Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Cornered Rats and the PPT

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    564


    The PPT, of course, is the Plunge Protection Team.

    The article is rather lengthy and a bit dated (March 26, 2003), but well worth reading through, since the Fed-PPT is increasingly active, staving off the Day of Reckoning, but making that inevitable Day even more horrendous when it comes.


    Thereare at least two inflation calculators on the internet which indicate (believe it or not) that the 1800 dollar would actually buy MORE in 1913 than in 1800, probably due to the Industrial Revolution and the mass production of what had been handcraft items before. Enter the Federal Reserve and its printing presses; now your 1913 dollar is worth five cents!


    "All progressresults from change, but not all change is progress."


    ************************************************** ********** *********

    CORNERED RATS AND THE PPT

    Nelson Hultberg

    There is a new wrinkle to consider regarding the government's Plunge
    Protection Team (PPT), which the investing public needs to be made
    aware of. First, however, some groundwork on the PPT, its origins,
    and its assumed purposes. Then I will present a theory about the PPT
    that should further validate its existence and clue us in to what it
    has planned for the future.

    Conventional Wall Street media and Washington establishment types
    are quick to denigrate those of us who theorize about the
    establishment of a secretive PPT organization to manipulate the
    markets. But it is a matter of public record that the Working Group
    on Financial Markets (WGFM), which we allege to be the parent to the
    PPT, was formed under the Reagan administration. It was done by
    Executive Order on March 18, 1988.

    This order states that the major appointees of this group are to be
    the Secretary of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve Chairman, the SEC
    Chairman, and the CFTC Chairman and those they designate to fulfill
    their purposes. The purposes, as defined in the Executive Order, are
    to "[enhance] the integrity, efficiency, orderliness, and
    competitiveness of our Nation's financial markets and [maintain]
    investor confidence." The order goes on to say, "To the extent
    permitted by law and subject to the availability of funds therefore,
    the Department of the Treasury shall provide the Working Group with
    such administrative and support services as may be necessary for the
    performance of its functions." (Executive Order 12631 of March 18,
    1988, 53 FR, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 559)

    The WGFM was formed in the aftermath of the crash of 1987 as a
    natural effort by government bureaucracy to do for the economy what
    it thinks it is supposed to do -- intervene and manipulate the
    workings of the marketplace so as to create an ordered economy, an
    economy that is to the greatest possible extent devoid of
    volatility, disruption, severity, loss, etc. So it is in this
    context that we need to consider the origins of the PPT. At the
    time, there was great fear that something very big had to now be
    done to regulate the stock market and smooth out its potential
    volatility. The WGFM (in conjunction with mega-bankers they chose)
    was to make sure there was always sufficient "liquidity" to prevent
    any serious plummeting of the market again. And whatever additional
    interventions were deemed to be necessary would have to be tolerated.

    The fact that severe market volatility was largely a result of
    government manipulation of the money supply and interest rates was
    merely blanked out on by the WGFM and its creators. A study of our
    nation's economic history will show to any objective observer that
    there are natural fluctuations inherent in the free-market that
    humans must always put up with, but which are always self-corrected
    if the forces of the market are simply LEFT ALONE. This is basic
    Adam Smith economics; the smoothest economy is a laissez-faire
    economy. But these fluctuations become extremely exacerbated with
    the intervention of government into the mix to try and "manage the
    economy" so as to eliminate these fluctuations. The fact that the
    Federal Government had become in the 20th century a massive
    interventionist-manager of the economy, and thus a massive
    exacerbator of these natural fluctuations, was something that just
    could not be grasped by the bureaucratic mentality. The modern day
    statist has been taught via Marxist-Keynesian indoctrination in
    college to believe that a "free" market is dangerous, chaotic, and
    unworkable. He is not capable (or not willing) to dispute this view.
    Thus, he naturally moves toward more and more MANIPULATION of market
    forces as his duty. And the very volatility he seeks to diminish, he
    intensifies.

    So the climate of government opinion in the aftermath of the 1987
    crash was moving toward even more "interventionist-manipulative"
    tactics than it had felt necessary during previous decades of the
    20th century. In this climate, it is quite natural that the WGFM
    authorities decided that something unprecedented had to now be done
    to guarantee a safe, smooth, crash-free, perma-bull stock market.
    Thus was born the idea of the PPT.

    How the Plunge Protection Team Came About

    Bill King of the highly regarded King Report in New York tells us
    that the PPT sprang from an analysis written and presented by former
    Fed Governor Robert Heller in 1989. After his paper was published is
    when the PPT agenda was formalized.

