is the beginning of the great pullback of support from the bandit ministate. Nothing lasts forever, especially when DC is finally down to its last two nickels.
E. Obumr is sick of being everybody else's sock puppet and grappling for some historical cachet or to help his Moslem brethren and sistren in a way that is gaining in popularity worldwide, but he's also looking forward to being smacked back into line by his handlers.
F. Obumr actually cares about the Palestinians and hates gew supremacism and is ready to take his lumps.
An article entitled "Former Malaysian PM: “Jewish Banking Control Causes Trouble”"
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=36677Dr Mahathir is known for his strident remarks about global Jewish interests. In 2003, he urged Muslims to unite against Jews who, he says, rule the world by “proxy”.
He named Israel as “the enemy allied with most powerful nations,” and said Jews ruled the world and got others to fight and die for them, but added that they would not be able to defeat the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims.
Ms Gillard's reticence is wimpish but very, very good. Her resistance to the pressure qualifies her for inclusion here -- so far.
http://www.eutimes.net/2012/11/austr...ne-un-upgrade/
Australian PM under fire for stance on Palestine UN upgrade
An article entitled "Jewish Supremacists Control U.S. Media, Says Egyptian President"
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=38169Egyptian President Mohamed Morsy has told a group of U.S. senators that he is being smeared in the American media which is run by Jews. His remarks, reported in the Cable foreign affairs journal, were made to a delegation led Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) which included Sens. Chris Coons(D-DE), Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Kirsten Gilibrand (D-NY).
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