    King refers to his associate John Crudele's writing on the subject
    of how the stock market was to be rigged. "Heller had just left the
    Fed when he gave a speech suggesting that the central bank should
    step in and take direct action to keep the stock market from
    collapsing. The Fed had taken action before. It made sure there was
    enough liquidity during the crash of '87 to keep the system going.
    It may have even strong-armed a few banks into propping up the
    market. And it has often lowered interest rates at opportune times.

    "But Heller's idea was different. He wanted a more direct approach,
    especially when the bond and currency markets were becoming
    uncontrollable [like they are these days]. Heller believed that in
    an emergency, the Fed should start buying stock index futures
    contracts until it managed to pull stocks out of their nosedive.
    Essentially, whenever there is heavy buying of these futures
    contracts it causes the underlying stock market to rise. The futures
    contracts can be bought cheaply; they are highly leveraged so you
    can get more bang for your buck, and they eliminate the need for a
    rigger to purchase, say, all 30 stocks that make up the Dow. Heller
    explained that the process was simple. And it is. The trouble is,
    the government never has had authority to rig the stock market."
    [email from Bill King, March 11, 2003 -- kingreport@ramkingsec.com]

    King, who at the time was running several equity trading desks in
    New York, goes on to say that it was during Q1 of 1990, as the Japan
    bubble was bursting, that massive S&P futures buying began to be
    used extensively by the trusted agents of the PPT, big 'name'
    brokers in New York. During the crises of the late 90's, this
    massive buying increased even more. By this time, many skeptics of
    such manipulation in the investment advisory business began to
    realize it was definitely taking place.

    If you still doubt, here is a BBC release from the latest King
    Report on the issue: "A deal was struck last week in the United
    States between a former Japanese finance minister and the head of
    the U.S. central bank, the Federal Reserve's Alan Greenspan. There
    was an agreement between Japan and the United States to take action
    cooperatively in foreign exchange, STOCKS and OTHER MARKETS (bonds?
    GOLD?) if the markets face a crisis," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo
    Fukuda said....

    We know never to believe anything until it's been officially denied,
    so we were pleased to note that U.S. Treasury Dept spokesman Tony
    Fratto did just that, stating: "The administration's views on
    markets on interventions are well-known and there has been no change
    in our view." [King Report, March 24, 2003]

    What needs to be grasped by all Americans who invest their money in
    the equity, currency, and commodity markets today is that the PPT is
    not a fantasy conjured up in the minds of conspiracy wackos who see
    aliens from outer space climbing over their backyard fence every
    other month. It is a verifiable reality. It exists. It is bigger
    than any of us imagine. It is the result of the hideous statist
    mindset that is taking over our country -- which believes that all
    aspects of economic life must be regulated and MANIPULATED by
    central planners from Washington. Yet such omnipresent manipulation
    and regulation goes contrary to the logic, the freedom, the entire
    meaning of America. When manifested in specific areas like the stock
    market, it becomes especially unsavory. If such an organization to
    rig the stock market was ever to become widely known throughout the
    country, then confidence in the integrity of the markets would be
    greatly diminished and probably destroyed. So the PPT and all
    federal bureaucrats who know of it must continually deny its
    existence. They must travel by night and operate through surrogates.

    A New and Sinister Use of the PPT

    For the past 12-14 years then, the PPT has been used by Washington
    to control the price movements of the NYSE through the buying of S&P
    futures as former Fed governor Heller advocated. Whenever a crisis
    appears especially threatening, the PPT swings into action to shore
    up equity prices on the exchange. The media sycophants of the
    establishment turn a deaf ear to such a claim, but it is accepted by
    most astute followers of the market today. The sheep who idolize
    CNBC choose to ignore such revelations when divulged to them because
    it is in their interests to have such a shoring-up agency putting a
    floor under them. They are happy with such an arrangement, and being
    unable to grasp the long range ramifications of such market rigging,
    they just dutifully go along to get along. That their profits are
    protected is all they care about. The fact that eventually such
    rigging will destroy the integrity of the markets as free
    institutions of trading is for someone in the future to worry about.

    Well that future is rapidly approaching us. And it concerns the new
    theoretical wrinkle I alluded to above. This is purely hypothetical
    on my part. I have no verification to prove the claim that follows.
    But if the reader will keep an open mind and think logically, he
    should come to the same conclusion that I have.

    What, in the minds of Federal Reserve and Treasury bureaucrats, is
    the most important economic need facing our economy today? And as a
    result of this need, what is it that they desire to do the most? I
    would say their greatest desire is to counter the potential forces
    of deflation that have devastated Japan for over 10 years, and now
    threaten to afflict us also. If this is so, then the most crucial
    problem the Fed and the Treasury has is to get liquidity into the
    system so as to hopefully maintain consumer spending and stimulate
    new capital expansion, but to do so without spooking the foreign
    holders of American equities and bonds into repatriating their
    funds, which would bring about a crash of the dollar and the Dow. If
    the Fed starts printing up dollars wholesale as Bernanke postulated,
    then alarm bells begin sounding throughout the Forex markets and the
    dollar starts falling like an elevator with a severed cable. This
    Washington cannot tolerate. But since it is becoming more and more
    evident that mere Fed manipulation of interest rates is not going to
    be enough to counter the forces of deflation, the printing presses
    have to be brought out. How to start printing money, though, without
    setting off the alarm bells?

    Here is where the Clinton-Rubin "strong dollar" policy and its gold
    leasing scheme becomes instructive. Rubin understood that to
    confront the Republican revolution of '94 and insure Clinton's re-
    election he needed to inflate the money supply; but to do so, he
    needed to suppress the price of gold so as to not alarm the Forex
    markets. However, he could not suppress the price of gold by just
    selling Fed owned gold. That was public; it would set off the Forex
    alarm bells and negate his desire to keep the dollar "strong" while
    still inflating it. He therefore hatched the scheme to lease gold to
    the bullion banks who would then sell it into the market. Leased
    gold could still be carried on the Fed's books as an asset; the
    movement of the gold would not be acknowledged to the world. The
    bond vigilantes and Forex markets would not get alarmed. The dollar
    could be inflated, yet made to appear to be strong. Capital would
    continue to flow into America. Clinton could be re-elected.

    The lesson here is that any substantial printing to inflate the
    money supply must be done SECRETLY. If it is done in large amounts
    by conventional monetization of bonds and deficits, then it will set
    off those nasty alarm bells in the Forex markets. The dollar will
    plummet, capital will flow out of America, and the Dow will crash.

    So the Fed has to print up billions of dollars and inject them into
    the economy without public acknowledgement. Enter the PPT! The
    Treasury Department has by now found that it is a natural vehicle to
    use to funnel "new money" into the market secretly. Since the PPT's
    operations and existence must always be kept secret, then its
    funding (at least its major funding) must also be orchestrated in
    clandestine manner. It must be done offshore. And this is where the
    funding for the PPT undoubtedly comes from. Rubin probably initiated
    this procedure. The Fed prints up billions of dollars and slips them
    into an offshore bank account for say XYZ Investment Corp (which is
    established as a front for the PPT). JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are
    then designated as the brokers for XYZ Corp to act as the funnels to
    bring the "new money" into the economy via the PPT's "market
    stabilization activities." Thus, there are unlimited funds for use
    to short gold, buy dollars, and buy S&P futures whenever the markets
    look to be in jeopardy. Whenever the offshore account runs low, the
    Fed merely prints up more money for a PPT operative to deposit into
    the account.

    Thus, the Fed and the Treasury accomplish two things that help them
    to keep their sinking ship afloat: 1) They shore up both the equity
    and dollar markets and put a cap on the gold market, and 2) they
    also inject billions of "newly printed" dollars into the economy,
    which helps them to counter deflation. The important point, however,
    is that the new dollars are injected into the economy SECRETLY!
    There is no public record of their entry like there would be if the
    Fed monetized the purchase of bonds through its open market
    operations. So the Big Government-Big Banking cartel gets to control
    the equity, currency and commodity markets, and it also gets to
    funnel billions of newly printed dollars into the economy without
    sending out an alarm to the world. In this way, the Federal Reserve
    can print money big time without causing a big sell-off of the
    dollar in the Forex markets and an exodus of foreign capital out of
    America.

    The Federal Government will do anything to avert deflation, keep the
    Dow and the dollar from crashing, and keep gold and silver from
    skyrocketing. USING THE PPT ALLOWS IT TO DO ALL THREE IN A SIMPLE,
    SECRETIVE WAY. It's a perfect tool for the disingenuous
    Machiavellians who run Washington today. As stated, I have no proof
    of any offshore funding, and no Deep Throat contact has informed me
    that the Treasury has bumped the PPT's role into a vehicle to inject
    substantial amounts of "printed" dollars into the economy. But such
    a role is as natural as members of a Mafia family operating
    neighborhood protection rackets. It fits the personas of the
    participants, and it fulfills their needs.

    Will Such Manipulation Work?

    There is an adage that no man and no group is bigger than the
    market -- even government men and groups. This can be borne out by
    any perusal of history. All savvy theoreticians accept this truth.
    And it is especially true if the market trend that the government is
    attempting to manipulate is a Kondratieff winter. The only thing
    that will cure this kind of bear market is the PURGING OF DEBT,
    which is precisely the opposite of what the Fed and Treasury
    machinations are geared to do. They are hell bent upon creating more
    debt and more fiat money to chase more goods and services higher in
    price. This is what they conceive to be "stability" and "prosperity."

    So in the long run, the PPT's manipulatory tactics will not be able
    to stop the gold and silver bull market, nor will they be able to
    stop the continued bear market in equities. No government has ever
    been able to reverse or stop a "primary bull or bear trend" once it
    is launched. All government manipulators can do is delay the
    ultimate destination of the market and make for wild swings of high
    volatility. All they can do is buy some time, which is what
    desperate men always try to do when their backs are against the wall.

    What these manipulators don't realize is that a secular bear market
    is like a great northern blizzard. All we can do is try to calculate
    its duration. All we can do is hunker down and ride it out, while
    loading up on various storm shields that might gain value in
    freezing weather. The manipulators' efforts to stop the development
    of the blizzard will fail, but this doesn't keep them from trying to
    stop it, and in the process creating havoc and volatility along the
    way.

    Therefore, what we can expect from the Fed on an ever increasing
    scale in the upcoming years is an effort to "manage" the dollar down
    slowly so as to alleviate America's trade and current account
    deficits, while trying to keep the Dow from crashing, and also at
    the same time helping JP Morgan and its cohorts in New York to ease
    out of their short derivatives. Thus, the Fed needs to push gold
    down to a low enough price where JP Morgan, et al can buy their
    shorts back without too much of a loss. This buying back then causes
    the gold market to shoot up, which then necessitates that the PPT
    come in and push it back down to where JP Morgan, et al can then
    dump some more of their short contracts. Jim Sinclair thinks the
    recent rocket up to $390 in gold was the first big attempt by JP
    Morgan to close out some of their short positions. It put tremendous
    buying pressure on the price, and it had to be contained. So the PPT
    was brought in to push the price down again. (I am not saying that
    gold didn't get overbought; it did. But you can bet that the PPT was
    right there helping to push the price down once the market turned.
    And it will be ever with us into the foreseeable future trying its
    damndest to convince the world that gold as an investment vehicle is
    a fool's choice.)

    So the Fed's strategy is to try and keep the Dow above 7000 and gold
    below $400 until all the dangers are purged, i.e., until the New
    York banking cartel has eased out of its short positions and U.S.
    corporations are beginning to make profits again. That's why the Fed
    will be making liberal use of the PPT along with lots of rumors and
    smear campaigns over the next decade. This is a very dangerous game
    that these participants are playing, and we need to be aware of it.

    As stated above, the only thing such PPT rigging can accomplish in
    the long run is more WORTHLESS DOLLARS being funneled into the
    economy, which is just more of the paper money poison that is
    killing us. But such rigging will be able to buy the Fed and the New
    York cartel some time. If Greenspan can pull this off until June of
    2004, he then retires, and can drop the whole mess in the lap of his
    successor. He can then escape to his knighthood and become an elder
    statesman. The crash will come on someone else's watch. So it's a
    good bet that such motives and manipulations are a prominent part of
    his present rationale.

    This, in my opinion, is the vision of our Federal Reserve and
    Treasury bureaucrats who are in bed with the mega-bankers of New
    York City. These are desperate men, and desperate men blind
    themselves to long term reality. They shrink their focus down to the
    short run, so as to buy time. This is why the PPT is going to become
    a much bigger and more dangerous element in the investment markets
    as this decade unfolds. We must always keep in mind that desperate
    men are like cornered rats. They will use any means at their
    disposal to avoid loss and humiliation. These are the people who are
    governing us today -- cornered rats.

    Nelson Hultberg
    March 26, 2003
    Nelshultberg@aol.com

    The greatest threat to freedom is not foreign governments. It is our own.

  2. #2


    When we talk about business' outsourcing jobs, it's interesting that the topic is always picked up at the point of money. Money is the bottom line of all thought in our country. Of course, there's a lot of validity to that idea as well. However, my thought is that business' are leaving this country for another reason also that is never stated. That reason is the quality of the worker that our country is providing to business' in America, especially the young worker.


    Every one of ushas heard this phrase "no problem." I've often wondered just what the person(worker) means when they say that. The closest I can come to a translation is [that as long as there's no problem then I'll do it - if there's a problem, then I'm not going to bother]. After many years of this, companies that can are distancing themselves from these workers, if they can. That means outsourcing.


    The reason for this attitude in our young people is thatthey're being taught from a very early age that they're above ( I thought in the past, certain types of endeavors such as physical work, but I've expanded my idea to include workitself, of all types).When we think of jobs, we don't focus onthenegative chain reaction thatoccurs just when a worker is late. Of course, this reaction is moreso if the worker is absent, or possibly leaves early. Which unfortunatly,has become thenorm in our workplace.


    Many peopleentering the workforce in this country today have no background in any form of work experience.This includes small household chores to after school work to summer jobs, etc. So when they finally go to work, their first job is when they're 21-22 yrs. old. They have no idea of all the mundane things that go into daily work. They've only been asked to focus on lofty situations in their education.So, therefore, when a supervisor asks them to do a task beneath what they believe to be their ability, they do it in a crummy way or don't do it at all.


    I'm only going to touch on this idea of "Affirmative Action" for now. What AA is, is the artificial insertion into this society (jobmarket) of a group, Black people(It started with Blacks) who unfortunatly aren't up to doing even this watered down version of work required of them in todays workplace.


    Of course, companies that leave this workplace are saving money by hiring people at lower wages overseas, but what goes unsaid is what I've written above, because these companies still want to sell their products on this market and it wouldn't be good business to say such things.


    I assure you that I take no pleasure in any way by saying such things.On the contrary, I'm extremely sad about this.



  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    6,384
    “No problem” would mean I can do it! Some may use it lightly
    other seriously but it is just an expression. By the way,
    every generation thinks the younger generations are lazy and the
    younger generations think the older ones know nothing. It is
    interesting to note that businesses found workers to do jobs that are
    considered to be beneath Americans today by the powers that be, until
    they found cheaper sources of labor. Of course, a lot of time
    labor that is cheaper is not as valuable because you get what you pay
    for.



    I doubt that the decline in the American workforce
    has come from White Americans but from programs such as “Affirmative
    Action” and businesses hiring cheap foreigners. In any race some
    people are going to be trouble but in many non-whites the problem is a
    great many are negatives to the business costing more than they
    produce. White workers have to make up the short fall. Of
    course, it has been suggested that Whites who work to hard in some
    companies are let go because they are showing up the minority hires.



    I would suggest that look at the time the decline
    began the 60’s and 70’s. What changes were going on at that time.
    You had hippies (later yuppies) who are now the ones shipping the
    factories overseas, but in addition you had the so-called “Civil Rights
    Movement.” I would suggest “Affirmative Action” and like programs
    (including immigration reform and lack of enforcement) is the key to
    the decline in the American workforce. When
    non-whites are given jobs they can’t perform, and are forced along side
    Whites the work environment becomes hostile to the White workers.





  4. #4


    Michael


    I agree with most of what you've got to say. We're we differ is our read on just what is going on with the work force.


    Your point is well taken about older peoplethroughout history saying that younger people aren't up to doing things right. The differencehere is that this generation isn't even doing anything at all (Of course, I recognize that there are excellent young people as well). However, the vast majority of this younger generationhasn't been trained to do work.My own experience with this was as a member of my aprenticeship committee in my local union. We didn't know what was happening. We didn't understand that young men couldn't do simple things that children of bygone days did without thought.We didn't understand the lack of strength in so many of the young men apprenticing.Many of these young men were also quite prone to injury, something we'd never run into before. Of course, the idea of injury in young men today has changed as well. There is no idea of just getting better and then going back to work anymore. The idea has changed to thatof suing and getting a lot of money, further pushing up insurance rates of our union contractors. Making the local less competitive against the nonunion contractor.We finally were forced to lower all physical fitness standardsso that we could keep a flow of men coming into the trade.


    "No problem" - I didn't makemyself clear. This phrase represents an attitude more than just a figure of speech.


    Minorities - That's what I said. They've been artificially inserted in the workforce and now they have to be kept there by atificial means, such as AA. If it wasn't for these means, they'd be out of the workforce (for the most part)in six months if companies were allowed to reenstate reasonable standards.


    I've gone on too long. Sorry about that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •